You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
MRV/Transparency helpdesk
ForumDiscussions
:
Is it still good to use Monte Carlo approach when we have only one emission factor value? (the activity data are varied). Or is it more applicable for analysis involving more than one value of both EF & AD?
Home
News
Library
Forum
Calendar
Sign in
Technical resources for implementing the measurement, reporting and verification arrangements under the Convention and the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement.
Quick Launch
Pictures
Libraries
Document Links1
Lists
ForumTopics
ExpertsSearchTest
Experts database
ForumDiscussions
News
webinar
Test
LibraryCategories
Discussions
Library
News
Library
All Site Content
Click here to search
people, events, meetings, documents...
Choose
SEARCH
Home
/
Forum
/
Is it still good to use Monte Carlo approach when we have only one emission factor value? (the activity data are varied). Or is it more applicable for analysis involving more than one value of both EF & AD?
Is it still good to use Monte Carlo approach when we have only one emission factor value? (the activity data are varied). Or is it more applicable for analysis involving more than one value of both EF & AD?
29.05.2018
By Serkant Samurkas
Comments
29.05.2018
by Serkant Samurkas
It is good to use Monte Carlo for both of these scenarios since the conditions for applying it are so flexible. The times when it is better to use Monte Carlo than propagation of error does not depend on the number of variables. Applying Monte Carlo will lead to more accurate results when the variables have high uncertainty, non-normal equations, data are correlated, models are complex, and uncertainty varies between inventory years.
(Anna McMurray, Winrock International)