You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
MRV/Transparency helpdesk
ForumDiscussions
:
- What are the main differences in terms of QA/QC with between the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines and the 2006 IPCC Guidelines?
Home
News
Library
Forum
Calendar
Sign in
Technical resources for implementing the measurement, reporting and verification arrangements under the Convention and the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement.
Quick Launch
Pictures
Libraries
Document Links1
Lists
ForumTopics
ExpertsSearchTest
Experts database
ForumDiscussions
News
webinar
Test
LibraryCategories
Discussions
Library
News
Library
All Site Content
Click here to search
people, events, meetings, documents...
Choose
SEARCH
Home
/
Forum
/
- What are the main differences in terms of QA/QC with between the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines and the 2006 IPCC Guidelines?
- What are the main differences in terms of QA/QC with between the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines and the 2006 IPCC Guidelines?
28.04.2020
By Tugba Icmeli
Comments
28.04.2020
by Tugba Icmeli
In the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines, there was no specific guidance on QA/QC. Instead, guidance for QA/QC is provided in the Good Practice Guidance (GPG) reports. The 2006 IPCC Guidelines contain guidance on QA/QC which are drawn from those contained in the GPG. Therefore, there is no substantive change. If an expert applied QA/QC guidance contained in the GPG reports, that expert will have no issue in switching over and using the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The modalities, procedures and guidelines for the enhanced transparency framework adopted in Katowice in December 2019 encourages developing countries to encouraged to elaborate an inventory QA/QC plan in accordance with the IPCC guidelines, and implement and provide information on general inventory QC procedures in accordance with their QA/QC plans. This is a new reporting provision compared to current UNFCCC guidelines for national communications and biennial update reports.