Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
MRV/Transparency helpdesk

:

ForumDiscussions : - What are the main differences in terms of QA/QC with between the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines and the 2006 IPCC Guidelines?

Technical resources for implementing the measurement, reporting and verification arrangements under the Convention and the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement.
- What are the main differences in terms of QA/QC with between the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines and the 2006 IPCC Guidelines?
28.04.2020 By Tugba Icmeli
Comments
28.04.2020by Tugba Icmeli
In the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines, there was no specific guidance on QA/QC. Instead, guidance for QA/QC is provided in the Good Practice Guidance (GPG) reports. The 2006 IPCC Guidelines contain guidance on QA/QC which are drawn from those contained in the GPG.  Therefore, there is no substantive change.  If an expert applied QA/QC guidance contained in the GPG reports, that expert will have no issue in switching over and using the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The modalities, procedures and guidelines for the enhanced transparency framework adopted in Katowice in December 2019 encourages developing countries to encouraged to elaborate an inventory QA/QC plan in accordance with the IPCC guidelines, and implement and provide information on general inventory QC procedures in accordance with their QA/QC plans. This is a new reporting provision compared to current UNFCCC guidelines for national communications and biennial update reports.