You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
To navigate through the Ribbon, use standard browser navigation keys. To skip between groups, use Ctrl+LEFT or Ctrl+RIGHT. To jump to the first Ribbon tab use Ctrl+[. To jump to the last selected command use Ctrl+]. To activate a command, use Enter.
Site Actions
This page location is:
CGE - eNetwork
ForumComments
(no title)
Browse
Tab 1 of 2.
View
Tab 2 of 2.
Sign In
Edit
Item
Version History
Manage Permissions
Delete Item
Manage
MRV/Transparency helpdesk
ForumComments
:
(no title)
Home
News
Library
Experts database
Forum
Calendar
Sign in
Technical resources for implementing the measurement, reporting and verification arrangements under the Convention and the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement.
Quick Launch
Libraries
Lists
ForumTopics
ForumDiscussions
News
webinar
ExpertsSearchTest
Experts database
Pages
Currently selected
All Site Content
Click here to search
people, events, meetings, documents...
Choose
All
SEARCH
Title
Comment
It is good to use Monte Carlo for both of these scenarios since the conditions for applying it are so flexible. The times when it is better to use Monte Carlo than propagation of error does not depend on the number of variables. Applying Monte Carlo will lead to more accurate results when the variables have high uncertainty, non-normal equations, data are correlated, models are complex, and uncertainty varies between inventory years.
(Anna McMurray, Winrock International)
Discussion
Is it still good to use Monte Carlo approach when we have only one emission factor value? (the activity data are varied). Or is it more applicable for analysis involving more than one value of both EF & AD?
Attachments
Created at 29/05/2018 16:19 by Novita Syaputri
Last modified at 29/05/2018 16:19 by Novita Syaputri