- A Source of Support
A.1 | Support title | |
A.2 | Support description |
GEF unites 183 countries in partnership with international institutions, civil society organizations (CSOs), and the private sector to address global environmental issues while supporting national sustainable development initiatives. Today the GEF is the largest public funder of projects to improve the global environment. An independently operating financial organization, the GEF provides grants for projects related to biodiversity, climate change, international waters, land degradation, the ozone layer, and persistent organic pollutants. The GEF projects in climate change help developing countries and economies in transition to contribute to the overall objective of the UNFCCC "to achieve [...] stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner" (from the text of the UNFCCC, Art.2). The GEF supports projects in: ■Climate Change Mitigation: Reducing or avoiding greenhouse gas emissions in the areas of renewable energy; energy efficiency; sustainable transport; and management of land use, land-use change ,and forestry (LULUCF) ■Climate Change Adaptation: Aiming at developing countries to become climate-resilient by promoting both immediate and longer-term adaptation measures in development policies, plans, programs, projects, and actions. For more information on funding modalities for countries (http://www.thegef.org/gef/country_eligibility) to access GEF Trust Fund for NAMA related activities under Climate Change portfolio please visit: http://www.thegef.org/gef/who_can_apply
|
A.3 | Parties | |
A.4 | Government entity providing the resources | |
|
A.4.1 | Contact Person 1 | |
A.4.2 | Address | |
A.4.3 | Phone | |
A.4.4 | Email | |
A.4.5 | Contact Person 2 | |
A.4.6 | Address | |
A.4.7 | Phone | |
A.4.8 | Email | |
A.4.9 | Contact Person 3 | |
A.4.10 | Address | |
A.4.11 | Phone | |
A.4.12 | Email | |
- B Organization channelling the resources
- C Currency
C.1 | Used Currency |
|
Conversion to USD: 1 |
|
- D Support available
D.1 | Support available for |
|
D.1.1 | Regional scope | |
D.1.2 | Comments (provide further details on regional scope) |
The GEF Agencies are responsible for creating project proposals and for managing GEF projects. The GEF Agencies play a key role in managing GEF projects on the ground; more specifically, GEF Agencies assist eligible governments and NGOs in the development, implementation, and management of GEF projects. Through them, the GEF project portfolio has quickly grown and diversified serving the developing world, Eastern Europe, and the Russian Federation. Moreover, GEF teamwork by these partners reinforces their individual efforts to mainstream or incorporate global environment concerns into all of their policies, programs and projects. GEF Agencies are requested to focus their involvement in GEF project activities within their respective comparative advantages. In specific cases of integrated projects that include components where the expertise and experience of a GEF agency is lacking or weak, the agency is invited to partner with another agency and to establish clear complementary roles so that all aspects of the project can be well managed (GEF Instrument, Paragraph 28). The list below describes 10 GEF agencies that currently operating and their comparative advantage specifically related to adaptation to climate change: •Asian Development Bank (ADB)'s comparative advantage for the GEF includes investment projects at the country and multi-country level in Asia as well as the ability to incorporate capacity building and technical assistance into its projects. The ADB has strong experience in the fields of energy efficiency, renewable energy, adaptation to climate change and natural resources management including water and sustainable land management. •African Development Bank (AFDB)'s comparative advantage for the GEF lies in its capacity as a regional development bank. The AFDB is, however, in the initial stages of tackling global environmental issues. Its environmental policy has only recently been approved and is in the process of being integrated into operations. The AFDB will focus on establishing a track record for environmental projects related to the GEF focal areas of Climate Change (adaptation, renewable energy and energy efficiency), Land Degradation (deforestation, desertification) and International Waters (water management and fisheries). •European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)'s comparative advantage for the GEF lies in its experience and track record in market creation and transformation; and ensuring sustainability through private sector (including small and medium-sized enterprises) and municipal environmental infrastructure projects at the country and regional level in the countries of eastern and central Europe and central Asia, particularly in the fields of energy efficiency, mainstreaming of biodiversity and water management. •Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)'s comparative advantage for the GEF is its technical capacity and experience in fisheries, forestry, agriculture, and natural resources management. The FAO has strong experience in sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity, bioenergy, biosafety, sustainable development in production landscapes, and integrated pest and pesticides management. •Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)'s comparative advantage for the GEF includes investment projects at the country and regional level in Latin America and the Caribbean. IDB finances operations related to the following GEF focal areas: Biodiversity (protected areas, marine resources, forestry biotechnology), Climate Change (including biofuels), International Waters (watershed management), Land Degradation (erosion control), and POPs (pest management). •International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)’s comparative advantage for the GEF lies in its work related to land degradation, rural sustainable development, integrated land management, and its role in the implementation of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification. IFAD has been working intensively in marginal lands, degraded ecosystems and in post-conflict situations. •United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)’s comparative advantage for the GEF lies in its global network of country offices, its experience in integrated policy development, human resources development, institutional strengthening, and non-governmental and community participation. UNDP assists countries in promoting, designing and implementing activities consistent with both the GEF mandate and national sustainable development plans. UNDP also has extensive inter-country programming experience. •United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)’s comparative advantage for the GEF is related to its being the only United Nations organization with a mandate derived from the General Assembly to coordinate the work of the United Nations in the area of environment for which the core business is the field of environment. UNEP’s comparative strength is in providing the GEF with a range of relevant experiences, proof of concept, testing of ideas, and the best available science and knowledge upon which it can base its investments. It also serves as the Secretariat to three of the MEAs, for which GEF is the/a financial mechanism. UNEP’s comparative advantage also includes its ability to serve as a broker in multi-stakeholder consultations. •United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)’s comparative advantage for the GEF is that it can involve the industrial sector in GEF projects in the following areas: industrial energy efficiency, renewable energy services, water management, chemicals management (including POP and ODS), and biotechnology. UNIDO also has extensive knowledge of small and medium enterprises (SME’s) in developing and transition economy countries. • The World Bank’s comparative advantage for the GEF is as a leading international financial institution at the global scale in a number of sectors, similar to the comparative advantage of the regional development banks. The World Bank has strong experience in investment lending focusing on institution building, infrastructure development and policy reform across all the focal areas of the GEF.
|
D.1.3 | Target country (in any) | |
D.2.1 | Amount of Financial support | |
D.2.2 | Maximum amount of Financial support per NAMA | |
D.2.3 | Type of required Financial support | |
D.2.4 | Comments on Financial support |
The GEF continues to support for the preparation and/or implementation of nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs) through its regular financing of climate change mitigation projects endorsed by the developing country parties. Countries can access resources through their Systerm for a Transparent Allocation of Resources (STAR) allocations under GEF-5 (2010–2014) replenishment period for NAMAs support. For more information on STAR: http://www.thegef.org/gef/node/152 These country profiles provide information about individual country information under the following headings: - GEF Constituencies - GEF Council and Alternate Members - GEF Operational and Political Focal Points - GEF Accredited NGOS - STAR GEF-5 (2010-2014) Resource Allocations and Utilizations - RAF GEF-4 Allocations and Utilization - Approved Projects and Projects Under Preparation To view information for the above mentioned topics, select a country from the drop-down list following this link: http://www.thegef.org/gef/country_profile
|
D.3.1 | Amount of Technological support | |
D.3.2 | Maximum amount of Technological support per NAMA | |
D.3.3 | Type of Technology | |
D.3.4 | Comments on Technological support |
The GEF has been supporting countries in development and preparation of NAMAs in priority sectors. The GEF through its regular financing has been supporting a wide range of project concepts on NAMAs. Elements financed include national or regional policy development, related institutional strengthening, strategy formulation, appropriate investments, and capacity building. The GEF supported NAMAs are expected to contribute towards achieving economy-wide emission goals through preparation of policy and regulatory frameworks, sectoral approaches, market transformation and by strengthening institutional capacity. For more information on approved NAMA (as of June 2013)Projects and Funding details: Azerbaijan: http://www.thegef.org/gef/project_detail?projID=5291 Kazakhstan: http://www.thegef.org/gef/project_detail?projID=5059 Peru: http://www.thegef.org/gef/project_detail?projID=4884 Tunisia: http://www.thegef.org/gef/project_detail?projID=5340
|
D.4.1 | Amount of Capacity Building support | |
D.4.2 | Maximum amount of Capacity Building support per NAMA | |
D.4.3 | Type of Capacity Building support | |
D.4.4 | Comments on Capacity Building support |
The GEF is also supporting countries in design and development of appropriate and robust monitoring tools that complies with the MRV needs for supported NAMAs through coordinated financing for enabling activities such as national communications and biennial update reports that track the progress on national commitments and mitigation actions, emissions and emission reductions.
|
- E Types of action that may be supported
E.1 | Sector | |
E.2 | Type of action | |
- F Process for the provision of support
- G Attachments
- H Information on support provided
H.1 | Outside the Registry | |
H.2 | within the Registry |
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions for low-carbon end-use sectors in Azerbaijan | Financial | 100,000 | | 6/4/2014 |
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions for Low-carbon Urban Development in Kazakhstan | Financial | 5,930,000 | | 10/20/2014 |
Development of a feed-in tariff NAMA for renewable energy | Financial | 3,500,000 | | 7/13/2015 |
NAMA Support for the Tunisian Solar Plan | Financial | 3,600,000 | The GEF provided a financial support to the National Implementing Entity, ANME, to design and partially implement this NAMA. The design phase was concluded in 2014 and the GEF project is now implementing a set of activities that address some, but not all, of the NAMA elements. Additional donors/financiers are welcomed/requested to address these gaps in full NAMA implementation. | 8/31/2015 |
Appropriate Mitigation Actions in Energy Generation and End Use Sectors in Sri Lanka | Financial | 1,790,411 | Support Received under GEF Cycle 5 | 8/14/2017 |
|
|
|