Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
  
  
  
NWPInformationType
  
  
NWPRelevantStakeholders
NWPEffortsToAddressSOE
NWPFocusonNElossesFlag
Good practices and lessons learned
NWPMandatesandFrameworks
NWPTypeOfOrganization
  
NWPModalityApproachandMechanism
NWPOutcome
NWPPartner
Scope of work
  
NWPGeographicRegion
  
NWPGeographicScope
  
NWPOutputs
Country
Target group
  
  
  
NWPReferences
Adaptation element
  
Adaptation sector/theme
  
NWPUpdate
  
  
NWPSlowOnsetEvents
  
  
Description
  
Content Type
  
  
  
  
  
NWPWeblink
NWPRelevantWeblinks
  
2951606/12/2025 10:30Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2680NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2951506/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3175NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2951406/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3174NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2951306/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3173NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2951206/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3172NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2951106/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3171NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2951006/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3170NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950906/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3149NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950806/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3148NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950706/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3147NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950606/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3146NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950506/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3145NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950406/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
3144NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
whatsapp** +♻️✅|+| )))+966505183480(( |▐♻️★Abortion Pills Sale in Muscat _ Oman
  
2950306/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
Abortion pills in Jeddah (+966505183480) buy cytotec
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2685NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2950206/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2660NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2950106/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
About Abortion Pills in Jeddah+966572737505
About Abortion Pills in Jeddah+966572737505
Africa, AsiaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Financial supportAgriculture
crmmocservices
About Abortion Pills in Jeddah+966572737505
2659NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2950006/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2658NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949906/12/2025 10:00Tool
Civil society
Creatoronx
AsiaLocal, National, Subregional
Pakistan
Communities, Practitioners, Private sector06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Vulnerability assessmentBiodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Services, Tourism, Urban resilience
crmmocservices
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
2651NWPSearchableItem053186hm@gmail.comTechnical document/reportPakistan
https://x.com/HM2DC3186FIVE?t=4g7LmKJ2yStYuIfrhOiDPA&s=09
  
2949806/12/2025 10:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists06/12/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2650NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949317/09/2025 09:30Case study
Civil society
Missing Information
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
AfricaNational
Egypt
Policy makers, Practitioners28/10/2025 11:29No presence informationElla Stewart
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture
crmmocservices
This case study showcases Egypt’s development of a national Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) framework to track climate adaptation progress in agrifood systems. Led by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) through the Scaling up Climate Ambition on Land Use and Agriculture through Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans (SCALA) programme, this framework supports Egypt in systemically assessing the effectiveness of its adaptation actions, informing learning, and fulfilling national and international reporting commitments. Aligned with Egypt’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), the MEL framework ensures policy coherence and contributes to global frameworks such as the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), and the UAE-Belém Work Programme. 

Purpose and objectives of the MEL framework 
The framework aims to: 
  • Monitor the effectiveness of adaptation interventions in agrifood systems. 
  • Evaluate progress in reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing resilience, inform policy and investment through data-driven insights, support the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process, align with UNFCCC, SDGs, SFDRR, and the GGA, and enable learning and continuous improvement in adaptation planning and implementation.
Climate risk drivers in agrifood systems and adaptation priorties: Egypt’s agrifood systems are affected by water scarcity, extreme weather events, land degradation, rising temperatures, and biodiversity loss. These drivers guided the formulation of adaptation priorities and the MEL framework’s indicator selection. The MEL framework reflects key adaptation priorities derived from national policy and strategy documents, including the National Climate Change Strategy, Egypt Vision 2030, and sectoral strategies. Priorities include: 
  1. water management and resource protection 
  2. crops, livestock, and fisheries resilience 
  3. soil and land management
  4. disaster risk preparedness 
  5. biodiversity and ecosystem protection
  6. institutional and community capacity strengthening. 
Approach for developing the framework: Theory of change and adaptation results pathways 
A Theory of Change underpins the MEL system, linking climate risks to adaptation actions and expected outputs, outcomes, and impacts. It identifies intermediate results such as: Farmer training and awareness, adoption of resilient practices, improved water use, policy implementation capacity. These results contribute to long-term adaptation outcomes aligned with the GGA: reduced vulnerability, improved adaptive capacity, and enhanced resilience. The indicator framework covers: 
  1. ​Adaptation actions and sectoral priorities 
  2. Dimensions of the Global Goal on Adaptation. Adaptive capacity, vulnerability reduction and resilience building 
  3. Target 9b of UAE-Belém framework for climate resilience which focuses on food and agriculture. 
Indicators span process, output, outcome, and impact levels. The summary of indicators include:
  1. Water use efficiency and resource protection, Agriculture water stress, Volume of water used per unit of agriculture output, Water use efficiency trends in agriculture, SDG 6.4.2: Level of water stress (freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources)
  2.  Water quality, SDG 6.4.1: Change in water-use efficiency over time, Water measurements for agricultural crops (3 units)/crop shape. 2. Crop management and protection. Change in yield stability under extreme weather conditions, Crop variety improvement for climate resilience & productivity, Changes in crop losses due to climate related stressors, Area, yield, and production of various crops, Breed improvement to increase productivity, Reduction in crop loss during climate risk periods (e.g., droughts), Hectares cultivated with drought- or salinity-tolerant crops, Percentage of farmers using improved crop varieties, No of farmers adopting improved practices. 
  3. Livestock and fisheries management. Reduction in livestock mortality due to heat stress, % increase in productivity (e.g., milk yield, fish harvest) from climate-adapted practices, Improved feeding practices, Percentage increase in livestock survival rates during heatwaves, Average livestock productivity (milk, meat, or egg yield) under stress, Feeding methods followed according to breeding methods, Fodder production size, Productivity Map, SDG 14.b.1: Degree of application of legal/regulatory frameworks protecting small-scale fisheries, SDG 2.5.2 - Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction, Improved policy frameworks for livestock and fisheries, Availability of fodder. 
  4. Soil and land management. Reduced need for fertilizers in specific crops, % reduction in soil erosion and soil infertility in climate-vulnerable areas, change in soil organic matter content in targeted agricultural zones, Fertilizer requirements for crops, Soil fertility, Soil health data and organic matter, SDG 15.1.1: Forest area as a proportion of total land area, Area of land using tree agroforestry or vegetative cover to prevent degradation.
  5. Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. % change in the population of key indicator species in protected ecosystems, % of livestock, poultry, or fisheries covered by genetic diversity conservation programs, Number of biodiversity-related policies or action plans implemented with climate adaptation components, SDG 2.5.1: Number of plant and animal genetic resources for food and agriculture secured in conservation facilities. 
  6. Climate and disaster risk management and early warning systems. % of loss and damage (crops, livestock, assets) averted due to early warning actions, % of national or local disaster response plans that integrate agriculture-specific climate risks, Number of coordination mechanisms established for climate and disaster risk management, % of agricultural regions covered by operational early warning systems (EWS) for climate-related hazards, Number of weather/climate forecasts or alerts disseminated to farming communities per season, Number of farmers receiving and acting on early warning or advisory services, Sendai RR C-2 - Direct agricultural loss attributed to disasters.
  7. Built adaptive capacities of institutions, communities, and farmers in CSA. Number of farmers trained in CSA practices (e.g., conservation agriculture, agroforestry, integrated soil-water management), % of agricultural extension officers trained in climate adaptation and CSA, Farmers participating in social protection programmes and insurance schemes, Number of farmers benefiting from extension services, Number of farmers participating in insurance programs, Number of institutions with dedicated climate adaptation units or functions in agriculture. 
  8. Poverty reduction, food security and nutrition. % change in household income among climate-vulnerable farming populations, % reduction in the prevalence of undernourishment or food insecurity, % of children under 5 with improved nutritional status (e.g., reduction in stunting or wasting) in areas implementing adaptation measures, % of adaptation programs that include food and nutrition as explicit objectives. SDG 2.3.2 - Average income of small-scale food producers, by sex, SDG 2.1.2 - Using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), SDG 2.1.1 - Prevalence of Undernourishment, % of agricultural production dedicated to nutrient-rich crops promoted under climate-resilient systems. 
3360NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949417/09/2025 09:30Case study
Viet Nam’s phased approach to implementing the MEL system allowed for gradual scaling and flexibility, ensuring that the system was not overwhelming at the start. The online reporting system facilitated effective data sharing and regional coordination, making it easier to track progress across different governance levels. The inclusion of regional considerations from the outset ensured that adaptation actions were relevant and targeted, reflecting the country’s diverse climate impacts. Key lessons learned from Viet Nam’s experience include the importance of starting small and building capacity incrementally, the need for a clear governance framework to allocate roles and responsibilities, and the value of regional coordination to ensure that adaptation plans align with local needs. The learning period of the MEL system is very important, as it should be modified to fit with changing circumstances, adaptation priorities and level of climate change intergation into social economic goal. The MEL should not be burden for national and subnational governance, moreover the system should support the implementation of climate change adaptation goals.
Civil society
Viet Nam’s MEL system has significantly advanced the country’s capacity to track and assess climate adaptation actions. By engaging both national and provincial levels, the system has enhanced regional coordination and ensured that data flows smoothly between levels of government. This enables timely reporting on the progress of national and regional adaptation plans. The online reporting system has also streamlined the collection and sharing of information, facilitating coordination among stakeholders and improving decision-making. The database created by the online reporting system becomes part of climate change database and support the government for their management. The result of the MEL system was supportive for the updating NAP and NDC. Viet Nam has updated the NAP in 2025 based and on the process of developing the NDC 3.0 based on the MEL’ result. The phased approach has allowed Vietnam to adjust its monitoring strategies progressively, minimizing the complexity of the system at the outset while still ensuring effective tracking of adaptation activities. The capacity-building efforts have enhanced the skills of relevant stakeholders, including local authorities, ensuring that the MEL system can be sustained over time.
International Institute for Sustainable Development
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, South AmericaLocal, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Vietnam
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners10/10/2025 14:21No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Health, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Urban resilience, Tourism, Services, Heavy industry
crmmocservices
In Viet Nam, a comprehensive Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system was developed in 2022 to assess the progress of climate adaptation activities. The system was designed to ensure effective coordination at both regional and national levels, with a specific focus on regional coordination. The system was ratified by the Prime minister, which strategically allocates responsibilities across different levels of governance, fostering collaboration between regional and national entities. At the national level, the Ministry of Agriculture and Enivirontment (MAE) (former the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment- MONRE) leads the assessment of implementation progress on national adaptation efforts. The system places significant emphasis on integrating regional considerations to ensure that adaptation policies are relevant and effective at various governance levels, from provinces to ministries. Viet Nam’s MEL system employed a phased approach, beginning with a limited set of monitoring indicators to pilot the system. This strategy allowed the system to avoid early complexity and provided flexibility to adjust indicators based on lessons learned. The first phase focused on capacity building, establishing an online reporting system, and piloting M&E indicators. As the system evolved, the indicators were refined to ensure better data collection and reporting. The MEL system consist of 72 indicators, which allows to monitor and evaluate the adaptation activities through 6 evaluation contents: (i) state management of climate change; (ii) strengthening resilience and capacity to adapt to climate change in the following areas; (iii) reducing natural disaster risks and minimizing damage caused by climate change; (iv) resources for climate change adaptation; (v) science, technology and international cooperation; (vi) training, propaganda, raising awareness. These indicators include the gender and social inclusion’ indicators. This is the government’s efforts to integrate gender and social inclusion into climate change adaptation activities. Viet Nam also develop the Manual for the MEL, which is very supportive during the trainings and capacity building. The MEL system help to acess the process of implementation of the NAP, NDC and provide the imput to GST, other climate change reports, such as adapation communication, BUR and BTR.
3361NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://www.iisd.org;#International Institute for Sustainable Development
  
2949727/09/2025 21:30Case study
Good practices: • Participatory indicator identification: The MFIF is being designed with active participation from all eight-member Model Forests in Asia. This long and careful process ensures that the indicators reflect what the Model Forests themselves find relevant, rather than being solely dictated by the secretariat. This approach fostered ownership and relevance of the framework. • Integration into governance: Wherever possible, the framework is linked to local governance structures. In Carood Watershed Model Forest, there is strong buy-in from government agencies, which has enhanced legitimacy and support. In Ngao Model Forest, although the MFIF is a novel approach, it has brought together multiple stakeholders and members of the association, creating a platform for collaboration and shared understanding. • Youth engagement: The piloting process provides opportunities to connect with youth, helping them understand the framework and prepare for long-term involvement in MFIF implementation. • Ownership-based planning: The lengthy and iterative design process allowed Member Forests to contribute meaningfully, reinforcing the sense of ownership and commitment to the framework. Lessons learned: • Sustained financing is essential: Co-financing or other funding mechanisms help maintain momentum, motivation, and engagement within the Model Forests. • Time builds trust: Lengthy, participatory processes are necessary for stakeholders to genuinely own the framework. Ownership cannot be rushed—it develops over time through involvement and dialogue. • Context and capacity matter: Implementation of the monitoring framework is not always straightforward. Geography, local conditions, and varying capacities can affect how the indicators are applied. Different levels of capacity may require tailored approaches; with extra effort and support, even those with limited capacity can be meaningfully engaged. Adaptive and flexible strategies are crucial for inclusive participation.
Civil society
The MEL system will create a pathway for continuous learning and collaboration among eight Model Forests across Asia. It will improve the capacity of the Model Forests to reflect on their own ecosystems and design a monitoring framework based on their needs.
RECOFTC - The Center for People and Forests
AsiaLocal, Regional
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector27/09/2025 21:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and informationAgriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Tourism, Water resources
crmmocservices
RECOFTC serves as the secretariat of the Regional Model Forest Network – Asia (RMFN–Asia) and is leading the development of the Model Forest Indicator Framework (MFIF). This framework is designed to strengthen the performance and resilience of Model Forests across the Asia-Pacific region, including the Philippines, Japan, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and China. The MFIF is an initiative for a Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system that focuses on four key pillars: ecosystems, production, governance and human well-being. Its main objectives are to: • Promote regular knowledge exchange and learning among Model Forests • Enhance data-driven decision-making, and adaptive management • Provide a standardized approach to monitoring, evaluation, and learning while allowing flexibility for specific Model Forests The draft indicator framework includes: • Core indicators: essential metrics applicable across all Model Forests • Optional indicators: metrics that can be adapted to the specific context or priorities of individual model forests Currently, the MFIF is being piloted in two Model Forests: Carood Watershed Model Forest in the Philippines and Ngao Model Forest in Thailand. In addition, a guideline is being developed to help any future Model Forest or landscape adopt the same indicator framework for their monitoring and decision-making processes. Key features of the MFIF include: • Comprehensive framework: enables Model Forests to synchronize activities using standardized indicators, ensuring consistent monitoring and evaluation across sites • Data collection plan: identifies data sources, methods, and tools to gather information effectively • Data sharing plan: outlines formats and platforms for sharing data to ensure compatibility, accessibility, and collaboration among stakeholders • Comparative analysis: all indicators are compared against national or regional averages to provide context and enhance the usefulness of collected data • Boundary identification: clearly delineates the extent of Model Forests and their administrative jurisdictions to ensure clarity and regulatory compliance
3366NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949627/09/2025 21:30Case study
Good practices: • Participatory design and prioritization: Involving CFUGs, women, youth and marginalized groups ensured adaptation actions reflected local priorities, enhancing legitimacy and uptake. • Evidence-based decision-making: Combining community knowledge with long-term climate data and GIS mapping provided robust baselines for planning and monitoring. • Integration into local governance: Endorsement at ward and municipal levels secured funding and political buy-in, critical for scaling. • Joint monitoring: Multi-stakeholder monitoring enhanced accountability, ensured technical quality, and provided iterative feedback for improvements. • NbS co-benefits: Nature-based solutions addressed climate risks while generating tangible social and economic co-benefits (water, income, reduced hazards). Lessons: • Sustainability requires institutionalization: Embedding NbS into municipal plans and budgets is essential for long-term continuity. • Scaling depends on co-financing: Leveraging local resources reduced dependency on external funding and demonstrated replicability. • Adaptive capacity is uneven: Women, Dalit and low-income groups benefited most when explicitly targeted; equity considerations must remain central. • Early wins build momentum: Visible benefits (e.g., increased pond water, no fires) motivated communities and local authorities to invest further. • Monitoring as a learning tool: Regular joint monitoring not only tracked progress but also built local technical capacity and trust in the process.
Civil society
Monitoring and follow-up assessments documented the following results: • Water security: Three recharge ponds benefited ~400 households, increasing water volume and soil moisture, with expansion to five more ponds through local co-investment. • Land stabilization: Landslide and gully treatment with bamboo and native vegetation conserved 0.6 hectares of degraded land. Survived extreme rainfall and prevented landslides, unlike untreated areas. • Forest restoration and income potential: One hectare of degraded forest restored with 800 Moso bamboo seedlings, creating future income opportunities, particularly for women and poorer households. • Disaster risk reduction: Community-based fire management (mapping, firebreaks, coordination) resulted in no forest fire incidents recorded in 2025. • Livelihood diversification: Goat-rearing support to 57 marginalized households (with insurance and veterinary services) generated sustainable income streams, positioning Ward No. 13 as a potential goat-farming hub. • Institutional commitment: Local leadership endorsed FLVAA outcomes, with local government confirming readiness to expand and replicate NbS interventions to other wards. • Co-financing leveraged: 54% of resources for prioritized NbS mobilized from municipal and local sources, strengthening ownership.
RECOFTC - The Center for People and Forests
AsiaLocal
Nepal
Communities, Policy makers27/09/2025 21:30crmmocservices
Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentCommunity-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Water resources
crmmocservices
RECOFTC implemented the Forest Landscape Vulnerability Assessment to Action (FLVAA) approach in Ward No. 13 of Chautara Sangachokgadhi Municipality, Sindhupalchok District, Nepal. The ward covers 11.17 km², with over 60 percent forest cover, and is home to 1,258 households across diverse ethnic groups including Brahmin, Chhetri, Dalit and Janajati communities. Ten community forest user groups (CFUGs) play a central role in natural resource governance. The FLVAA focused on five communities (Bhedigoth, Bimreni, Rolpakha, Shreechhap and Tamakhani) identified for their climate exposure and social vulnerability. The process followed seven participatory steps: 1. Initial ward-level discussions to identify climate risks and priorities. 2. Community-level consultations and participatory data collection (risk mapping, hazard ranking, seasonal calendars, vulnerability matrices). 3. Preparation of a comprehensive assessment report integrating community knowledge, 30-year climate data and GIS-based land-use mapping. 4. Participatory prioritization of adaptation actions, with emphasis on nature-based solutions (NbS). 5. Endorsement of the report at ward and municipal levels, enabling co-financing (54% of total resources). 6. Implementation of five NbS interventions (recharge ponds, gully treatment, bamboo plantation, fire management, goat-based livelihood support). 7. Joint monitoring with local government, CFUGs and stakeholders to track implementation quality, benefits and technical performance. The initiative aligned with RECOFTC’s Sacred Himalayan Landscape program and placed special emphasis on women, marginalized groups, and low-income households.
3365NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949527/09/2025 21:30Case study
One of the main challenges in implementing Panama's Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system is its limited alignment with the National Adaptation Plan (NAP), as the NAPs are still under development. However, this also presents an opportunity to consider and integrate the M&E system from the early stages of the NAP design process. Ensuring the proper integration of M&E frameworks into national policies is crucial for their effectiveness and long-term sustainability. The ongoing review and update process presents an opportunity to strengthen this alignment, ensuring that the M&E system supports national adaptation priorities while remaining flexible enough to address specific sectoral needs. Panama's experience underscores the importance of continuous evaluation and refinement of M&E frameworks to enhance their functionality and policy relevance.
Civil society
Since its launch in 2021, the M&E system has provided a structured approach to monitoring climate-related initiatives, helping stakeholders assess progress in various sectors. Currently, the system tracks progress through twenty-one (21) indicators, monitoring sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity to climate change at the national level. In response to the evolving needs of national adaptation efforts, a second phase of the system is underway, focused on developing loss and damage indicators. These new indicators aim to assess and assign economic value to elements at risk from extreme hydrometeorological and slow-onset climate events, strengthening national climate risk management. Continuous updates and the integration of new data into the M&E System module ensure that the system remains dynamic, relevant, and effective. This approach enables Panama to consistently monitor and evaluate its adaptation efforts, providing critical information to guide national adaptation planning, policy formulation, and decision-making processes. The primary outcome of this initiative is the establishment of Panama’s MEL system, which is now operational and undergoing updates to improve its alignment with national policies and adaptation strategies. The ongoing review aims to refine its methodologies and ensure that the MEL system remains relevant and effective in guiding national adaptation planning and decision-making.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaRegional
Panama
Communities27/09/2025 21:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
Panama’s Monitoring and Evaluation, (M&E) system was officially launched in 2021 after several months of development. It was established as a strategic tool to support the implementation of adaptation actions, reduce vulnerability, enhance adaptive capacity, and promote the overall well-being of populations affected by climate change impacts. Since its launch in 2021, the system has provided a structured framework for monitoring climate-related initiatives across various sectors, fully aligned with Panama’s first Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC1) submitted in December 2020.The system focuses on tracking progress in key sectors such as agriculture and food security, health and wellbeing, water resources, infrastructure, ecosystems and services, energy systems, and coastal and low-lying zones. It operates at a regional level in Latin America and the Caribbean, specifically in Panama. Currently, the system is in the establishing phase, undergoing review and updates to enhance its effectiveness. The goal is to ensure that M&E supports evidence-based decision-making and improves the country's ability to monitor adaptation efforts across different sectors.
3364NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://www.gfdrr.org/en/publication/gfdrr-monitoring-evaluation-and-learning-mel-framework;#For further details, the GFDRR Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Framework can be accessed here.
  
2949217/09/2025 09:30Case study
The agricultural sector has been a key driver in advancing Colombia’s national adaptation M&E system. This work has not only strengthened institutional reporting processes within the sector but has also fostered greater collaboration between the agricultural and environmental sectors, laying a strong foundation for a more integrated, coordinated, and effective national response to climate change. Colombia’s approach offers key lessons: leveraging existing governance structures strengthens adaptation reporting, while integrating SIIVRA into SNICC promotes policy alignment and coherence through an integrated approach to climate change. A strong theoretical foundation, drawing on the TNC results and aligned with the IPCC’s risk framework, enhances the credibility of these efforts. The development of adaptation indicators specific to the agriculture sector and the focus on data readiness and availability at municipal level are critical for capturing locally relevant information that supports informed decision-making and evaluation of the impact of ongoing adaptation measures within priority value chains. Stakeholder engagement was critical, involving government agencies, research institutions, and producer associations. Their participation supported local adaptation planning and encouraged private-sector investment. Notably, the development of a certification scheme for climate-adapted agriculture provides a participatory incentive-based mechanism and MEL tool for mainstreaming adaptation practices, planning and investments at local level. However, challenges persist in integrating diverse data sources across governance levels. Fully incorporating agricultural adaptation indicators into MADR’s reporting requires improved data management and capacity-building. Clearer institutional roles for data collection, storage, and analysis, particularly between MADR and external partners are also needed.
Civil society
Colombia has made significant progress in the development of a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system for the agricultural sector. With the support provided through the NAP-Ag programme, a comprehensive set of 66 indicators has been identified to inform adaptation planning and decision-making across the sector, including 28 indicators for hazards, 23 for sensitivity, and 15 for adaptive capacity. These indicators were selected to capture the multifaceted nature of climate risks and vulnerabilities across 18 priority agricultural subsectors. They provide a foundation for integrating sector-specific data into Colombia’s national adaptation M&E system (SIIVRA), enabling the tracking of progress, the evaluation of outcomes, and the identification of strategic investments for a climate-resilient agriculture. These indicators include measures of changes in optimal agro-climatic conditions for each value chain; the contraction or expansion of areas suitable for key crops; the share of agriculture in regional GDP; poverty and aridity levels; the proportion of insured agricultural land; and the number of people or areas affected by floods and other extreme events. Adaptive capacity indicators cover factors such as the adoption of good agricultural practices, the availability of agricultural extension services and technical assistance, public investment in food security, water use efficiency, and the coverage of protected areas, among others. The selection process built on existing work, with 45 of the 66 indicators drawn directly from the 113 indicators used in Colombia’s Third National Communication (TNC) and 21 new indicators added to comprehensively cover the agricultural sectors. Indicators were selected based on criteria established in the TNC, including data availability for relevant time periods, the ability to disaggregate data to the departmental and municipal levels, engagement of local stakeholders in data collection, and reliance on official and regularly measured data sources (IDEAM et al., 2017). For each indicator, the data source, method of calculation, frequency of measurement, and intended use were clearly defined guiding locally relevant information. The results of the vulnerability and risk analysis have already been used to inform the selection of priority adaptation measures in the PIGCCS-Agricultura (MADR, 2021). This work has also laid the groundwork for Colombia’s first pilot certification in climate-adapted agriculture under the SCALA programme. This innovative certification is structured around four key components—soil, water, agroecosystems, and biodiversity and ecosystem services—and is informed by the results of the risk and vulnerability analysis, which were translated into 32 detailed assessments at the departmental level. The certification aims to recognize and support the adaptation efforts of small and medium-scale farmers through a participatory, locally tailored monitoring, evaluation, and learning tool. This tool guides evidence-based decision-making and fosters investments that promote adaptive pathways at the farm cluster level, in line with national priorities. These results will feed directly into the MEL platform currently being developed within FAO’s Colombia Climate Change Platform.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
South AmericaLocal, National
Colombia
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners17/09/2025 09:30crmmocservices
FAO. 2020. Resultados preliminares del análisis de capacidades de adaptación en subsectores de agropecuarios. Unpublished. Government of Colombia. 2020. Actualización de la Contribución Determinada a Nivel Nacional de Colombia (NDC). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/NDC%20actualizada%20de%20Colombia.pdf IDEAM, PNUD, MADS, DNP, CANCILLERÍA. 2017. Tercera Comunicación Nacional De Colombia a La Convención Marco De Las Naciones Unidas Sobre Cambio Climático (CMNUCC). Tercera Comunicación Nacional de Cambio Climático. IDEAM, PNUD, MADS, DNP, CAN CILLERÍA, FMAM. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/RESUMEN%20EJECUTIVO%20TCNCC%20COLOMBIA%20A%20LA%20CMNUCC%202017.pdf IPCC [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chat terjee, K.L. Ebi, Y .O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P .R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 35-94. MADR (Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural). 2021. Por la cual se adopta el Plan Integral de Gestión del Cambio Climático del Sector Agropecuario – PIGCCS. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/Normatividad/Proyectos%20Normativos/Proyecto%20Normativo%20Cambio%20clim%C3%A1tico%20del%20sector%20agropecuario.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
Under the NAP-Ag programme, FAO supported Colombia in the development of the agricultural components of its adaptation monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system, also known as the Integrated Information System on Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation to Climate Change (SIIVRA). Colombia has integrated adaptation M&E into its broader governance structures. These include the National System for the Evaluation of Management and Results (SINERGIA), which evaluates the National Development Plan; the Colombian Environmental Information System (SIAC), which coordinates environmental data; and the National Climate Change Information System (SNICC), of which SIIVRA is a core component. As outlined in the national Climate Change Law, the SNICC serves as the official coordination system for managing and consolidating data and information from the mitigation MRV system, the adaptation M&E system (SIIVRA), the climate finance MRV system, and the Climate Action Tool. These functions are overseen by the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development and the Colombian Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM). The SIIVRA, in development since 2015, integrates a range of indicators to assess climate change vulnerabilities (sensitivity and adaptive capacity) and risk through a multidimensional analysis aligned with the conceptual framework of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (2014). The system monitors progress in adaptation commitments under Colombia’s NDCs, the implementation of the National Climate Change Policy, and sectoral and territorial strategies such as the Integrated Climate Change Management Plans for the agricultural sector (PIGCCS-Agricultura) to reinforce the efficiency of implemented actions and projects, the impact of adaptation measures and the effectiveness of investments. The SIIVRA is aligned with Colombia's NDC 2020 goals to conceptualise the SNICC by 2025 and implement it by 2030 (Government of Colombia, 2020) To support these efforts, FAO facilitated a workshop that provided technical guidance and reviewed potential indicators and data sources for the adaptation M&E system in the agricultural sector. The workshop brought together representatives from the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, IDEAM, the National Planning Department (DNP), and agricultural producer associations (covering coffee, rice, livestock, sugarcane, cereals, bananas, pigs, forestry, and banking sectors). This was complemented by a rapid analysis of institutional capacities on the adaptation cycle, which identified M&E as one of the most challenging aspects for the agricultural sector (FAO, 2020). Building on these findings, the project carried out a vulnerability and risk analysis across all agricultural sectors—agriculture, forestry, livestock, and aquaculture—and identified relevant indicators (FAO, 2020). The analysis followed the theoretical framework of Colombia’s Third National Communication (IDEAM et al., 2017) and focused on 18 priority value chains. It used historical climate data (1975–2005) and climate projections (2011–2100), downscaled to the municipal level.
3359NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2949107/07/2025 17:30Case study
One of the main challenges in monitoring forest fire-fighting efforts and training effectiveness is the lack of consistent feedback and reporting from local firefighting teams. This inconsistency hinders progress tracking and affects MEL operations. Overcoming this challenge will require the development of stronger reporting mechanisms and the establishment of a structured feedback loop between local responders and MEL coordinators. Despite this, AFDC’s MEL approach highlights the importance of regular evaluation, collaboration with stakeholders, and continuous improvement in ensuring effective fire response strategies. Some of the best practices include: 1. Stakeholder and Community Engagement: the engagement of local authorities, Civil Defense units, and community members in monitoring processes and learning from their feedback is key to ensuring ownership and accountability as well as continuous development. 2. Integration of Geospatial Data for Decision-Making: AFDC is working on mapping its trainings and interventions in order to overlay it with reported fire incidents, in collaboration with partners, to prioritize high-risk areas and measure the geographic impact of MEL-informed actions. This is still in the operationalization phase. 3. Continuous Learning and Adaptation: AFDC is still working on its initiative and its MEL system, where regular refinement are done based on continuous analysis and feedback, which helps in its development and effectiveness.
Civil society
The implementation of the MEL system has significantly improved the capacity of local firefighting teams, enabling them to respond to forest fires more effectively and efficiently. This has resulted in a reduction in the impact of wildfires on forests and local communities. Additionally, AFDC’s team of experts, along with continuous collaboration with national stakeholders, has enhanced training content and response strategies. Regular evaluations have enabled continuous learning and adaptation, ensuring that best practices are incorporated into firefighting efforts. Key outcomes of the MEL system include: 1. Continuous learning which helps tailor and upgrade trainings to enhance local response capacities: o Local firefighting teams and volunteers have demonstrated improved response preparedness and capabilities. o Documentation of best practices and lessons learned, which are shared internally and with national counterparts. o Communities are now better informed and more active in forest fire prevention activities. o Better coordination with Civil Defense and municipal teams during emergency response, leading to more efficient fire suppression. 2. Data-driven approach adjustments: o Training modules were revised based on community and responders’ feedback to address specific knowledge gaps or operational challenges. o Fire-prone areas identified through GIS mapping and incident tracking are now prioritized for capacity building and resource allocation when feasible.
Association for Forests, Development and Conservation
AsiaRegional
Lebanon
Communities07/07/2025 17:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
Due to the increasing threat of forest fires in Lebanon, the Association for Forests, Development and Conservation (AFDC) has developed a robust Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system aimed at enhancing community preparedness, response efficiency, and long-term resilience. This initiative supports the organization’s broader mission of protecting forest ecosystems and strengthening disaster risk reduction capacities, especially in vulnerable rural areas. The MEL system was designed to track the effectiveness of capacity-building efforts, particularly the training of local firefighting teams and volunteers, while providing actionable insights for continuous improvement. It is currently in the operationalization phase, where data collection tools, reporting mechanisms, and feedback loops are being piloted and refined. The MEL system consists of three key components: 1. Indicators – Key performance indicators (KPIs) include quantitative and qualitative metrics such as: o Number and location of training sessions conducted. o Level of knowledge gained, assessed through pre- and post-training evaluations. o Community engagement levels 2. Data Collection Methods – Multiple methods are used to ensure comprehensive data capture: o Field observation reports from AFDC staff and responders’ feedback. o Partnerships with mapping institutions to track fire incidents and response efforts. This includes the use of GIS tools to visualize risk areas and fire affected areas, which helps in identifying response gaps. 3. Stakeholder Engagement – The MEL system is participatory by design, ensuring that: o Local municipalities, Civil Defense units, and community-based organizations are involved in planning, data validation, and feedback processes. o Insights are communicated to national stakeholders, including concerned Ministries, to advocate for policy integration. The MEL framework is not only a tool for accountability and reporting but also a learning mechanism that helps AFDC and its partners identify best practices, scale successful interventions, and adjust strategies based on real-time evidence and community feedback. Ultimately, this system supports a more agile, informed, and locally grounded approach to forest fire risk management in Lebanon.
2656NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://www.gfdrr.org/en/publication/gfdrr-monitoring-evaluation-and-learning-mel-framework;#For further details, the GFDRR Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Framework can be accessed here.
  
2949027/06/2025 07:00Case study
Key insights from the development and testing of the MEL system emphasize the necessity of gender-responsive and rights-based approaches throughout the project cycle. Gender-responsive design must address existing power imbalances, integrate gender-disaggregated data, and engage women and marginalized groups meaningfully. The framework’s success also depends on having clear metrics and well-defined indicators to accurately measure outputs, outcomes, and impacts. A theory of change helps in aligning actions with broader climate and biodiversity goals. Continuous stakeholder engagement, especially involving Indigenous Peoples and local communities, ensures the system reflects diverse needs and priorities. The best practices for this system include inclusive design through stakeholder mapping, regular monitoring and evaluation to facilitate early course corrections, and transparent communication of results to all stakeholders. Adaptive feedback loops are essential for ensuring responsiveness to emerging data and changing conditions, therefore best practices include: iterative MEL processes for real-time feedback and course correction; integration of climate-proofing measures to ensure interventions remain resilient to future climate risks; and open communication of findings to promote transparency, learning, and upscaling.
Civil society
The MEL enables evidence-based decision-making and adaptive management by systematically evaluating intervention performance. s through progress tracking. t facilitates the early identification of implementation gaps and unintended effects through continuous monitoring against baselines and target indicators. The approach incorporates a robust climate risk and vulnerability assessment to inform the prioritization and selection of adaptation options, considering both ecological effectiveness and socioeconomic feasibility. Data collected through direct and proxy indicators are analyzed to measure progress toward specific climate adaptation and biodiversity goals, as articulated in the project’s theory of change. The MEL system further enhances accountability and transparency by enabling regular evaluation and communication of results to all actors, including local communities, Indigenous Peoples, and implementing agencies.
International Union for Conservation of Nature
AsiaGlobal
Practitioners27/06/2025 07:00crmmocservices
Missing information NAbSA - Nature-based Solutions for Climate Adaptation
Capacity building, Climate observations, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentBiodiversity, Gender
crmmocservices
The Nature-based Solutions for Climate Adaptation (NAbSA) Operational Framework focuses on monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) to assess the design and outcomes of climate adaptation interventions. Rooted in the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions and aligned with FEBA criteria, the MEL system enables continuous tracking from project inception through completion. It operationalizes six cross-cutting principles: (1) informed by co-creation with diverse actors; (2) focused on the nature-climate-people nexus; (3) guided by environmental and social risk analysis; (4) rights-based and gender-inclusive; (5) climate-proofed; and (6) aligned with policy frameworks, including the Rio Conventions. The system is structured to use baselines, clearly defined goals, a theory of change, and multidimensional indicators—encompassing ecological, social, and climate dimensions—to assess short-, medium-, and long-term progress and inform adaptive management. By using baseline data, clear goals, and indicators, it monitors both short-term and long-term outcomes while adapting to observed impacts.
2655NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948927/06/2025 07:00Case study
a) A notable strength identified by the evaluations was the participatory development of the Country Programming Frameworks. These frameworks were created through consultations with national governments, civil society organizations, and local communities, ensuring that diverse perspectives were incorporated into programme design. b) The alignment of FAO’s initiatives with national and regional priorities enhanced coherence and effectiveness. The widespread understanding of climate change in the region also contributed to more robust integration of adaptation strategies in programme design. c) Satisfactory internal collaboration (among personnel at FAO headquarters, the FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean and the FAO Subregional Office for the Caribbean) happens when teams are integrated, such as on Disaster Risk Management. d) More robust internal mechanisms for quality assuring project design can facilitate gender mainstreaming and resilience to climate change. e) The lack of permanent FAO offices poses a challenge for all countries that do not have resident representation.
Civil society
In the Dominican Republic, the evaluation found that FAO’s programming generally incorporated climate resilience into interventions, especially within climate-smart livestock and drought resilience initiatives. However, there were gaps in the consistent inclusion of climate action across all projects, partly due to the absence of a clear definition of what constituted climate action. This led to inconsistencies in how different projects interpreted and addressed climate-related goals. In the Caribbean region, the evaluation revealed that the programme was more advanced in mainstreaming climate adaptation than mitigation. Climate change was widely acknowledged as a pressing threat, particularly in terms of rising sea levels, tropical cyclones, and prolonged droughts that affect agriculture, coastal fisheries, and communities. The FAO Subregional Office for the Caribbean responded relatively quickly to emerging demands related to contextual changes, such as the pandemic and recent natural disasters. It supported countries in further adopting an improved systematic disaster risk management that considers not only natural hazards but also pests and diseases.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
Asia, Caribbean and Central America, EuropeLocal, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners27/06/2025 07:00crmmocservices
Evaluation of FAO’s Subregional Office for the Caribbean 2018–2022 https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/7384f282-15b6-483a-9c62-009d0141042d Evaluation of FAO’s Country programme in the Dominican Republic 2018-2022 https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/bfee8e8f-f379-4843-bd67-bf21b785dc30
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentBiodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Heavy industry, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Infrastructure, Services, Tourism, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
The FAO Office of Evaluation (OED) conducted evaluations of FAO’s country programmes in the Dominican Republic and the Caribbean region to assess how and to what extent climate action had been mainstreamed into its strategies and interventions. The aim was to enhance accountability and learning across FAO operations, particularly in the areas of agriculture, food security, ecosystem services, and disaster risk reduction. The evaluations were based on evidence gathered through corporate and country-level monitoring systems, involving consultations with a wide range of local and global stakeholders, as well as triangulation and validation of data. They focused on assessing the degree of integration of climate resilience and transformational adaptation in country-level operations implemented in collaboration with national and local stakeholders.
2654NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948827/06/2025 07:00Case study
The development and deployment of JAMES revealed key lessons related to the design and functionality of M&E systems for adaptation. One of the main challenges was balancing simplicity and accessibility with technical accuracy; many users needed a tool that could be used without extensive or highly accurate data, yet still produce meaningful results. This highlighted a common dilemma in adaptation M&E—ensuring tools are usable in data-scarce environments while maintaining credibility and precision. Additionally, although JAMES was targeted at the Asia-Pacific region, it became clear that the wide diversity in adaptation contexts made it difficult to capture all possible indicators within a single system. This emphasized the importance of flexibility in indicator selection and system design. Furthermore, the experience underscored the need for continuous capacity development and institutional support to ensure that government officers can make the most of such systems. Ultimately, JAMES demonstrated that interactive, user-guided systems can effectively support countries in establishing and improving their M&E frameworks but must be continuously adapted to meet evolving user needs and contextual complexity.
Civil society
The implementation of workshops and hands-on trainings on JAMES has provided developing countries in the Asia-Pacific region with a functional and accessible system for initiating and operationalizing climate change adaptation monitoring and evaluation, contributing to greater accountability and structure in their climate resilience initiatives. So far, practical training was conducted in Thailand and Indonesia, where participants were able to deepen their understanding of adaptation M&E by directly engaging with JAMES. This facilitated their identification of challenges and opportunities for institutionalizing adaptation M&E within their own national contexts. Future improvements to JAMES, regarding both its information handling and functional capabilities, are expected based on feedback from training participants, with the aim of delivering a system that more effectively addresses user requirements.
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
Asia, Pacific/OceaniaLocal, National, Regional
Japan
Policy makers, Practitioners27/06/2025 07:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Education and training, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&EAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Japan Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation System (JAMES) is a web-based tool developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOEJ), to support the monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation efforts, particularly in developing countries. JAMES is designed to record progress in planning and implementation, evaluate the effectiveness of adaptation actions, and ultimately inform better decision-making for resilience-building. The primary users of JAMES are government officials in developing countries, including NAP focal points and those engaged in DRR, development planning, and other adaptation-related policy development at national and local levels. JAMES provides a relevant set of process and output/outcome indicators based on user-provided information such as country, sector, scale, plan type, and scope of work. M&E results are presented as numerical scores, enabling users to monitor temporal changes in scores through consistent use of the system. JAMES is also intended to serve as a learning and capacity development tool, helping developing countries overcome challenges related to limited experience and technical knowledge in conducting M&E. The system is expected to be integrated into adaptation planning and capacity development programs in several countries within the Asia-Pacific region.
2653NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948727/06/2025 07:00Case study
While the system has facilitated large-scale data collection, challenges remain, which are constantly been addressed by progressive improvements and refinements of the Framework and the underlying MEL system. Some key lessons learned and best practices emerged through this engagement are reported here: ● Diversity of approaches: While the concept of ‘resilience’ has been gathering increasing interest in the global community, it is still ill-defined, with many approaches co-existing and much confusion arising in practitioners and decision-makers alike. This can prevent, without sufficient guidance, partners to identify potential impacts clearly, leading to risks of both sub-reporting and over-reporting. ● Data aggregation challenges: Given the heterogeneity of actors and actions, ensuring accurate and comparable data collection is complex. Considering both magnitude and depth of impact is key to differentiate accurately between scalable actions with genuine impact on resilience against potentially with large scope but superficial efforts as well as very profound but ultimately niche experiments. While all contributes to resilience, robust measuring of progress and gaps needs to consider this multi-dimensional approach, which in turn requires deep understanding of what each partners does and how. At the same time, avoiding double counting is a persistent issue when aggregating impact across multiple initiatives: different approaches can be used to correct that, and RtR’s own one has proven quite useful, but they all are strongly reliant on the depth of information provided in reporting. ● Capacity disparities: Partners have different levels of expertise, resources and approaches to data collection and reporting, affecting the consistency of MEL implementation. The RtR has strove to develop a Framework that is both general enough so it can be adapted to different reporting cases while also be adaptable enough to make sense of these differences and allow a meaningful aggregation. In time, it became clear that this required a strong 1-1 interaction with each partner, so that the latter could understand what was asked of them to report, and the RtR’s Technical Secretariat could get enough of a grasp on each strategy so as to interpret and assess them accurately. While this is time-consuming, it is also a strong source of learning for both the Technical Secretariat and the partners, and more streamlined and less time-dependent methodologies were developed as the Campaing progressed, making scalability challenging but possible and deeply relevant to create global capacities and commitment to transparent and accountable climate action. ● Funding and incentives: One of the key reasons behind this gap and diversity in capacities is that MEL in adaptation remains underfunded, limiting the ability to improve and expand monitoring systems. Many partners are seeing themselves daily torn between dedicating limited resources to implementing actions, or reporting on their impact. While streamlining and simplifying methodologies is of strong help -as is building synergies between different MEL systems so as to avoid as much as possible the need for double reporting- more financial commitment to MEL is needed if its potential and relevance are to be deployed fully. Similarly, incentivizing robust data collection and reporting, e.g. through a stronger signaling of quality and reliability of partners and enhanced access to finance, could strengthen overall MEL effectiveness. ● Potential for expansion: While the system currently relies on partner-reported data, there are ongoing discussions about expanding data collection to account for existing secondary sources and other leveraging the power of IA tools to enhance both its comprehensiveness and accuracy, while lowering its resource and time demand. The Framework and MEL are currently only operating within the boundaries of RtR, but a strong collaboration has been made with the SAA to gradually transfer learnings and MEL approaches to this broader platform, while interactions have also been put in place with other global stakeholders (such as UNFCCC, the World Bank and others) to promote uptake of key learnings. Insights have also been provided for the UAE-Belém work programme to help build strong and operationable metrics for global adaptation.
Research institution
The RtR MEL system has enabled improved tracking and reporting of resilience-building efforts across sectors and regions. By providing a structured framework, it allows partners to measure their contributions to global adaptation goals, enhancing transparency and comparability across initiatives. Adopting the ‘people made more resilient’ metrics has been very challenging, but at the same time rewarding as it allows a single, comparable, outlook on very different efforts, while also contributing to put people and communities back in the centre of adaptation and climate action. The platform has strengthened coordination among partners and provided valuable insights into the impact of various adaptation strategies. Given the wide range of actors, actions, and scales involved, this MEL system is built to ensure consistency while accommodating the complexity of the global adaptation landscape. The data collected supports accountability, decision-making, and scaling of adaptation efforts worldwide. Concretely, the results of the MEL system input two main sets of products: a) the yearly progress of the Campaign, usually published at COP with selected highlights sometimes coming earlier in preparation for the event. The report contains figures and numbers on RtR partners, their members, pledges, plans, expected beneficiaries and impacts, and since 2025, for the first time, progress in implementing these pledges and plans. Also, it provides case studies from selected partners, lessons learned, recommendations for the future and key messages to improve climate adaptation. b) the Data Explorer, an interactive, user-friendly web app supporting the RtR Campaign transparency and accountability effort, including informative, interactive data visualizations with a comprehensive view of global campaign efforts with detailed partner-level information. It is the one-stop point to explore information reported by RtR partners, including: campaign-level information with aggregated metrics of progress and impact; partner finder, leading to data sheets with specific information at partner level; solution stories, reported by the partners as highlights of the work they do on the ground; publications and resources on the Framework itself and how to read through the Data Explorer. Moreover, extracts from the MEL outcomes are also often conveyed in other publications and interactions, such as the UNFCCC Yearbook of Global Climate Action, the NAZCA portal, inputs to Climate Weeks, and so on. Finally, the experience from the development and application of the Framework has been key in generating learnings and best practices for the global Adaptation MEL practice, which have been conveyed in knowledge products including: White Papers depicting the Framework, its application and learning; submissions to the GGA and GST discussion and, lately, the UAE-Belém work programme; participation in workshops and stakeholder meetings on these matters. Similarly, close collaboration has been established with other programs from the Climate Champions Team, and most notably the Sharm-el-Sheikh Adaptation Agenda, to transfer key learnings and developments from RtR’s MEL system and ensure alignment between the two efforts.
Center for Climate and Resilience Research
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal
Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector27/06/2025 07:00crmmocservices
Billi, M., Bórquez, R., Varela, J. C., Aldunce, P., Aspee, N., Beauchamp, E., ... & Rojas, M. (2024). A pioneering approach to measure increased resilience to face climate change: insights from the Race to Resilience campaign. Environmental Research Communications, 6(9), 095006. Billi, M., Borquez, R. (2023). RtR Metrics Framework. https://race.cr2.cl/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/RtR-Metrics-Framework-2023.pdf Reporrts and other knowledge products accessible from this web page.
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Technology support, Vulnerability assessmentAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Heavy industry, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Infrastructure, Services, Tourism, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Race to Resilience (RtR) has developed a comprehensive Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system to track progress toward its goal of making 4 billion people more resilient to climate change. This system is designed for non-state actors (NGOs, investors, community organizations, sub-national entities, and other similar partners) and provides a standardized metrics framework that enables the aggregation and comparison of commitments and progress across diverse adaptation initiatives. The Framework is based on a pioneering methodology combining the identification of cross-cutting indicators that act as ‘proxies’ for resilience, in the form of Resilience Attributes and Enabling Conditions, and a set of metrics and aggregation methodologies to assess both the magnitude and the depth of the impact of partners in building resilience for people and communities, with particular care to assess confidence on the information provided and minimize the risk of double counting. Moreover, the MEL system counts with a structured reporting journey, in which the partners are asked different sets of questions at different stages: first, when they apply to enter the campaign, mainly focused to assess their alignment and commitment with RtR’s goals and principles; then, when they formulate pledges on what they aim to build in terms of resilience through their action, and subsequently, on their plans to deliver on said pledges; finally, in terms of how they proceed in implementing pledges and plans, including evidence on achieved outcomes. This journey allows to track progress in different moments, while encouraging a continuous flow of information between partners and the Campaign, as well as progressive learning-by-doing by partners on interacting with the MEL system. The RtR’s Technical Secretariat, hosted by the Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR)2, accompanies the partners throughout the process, with personalized reporting tools and sheets to collect, interchange, and validate information. All the information from partners is stored in a comprehensive Partner File Document which act as a record of the whole journey, which is updated in the different stages of said journey. Partners are allowed at any moment to review past pledges or plans, although all changes are tracked to maintain a history of engagement. An Advisory Body, composed of experts from different continents and backgrounds (scientific, decision-making, practitioners etc.) contributes in offering peer-review on candidate initiatives to enter the RtR as well as giving feedback on the continuous development and improvement of the Metrics, and their positioning and validation in the global arena.
2652NWPSearchableItemmarcobilli@uchile.clTechnical document/report
https://www.cr2.cl/eng/
  
2948601/06/2025 23:30Case study
The development of a simple online reporting tool has improved engagement, while clear and standardized indicators have enhanced data consistency and aggregation. A major challenge has been the integration of transformational adaptation, which is currently captured within broader adaptation tracking rather than as a separate category. The absence of national adaptation targets makes it difficult to assess long-term progress, and resource constraints at the national, regional, and local levels continue to limit the ability of authorities to implement and monitor adaptation actions effectively.
National/public entity
The MEL system enables continuous tracking of adaptation activities across different levels of governance, strengthening government oversight and informing policy decisions. The structured reporting mechanism helps authorities identify gaps and areas for improvement. The Sami Parliament is among the institutions using the system to track their adaptation efforts.
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
EuropeNational
Sweden
Communities, Policy makers01/06/2025 23:30crmmocservices
Climate observations, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Technology supportAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
Sweden has a national system for monitoring and evaluating climate adaptation actions undertaken by national and regional authorities covered by the national ordinance for adaptation. Authorities report annually on their adaptation activities to the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), which analyzes the results and submits a report to the government. Operational since 2019, this system provides structured oversight of national adaptation efforts. Additionally, Sweden is developing a more comprehensive national system for monitoring and evaluating adaptation, with a proposal set to be presented to the government in February 2025.
2648NWPSearchableItemasa.sjostrom@smhi.seTechnical document/report
https://www.smhi.se/en
  
2948501/06/2025 23:30Case study
While the system has facilitated large-scale data collection, challenges remain, which are constantly been addressed by progressive improvements and refinements of the Framework and the underlying MEL system. Some key lessons learned and best practices emerged through this engagement are reported here: Diversity of approaches: While the concept of ‘resilience’ has been gathering increasing interest in the global community, it is still ill-defined, with many approaches co-existing and much confusion arising in practitioners and decision-makers alike. This can prevent, without sufficient guidance, partners to identify potential impacts clearly, leading to risks of both sub-reporting and over-reporting. Data aggregation challenges: Given the heterogeneity of actors and actions, ensuring accurate and comparable data collection is complex. Considering both magnitude and depth of impact is key to differentiate accurately between scalable actions with genuine impact on resilience against potentially with large scope but superficial efforts as well as very profound but ultimately niche experiments. While all contributes to resilience, robust measuring of progress and gaps needs to consider this multi-dimensional approach, which in turn requires deep understanding of what each partners does and how. At the same time, avoiding double counting is a persistent issue when aggregating impact across multiple initiatives: different approaches can be used to correct that, and RtR’s own one has proven quite useful, but they all are strongly reliant on the depth of information provided in reporting. Capacity disparities: Partners have different levels of expertise, resources and approaches to data collection and reporting, affecting the consistency of MEL implementation. The RtR has strove to develop a Framework that is both general enough so it can be adapted to different reporting cases while also be adaptable enough to make sense of these differences and allow a meaningful aggregation. In time, it became clear that this required a strong 1-1 interaction with each partner, so that the latter could understand what was asked of them to report, and the RtR’s Technical Secretariat could get enough of a grasp on each strategy so as to interpret and assess them accurately. While this is time-consuming, it is also a strong source of learning for both the Technical Secretariat and the partners, and more streamlined and less time-dependent methodologies were developed as the Campaing progressed, making scalability challenging but possible and deeply relevant to create global capacities and commitment to transparent and accountable climate action. Funding and incentives: One of the key reasons behind this gap and diversity in capacities is that MEL in adaptation remains underfunded, limiting the ability to improve and expand monitoring systems. Many partners are seeing themselves daily torn between dedicating limited resources to implementing actions, or reporting on their impact. While streamlining and simplifying methodologies is of strong help -as is building synergies between different MEL systems so as to avoid as much as possible the need for double reporting- more financial commitment to MEL is needed if its potential and relevance are to be deployed fully. Similarly, incentivizing robust data collection and reporting, e.g. through a stronger signaling of quality and reliability of partners and enhanced access to finance, could strengthen overall MEL effectiveness. Potential for expansion: While the system currently relies on partner-reported data, there are ongoing discussions about expanding data collection to account for existing secondary sources and other leveraging the power of IA tools to enhance both its comprehensiveness and accuracy, while lowering its resource and time demand. The Framework and MEL are currently only operating within the boundaries of RtR, but a strong collaboration has been made with the SAA to gradually transfer learnings and MEL approaches to this broader platform, while interactions have also been put in place with other global stakeholders (such as UNFCCC, the World Bank and others) to promote uptake of key learnings. Insights have also been provided for the UAE-Belém work programme to help build strong and operationable metrics for global adaptation.
Research institution
The RtR MEL system has enabled improved tracking and reporting of resilience-building efforts across sectors and regions. By providing a structured framework, it allows partners to measure their contributions to global adaptation goals, enhancing transparency and comparability across initiatives. Adopting the ‘people made more resilient’ metrics has been very challenging, but at the same time rewarding as it allows a single, comparable, outlook on very different efforts, while also contributing to put people and communities back in the centre of adaptation and climate action. The platform has strengthened coordination among partners and provided valuable insights into the impact of various adaptation strategies. Given the wide range of actors, actions, and scales involved, this MEL system is built to ensure consistency while accommodating the complexity of the global adaptation landscape. The data collected supports accountability, decision-making, and scaling of adaptation efforts worldwide. Concretely, the results of the MEL system input two main sets of products: the yearly progress of the Campaign, usually published at COP with selected highlights sometimes coming earlier in preparation for the event. The report contains figures and numbers on RtR partners, their members, pledges, plans, expected beneficiaries and impacts, and since 2025, for the first time, progress in implementing these pledges and plans. Also, it provides case studies from selected partners, lessons learned, recommendations for the future and key messages to improve climate adaptation. the Data Explorer, an interactive, user-friendly web app supporting the RtR Campaign transparency and accountability effort, including informative, interactive data visualizations with a comprehensive view of global campaign efforts with detailed partner-level information. It is the one-stop point to explore information reported by RtR partners, including: campaign-level information with aggregated metrics of progress and impact; partner finder, leading to data sheets with specific information at partner level; solution stories, reported by the partners as highlights of the work they do on the ground; publications and resources on the Framework itself and how to read through the Data Explorer. Moreover, extracts from the MEL outcomes are also often conveyed in other publications and interactions, such as the UNFCCC Yearbook of Global Climate Action, the NAZCA portal, inputs to Climate Weeks, and so son. Finally, the experience from the development and application of the Framework has been key in generating learnings and best practices for the global Adaptation MEL practice, which have been conveyed in knowledge products including: White Papers depicting the Framework, its application and learning; submissions to the GGA and GST discussion and, lately, the UAE-Belém work programme; participation in workshops and stakeholder meetings on these matters. Similarly, close collaboration has been established with other programs from the Climate Champions Team, and most notably the Sharm-el-Sheikh Adaptation Agenda, to transfer key learnings and developments from RtR’s MEL system and ensure alignment between the two efforts.
Race to Resilience Technical Secretariat
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners01/06/2025 23:30crmmocservices
Billi, M., Bórquez, R., Varela, J. C., Aldunce, P., Aspee, N., Beauchamp, E., ... & Rojas, M. (2024). A pioneering approach to measure increased resilience to face climate change: insights from the Race to Resilience campaign. Environmental Research Communications, 6(9), 095006. Billi, M., Borquez, R. (2023). RtR Metrics Framework. https://race.cr2.cl/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/RtR-Metrics-Framework-2023.pdf Reporrts and other knowledge products accessible from this web page.
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Education and training, Financial support, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Technology support, Vulnerability assessmentAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Heavy industry, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Tourism, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Race to Resilience (RtR) has developed a comprehensive Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system to track progress toward its goal of making 4 billion people more resilient to climate change. This system is designed for non-state actors (NGOs, investors, community organizations, sub-national entities, and other similar partners) and provides a standardized metrics framework that enables the aggregation and comparison of commitments and progress across diverse adaptation initiatives. The Framework is based on a pioneering methodology combining the identification of cross-cutting indicators that act as ‘proxies’ for resilience, in the form of Resilience Attributes and Enabling Conditions, and a set of metrics and aggregation methodologies to assess both the magnitude and the depth of the impact of partners in building resilience for people and communities, with particular care to assess confidence on the information provided and minimize the risk of double counting. Moreover, the MEL system counts with a structured reporting journey, in which the partners are asked different sets of questions at different stages: first, when they apply to enter the campaign, mainly focused to assess their alignment and commitment with RtR’s goals and principles; then, when they formulate pledges on what they aim to build in terms of resilience through their action, and subsequently, on their plans to deliver on said pledges; finally, in terms of how they proceed in implementing pledges and plans, including evidence on achieved outcomes. This journey allows to track progress in different moments, while encouraging a continuous flow of information between partners and the Campaign, as well as progressive learning-by-doing by partners on interacting with the MEL system. The RtR’s Technical Secretariat, hosted by the Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR)2, accompanies the partners throughout the process, with personalized reporting tools and sheets to collect, interchange, and validate information. All the information from partners is stored in a comprehensive Partner File Document which act as a record of the whole journey, which is updated in the different stages of said journey. Partners are allowed at any moment to review past pledges or plans, although all changes are tracked to maintain a history of engagement. An Advisory Body, composed of experts from different continents and backgrounds (scientific, decision-making, practitioners etc.) contributes in offering peer-review on candidate initiatives to enter the RtR as well as giving feedback on the continuous development and improvement of the Metrics, and their positioning and validation in the global arena.
2647NWPSearchableItemmarcobilli@uchile.clTechnical document/report
https://www.climatechampions.net/campaigns/race-to-resilience/
  
2948401/06/2025 23:30Case study
A major lesson learned is the challenge of data availability for evaluating adaptation progress across various sectors. Gaps in capacity and resources, particularly at subnational levels, remain a key barrier to effective adaptation monitoring. Furthermore, integrating adaptation measures across different administrative levels (national and subnational) presents challenges related to regulations and procedures. A best practice identified in the Adaptation Gap Report is the application of best practices to enhance adaptation effectiveness, in particular by improving the capacity of stakeholders on the ground. UNEP-CCC's transformational adaptation tool has also proven useful in assessing the scalability and impact of changes, providing valuable real-time insights into adaptation planning.
Civil society
Key achievements include the annual production of the Adaptation Gap Reports since 2020, which track progress in adaptation planning, implementation, and means of implementation, in particular adaptation finance at global levels. The reports have provided negotiators and other stakeholders at the UNFCCC COPs with important information, including on the gap in adaptation finance, the levels and quality of adaptation planning, progress in implementing adaptation, as well as a range of other topics, including nature-based solutions, effectiveness of adaptation, loss and damage, and capacity building and technology transfer. In Kenya, the MEL system for climate-smart agriculture has been developed and tested in five counties, while South Africa’s MEL system for monitoring municipal-level early warning systems (MH-EWS) has been tested in two municipalities. Both systems now require scaling to achieve full operationalization. UNEP-CCC’s transformational adaptation tool has been implemented globally to assess the degree of system change, offering a nuanced approach to understanding the transformative impact of climate adaptation actions.
United Nations Environment Programme
AfricaNational
Kenya, South Africa
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners01/06/2025 23:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Impact assessment, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Stakeholder involvementAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation
crmmocservices
The UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (UNEP-CCC) is leading efforts to track and assess global adaptation progress through a series of Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) systems. These systems provide critical insights into the effectiveness of adaptation planning and implementation at the global, national, and subnational levels. The UNEP-CCC’s work involves tracking various sectors, particularly focusing on process indicators such as climate-smart agriculture, early warning systems, and transformational change in adaptation. Key initiatives include the annual Adaptation Gap Report (AGR), which provides updates on global adaptation progress, and MEL systems developed for Kenya and South Africa to monitor climate-smart agriculture and early warning systems (MH-EWS) at the municipal level. Additionally, UNEP-CCC has developed a tool for assessing transformational change in adaptation, which allows for real-time monitoring of progress towards deeper system change.
2646NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948301/06/2025 23:30Case study
Several key lessons and best practices have emerged from the development and initial implementation of Egypt’s MEL framework. A primary insight is the critical importance of aligning the MEL system with both national policies and global frameworks to ensure coherence, avoid redundancy, and facilitate streamlined international reporting. The use of a clear Theory of Change has proven invaluable in structuring the MEL framework, as it explicitly links climate risks, adaptation actions, and expected results, thereby guiding the selection of meaningful indicators and supporting outcome-focused evaluation. A multi-dimensional indicator framework that spans process, output, outcome, and impact levels, and covers a range of sectors water, crops, livestock, soil, biodiversity, disaster risk management, institutional capacity, and food security has enabled a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of adaptation progress. The project has demonstrated that sustained capacity building is essential for MEL success; ongoing training and support for local institutions, extension officers, and farmers promote data quality, ownership, and practical use of MEL findings. The framework’s design as a living, adaptable document allows Egypt to refine its approach over time in response to new data, evolving technologies, and emerging climate challenges. Leveraging digital tools for data collection and analysis has also emerged as a best practice, enhancing efficiency and accessibility. Engaging communities and institutions actively in MEL processes has strengthened the relevance and accuracy of data and facilitated adaptive learning. Finally, explicitly incorporating food security and nutrition outcomes highlights the social dimensions of adaptation and ensures that interventions support the most vulnerable populations, reinforcing the broader goals of sustainable development and resilience.
Civil society
The establishment of Egypt’s MEL framework has resulted in several significant outcomes. Firstly, it provides a systematic and coherent approach to monitor and evaluate adaptation interventions in agrifood systems, helping to reduce vulnerabilities and build climate resilience. The framework’s strong alignment with Egypt’s NDCs, NCCS, and international agreements such as the GGA, SDGs, and SFDRR improves policy coherence and enhances Egypt’s capacity for international reporting, positioning the country as an active contributor to global adaptation tracking initiatives. Capacity development has been a core outcome, with national stakeholders including institutions, communities, and farmers gaining technical training and resources necessary for effective data collection, analysis, and reporting. This has laid the foundation for sustained MEL implementation across sectors. Moreover, the MEL framework acts as a critical tool supporting Egypt’s ongoing National Adaptation Plan processes by facilitating evidence-based planning, implementation, and reporting of climate adaptation measures. Through data-driven insights provided by the framework’s indicators, decision-makers can prioritize investments and refine adaptation strategies with greater precision. Importantly, the framework is designed for continuous learning and improvement, enabling iterative testing of indicators, better data system integration, and greater local participation in adaptation tracking. Collectively, these outcomes advance Egypt’s climate adaptation agenda and enhance resilience in its vital agrifood systems.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
AfricaNational
Egypt
Policy makers, Practitioners01/06/2025 23:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Monitoring and evaluation/M&EAgriculture
crmmocservices
This case study highlights Egypt’s development of a comprehensive national Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) framework to systematically track climate adaptation progress within its agrifood systems. Spearheaded by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) through the SCALA programme, the MEL framework supports Egypt in assessing the effectiveness of its adaptation actions, informing policy and investment decisions, and fulfilling both national and international reporting obligations. Aligned with Egypt’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), and global frameworks such as the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), the MEL framework provides a coherent and integrative approach to adaptation tracking. It addresses critical climate risk drivers in Egypt’s agrifood sector—water scarcity, extreme weather, land degradation, rising temperatures, and biodiversity loss—by focusing on key adaptation priorities including water management, crop and livestock resilience, soil health, disaster preparedness, biodiversity protection, and capacity strengthening. Underpinned by a Theory of Change, the MEL framework employs a robust set of indicators spanning adaptation actions, outcomes, and impacts. These indicators measure changes in water efficiency, crop yields, livestock productivity, soil and land health, biodiversity conservation, disaster risk management, institutional capacity, and poverty and food security outcomes. The framework is designed to be a living system, adaptable over time with continued refinement and integration into Egypt’s National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes.
2645NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948201/06/2025 23:30Case study
The agricultural sector has been a key driver in advancing Colombia’s national adaptation M&E system. This work has not only strengthened institutional reporting processes within the sector but has also fostered greater collaboration between the agricultural and environmental sectors, laying a strong foundation for a more integrated, coordinated, and effective national response to climate change. Colombia’s approach offers key lessons: leveraging existing governance structures strengthens adaptation reporting, while integrating SIIVRA into SNICC promotes policy alignment and coherence through an integrated approach to climate change. A strong theoretical foundation, drawing on the TNC results and aligned with the IPCC’s risk framework, enhances the credibility of these efforts. The development of adaptation indicators specific to the agriculture sector and the focus on data readiness and availability at municipal level are critical for capturing locally relevant information that supports informed decision-making and evaluation of the impact of ongoing adaptation measures within priority value chains. Stakeholder engagement was critical, involving government agencies, research institutions, and producer associations. Their participation supported local adaptation planning and encouraged private-sector investment. Notably, the development of a certification scheme for climate-adapted agriculture provides a participatory incentive-based mechanism and MEL tool for mainstreaming adaptation practices, planning and investments at local level. However, challenges persist in integrating diverse data sources across governance levels. Fully incorporating agricultural adaptation indicators into MADR’s reporting requires improved data management and capacity-building. Clearer institutional roles for data collection, storage, and analysis, particularly between MADR and external partners are also needed.
Civil society
Colombia has made significant progress in the development of a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system for the agricultural sector. With the support provided through the NAP-Ag programme, a comprehensive set of 66 indicators has been identified to inform adaptation planning and decision-making across the sector, including 28 indicators for hazards, 23 for sensitivity, and 15 for adaptive capacity. These indicators were selected to capture the multifaceted nature of climate risks and vulnerabilities across 18 priority agricultural subsectors. They provide a foundation for integrating sector-specific data into Colombia’s national adaptation M&E system (SIIVRA), enabling the tracking of progress, the evaluation of outcomes, and the identification of strategic investments for a climate-resilient agriculture. These indicators include measures of changes in optimal agro-climatic conditions for each value chain; the contraction or expansion of areas suitable for key crops; the share of agriculture in regional GDP; poverty and aridity levels; the proportion of insured agricultural land; and the number of people or areas affected by floods and other extreme events. Adaptive capacity indicators cover factors such as the adoption of good agricultural practices, the availability of agricultural extension services and technical assistance, public investment in food security, water use efficiency, and the coverage of protected areas, among others. The selection process built on existing work, with 45 of the 66 indicators drawn directly from the 113 indicators used in Colombia’s Third National Communication (TNC) and 21 new indicators added to comprehensively cover the agricultural sectors. Indicators were selected based on criteria established in the TNC, including data availability for relevant time periods, the ability to disaggregate data to the departmental and municipal levels, engagement of local stakeholders in data collection, and reliance on official and regularly measured data sources (IDEAM et al., 2017). For each indicator, the data source, method of calculation, frequency of measurement, and intended use were clearly defined guiding locally relevant information. The results of the vulnerability and risk analysis have already been used to inform the selection of priority adaptation measures in the PIGCCS-Agricultura (MADR, 2021). This work has also laid the groundwork for Colombia’s first pilot certification in climate-adapted agriculture under the SCALA programme. This innovative certification is structured around four key components—soil, water, agroecosystems, and biodiversity and ecosystem services—and is informed by the results of the risk and vulnerability analysis, which were translated into 32 detailed assessments at the departmental level. The certification aims to recognize and support the adaptation efforts of small and medium-scale farmers through a participatory, locally tailored monitoring, evaluation, and learning tool. This tool guides evidence-based decision-making and fosters investments that promote adaptive pathways at the farm cluster level, in line with national priorities. These results will feed directly into the MEL platform currently being developed within FAO’s Colombia Climate Change Platform.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
South AmericaLocal, National
Colombia
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners01/06/2025 23:30crmmocservices
FAO. 2020. Resultados preliminares del análisis de capacidades de adaptación en subsectores de agropecuarios. Unpublished. Government of Colombia. 2020. Actualización de la Contribución Determinada a Nivel Nacional de Colombia (NDC). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/NDC%20actualizada%20de%20Colombia.pdf IDEAM, PNUD, MADS, DNP, CANCILLERÍA. 2017. Tercera Comunicación Nacional De Colombia a La Convención Marco De Las Naciones Unidas Sobre Cambio Climático (CMNUCC). Tercera Comunicación Nacional de Cambio Climático. IDEAM, PNUD, MADS, DNP, CAN CILLERÍA, FMAM. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/RESUMEN%20EJECUTIVO%20TCNCC%20COLOMBIA%20A%20LA%20CMNUCC%202017.pdf IPCC [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chat terjee, K.L. Ebi, Y .O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P .R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 35-94. MADR (Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural). 2021. Por la cual se adopta el Plan Integral de Gestión del Cambio Climático del Sector Agropecuario – PIGCCS. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/Normatividad/Proyectos%20Normativos/Proyecto%20Normativo%20Cambio%20clim%C3%A1tico%20del%20sector%20agropecuario.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
Under the NAP-Ag programme, FAO supported Colombia in the development of the agricultural components of its adaptation monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system, also known as the Integrated Information System on Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation to Climate Change (SIIVRA). Colombia has integrated adaptation M&E into its broader governance structures. These include the National System for the Evaluation of Management and Results (SINERGIA), which evaluates the National Development Plan; the Colombian Environmental Information System (SIAC), which coordinates environmental data; and the National Climate Change Information System (SNICC), of which SIIVRA is a core component. As outlined in the national Climate Change Law, the SNICC serves as the official coordination system for managing and consolidating data and information from the mitigation MRV system, the adaptation M&E system (SIIVRA), the climate finance MRV system, and the Climate Action Tool. These functions are overseen by the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development and the Colombian Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM). The SIIVRA, in development since 2015, integrates a range of indicators to assess climate change vulnerabilities (sensitivity and adaptive capacity) and risk through a multidimensional analysis aligned with the conceptual framework of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (2014). The system monitors progress in adaptation commitments under Colombia’s NDCs, the implementation of the National Climate Change Policy, and sectoral and territorial strategies such as the Integrated Climate Change Management Plans for the agricultural sector (PIGCCS-Agricultura) to reinforce the efficiency of implemented actions and projects, the impact of adaptation measures and the effectiveness of investments. The SIIVRA is aligned with Colombia's NDC 2020 goals to conceptualise the SNICC by 2025 and implement it by 2030 (Government of Colombia, 2020) To support these efforts, FAO facilitated a workshop that provided technical guidance and reviewed potential indicators and data sources for the adaptation M&E system in the agricultural sector. The workshop brought together representatives from the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, IDEAM, the National Planning Department (DNP), and agricultural producer associations (covering coffee, rice, livestock, sugarcane, cereals, bananas, pigs, forestry, and banking sectors). This was complemented by a rapid analysis of institutional capacities on the adaptation cycle, which identified M&E as one of the most challenging aspects for the agricultural sector (FAO, 2020). Building on these findings, the project carried out a vulnerability and risk analysis across all agricultural sectors—agriculture, forestry, livestock, and aquaculture—and identified relevant indicators (FAO, 2020). The analysis followed the theoretical framework of Colombia’s Third National Communication (IDEAM et al., 2017) and focused on 18 priority value chains. It used historical climate data (1975–2005) and climate projections (2011–2100), downscaled to the municipal level.
2644NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948130/05/2025 16:30Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists30/05/2025 16:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2642NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2948030/05/2025 15:30Case study
One of the main challenges in monitoring forest fire-fighting efforts and training effectiveness is the lack of consistent feedback and reporting from local firefighting teams. This inconsistency hinders progress tracking and affects MEL operations. Overcoming this challenge will require the development of stronger reporting mechanisms and the establishment of a structured feedback loop between local responders and MEL coordinators. Despite this, AFDC’s MEL approach highlights the importance of regular evaluation, collaboration with stakeholders, and continuous improvement in ensuring effective fire response strategies. Some of the best practices include: Stakeholder and Community Engagement: the engagement of local authorities, Civil Defense units, and community members in monitoring processes and learning from their feedback is key to ensuring ownership and accountability as well as continuous development. Integration of Geospatial Data for Decision-Making: AFDC is working on mapping its trainings and interventions in order to overlay it with reported fire incidents, in collaboration with partners, to prioritize high-risk areas and measure the geographic impact of MEL-informed actions. This is still in the operationalization phase. Continuous Learning and Adaptation: AFDC is still working on its initiative and its MEL system, where regular refinement are done based on continuous analysis and feedback, which helps in its development and effectiveness.
Civil society
The implementation of the MEL system has significantly improved the capacity of local firefighting teams, enabling them to respond to forest fires more effectively and efficiently. This enhanced response capability has led to a measurable reduction in the impact of wildfires on both forests and local communities. In parallel, AFDC’s team of experts, working in continuous collaboration with national stakeholders, has contributed to refining training content and strengthening response strategies. Regular evaluations built into the MEL system have facilitated ongoing learning and adaptation, ensuring that best practices are consistently integrated into firefighting efforts. Among the key outcomes of the MEL system is the promotion of continuous learning, which has allowed training programs to be tailored and upgraded to better match the evolving needs of local response teams. As a result, local firefighting teams and volunteers have demonstrated marked improvements in their preparedness and operational capabilities. Additionally, the system has supported the documentation of best practices and lessons learned, which are regularly shared both internally within AFDC and externally with national counterparts to foster broader impact. Communities have become more informed and engaged in forest fire prevention efforts, showing increased participation in preparedness activities. Moreover, coordination with Civil Defense and municipal teams during emergency responses has improved, resulting in more efficient and cohesive fire suppression operations. The MEL system has also enabled a more data-driven approach to program refinement. Training modules have been revised based on feedback from communities and responders to address identified knowledge gaps and operational challenges. Furthermore, fire-prone areas identified through GIS mapping and incident tracking are now prioritized for capacity building and resource allocation whenever feasible. This targeted approach ensures that resources are deployed where they are most needed, contributing to a more resilient and responsive forest fire management framework in Lebanon.
Association for Forests, Development and Conservation
AsiaRegional
Lebanon
Communities30/05/2025 15:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
Due to the increasing threat of forest fires in Lebanon, the Association for Forests, Development and Conservation (AFDC) has developed a robust Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) system aimed at enhancing community preparedness, response efficiency, and long-term resilience. This initiative supports the organization’s broader mission of protecting forest ecosystems and strengthening disaster risk reduction capacities, especially in vulnerable rural areas. The MEL system was designed to track the effectiveness of capacity-building efforts, particularly the training of local firefighting teams and volunteers, while providing actionable insights for continuous improvement. It is currently in the operationalization phase, where data collection tools, reporting mechanisms, and feedback loops are being piloted and refined. The MEL system consists of three key components. The first is indicators, which include key performance indicators (KPIs) made up of both quantitative and qualitative metrics such as the number and location of training sessions conducted, the level of knowledge gained—assessed through pre- and post-training evaluations—and overall community engagement levels. The second component involves data collection methods, with multiple approaches employed to ensure comprehensive data capture. These include field observation reports from AFDC staff, feedback from responders, and partnerships with mapping institutions to track fire incidents and response efforts. The use of GIS tools allows for the visualization of risk areas and fire-affected zones, helping to identify response gaps. The third component is stakeholder engagement, with the MEL system being participatory by design. Local municipalities, Civil Defense units, and community-based organizations are actively involved in planning, data validation, and feedback processes, while insights generated through the system are communicated to national stakeholders, including relevant ministries, to advocate for policy integration. Overall, the MEL framework is not only a tool for accountability and reporting, but also serves as a learning mechanism that enables AFDC and its partners to identify best practices, scale successful interventions, and adjust strategies based on real-time evidence and community feedback. Ultimately, this system supports a more agile, informed, and locally grounded approach to forest fire risk management in Lebanon.
2643NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947912/05/2025 14:30Case study
Impacts of the fair were measured through an online survey distributed after the event and registered several positive feedback, commenting on how the event has enabled to initiate conversations with other mountainous areas sharing similar issues, for the identification of common solutions. Follow-up activities will be required in order to further facilitate this exchange.
Civil society
The Mountain Innovation Fair offered an opportunity to share on common or differing issues among the 65 international participants from South Caucasus, East Africa, Southern Africa, European Alps, Carpathians, South-Eastern Europe. The participants contributed with 30 innovative approaches displayed at the fair. Diverse solutions for mountain areas were presented, such as upcycling wool projects in substitution to plastic bottles in Armenia, or the mohair production and beekeeping providing sustainable development pathways for rural women in Lesotho. These participants were screened by a Selection Committee composed of regional experts, from Southern Africa, East Africa, the Caucasus, Balkans, Carpathians and Alps to learn from each other about innovative approaches advancing sustainable mountain development. Highlights included an inspiring PeakTalk, the colourful marketplace where exhibitors displayed their innovations work, products, and technologies and small group workshops co-creating innovative approaches in a fictive scenario. Participants voted on the winner of the Mountain Innovation Award, which was presented to the innovation “Removing barriers from Upscaling Beekeeping and wool and Mohair production”. The winning innovation was made available a seed corn funding to invest in advancing their activities.
United Nations University
Africa, Asia, EuropeGlobal, Local, Regional, Transboundary
Italy
Academics and scientists, Communities, Practitioners, Private sector12/05/2025 14:30crmmocservices
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Energy, Food security, Gender, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Services, Tourism, Water resources
crmmocservices
A collaborative space sharing the spirit of innovation for climate change adaptation and sustainable mountain development. The event was hosted at Eurac Research by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations University through the UNU-EHS Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS) programme, with funding from the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC). The First Mountain Innovation Fair offered a buzzing, interactive and collaborative workspace to exchange on challenges and successes of innovative approaches, with lively discussions and practical demonstrations. Out-of-the box thinking, novel approaches and facilitating wider access to innovations have been the core of the Fair. Meet your peers, learn about and co-create mountain innovations with a potential for replication in various regions and contexts. https://www.eurac.edu/en/institutes-centers/center-for-global-mountain-safeguard-research/news-events/mountain-innovation-fair-2023”
2641NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947811/05/2025 22:00Case study
The report, peer-reviewed by over 65 subject experts, ensures high credibility and policy relevance. It emphasizes the urgency of climate action, stressing the immediate need to mitigate the long-term effects of climate change on glaciers and water resources, and to make adaptation plans commensurate with scientific projections of future glacier and snowpack loss, as well as ice sheet loss and sea-level rise affecting coastal communities. The report calls for stronger policies and mitigation efforts to protect mountain and low-lying communities and ensure sustainable water management. It also identifies 15 million people at risk from glacial lake outburst floods, prompting the need for urgent risk mitigation strategies. Additionally, the report raises awareness of the vulnerability of hydropower in high-altitude regions, influencing policy discussions on the future of renewable energy in these areas.
Civil society
The report has informed climate policy and research by presenting the latest scientific consensus on glacier, ice sheet, and snow loss as well as permafrost thaw. It highlights the severe threats to downstream water security, urging the implementation of adaptation strategies in agriculture, energy, and drinking water systems. The report has also increased awareness of catastrophic risks, such as glacial lake outburst floods, permafrost collapse and infrastructure damage, and long-term sea0-level rise; prompting further study and mitigation planning. Additionally, it has influenced policy discussions on hydropower security, emphasizing the climate-induced vulnerabilities facing energy infrastructure in high-altitude regions.
International Cryosphere Climate Initiative
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal, National, Transboundary
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector11/05/2025 22:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Education and training, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentCoastal areas/zones, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystems, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The State of the Cryosphere Report (2024), is the latest in an annual series published by the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative (ICCI), beginning in 2019. It presents the latest scientific consensus on temperature impacts on mountain and polar regions containing snow, ice, and permafrost, as well as both polar oceans. Peer-reviewed by over 65 subject experts, including over two dozen IPCC authors, the report provides an in-depth analysis of how climate change is accelerating ice loss and its cascading effects on water resources, communities, and infrastructure. The report warns that even at 2°C warming, extensive and irreversible ice loss will occur across many of the world’s glaciers, leading to dramatic reductions in snow cover and glacier-fed water sources, as well as long-term sea-level rise from melting polar ice sheets, and non-survivable acidification levels in portions of both polar oceans and fisheries. The consequences will be particularly severe for downstream river basins and low-lying regions, impacting agriculture, drinking water, and hydropower in vulnerable regions such as the Tarim Basin in China and the Indus River Basin. Additionally, the report highlights the growing risk of catastrophic events, including landslides, ice shears, and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), which now threaten an estimated 15 million people globally, particularly in High Mountain Asia and Peru.
2640NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947711/05/2025 22:00Case study
INMIP has pioneered a horizontal learning and walking workshop methodology that builds on indigenous learning traditions, centers traditional knowledge and recognizes Indigenous Peoples as experts. In this empowering methodology, Indigenous Peoples themselves are the teachers, rather than external experts, and the landscape in the classroom. This approach has enabled Indigenous Peoples to exchange practical know-how and solutions, to revalue and reaffirm the importance of their traditional knowledge and cultural and spiritual values, and to establish solidarity networks with other remote mountain communities locally and globally. INMIP learning exchanges in the Potato Park have enabled the sharing of the Park’s many successful innovations for agrobiodiversity conservation, climate resilience, food security and community empowerment, rights and self-governance, and has inspired other mountain communities to establish similar biocultural territories. The network has highlighted the critical importance of seed and knowledge exchange between communities to strengthen capacity for climate adaptation.
Civil society
Through six global learning exchanges, INMIP has significantly enhanced the capacity of mountain Indigenous Peoples in 14 countries to revitalize and protect biocultural heritage and enhance resilience to climate change. Through horizontal knowledge exchange, communities have learnt about strategies and tools to address common challenges, such as how to reverse the loss of traditional knowledge, cultural values, languages and agrobiodiversity, how to conserve water resources and deal with increased drought and erratic rainfall and increased pests and diseases, how to strengthen their territorial and resource rights and management systems, and how strengthen biocultural economies. These efforts have led to strengthened climate resilience in mountain communities, including enhanced agrobiodiversity, food security and livelihoods. Additionally, the advocacy work has enhanced understanding of the importance of traditional knowledge, agrobiodiversity and biocultural heritage and traditional mountain territories for climate resilience, adaptation and mitigation, amongst policy makers.
International Network for Bamboo and Rattan
Africa, Asia, South AmericaGlobal, National, Regional
Bhutan, Bolivia, China, India, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Mexico and Nepal
Communities, Policy makers11/05/2025 22:00crmmocservices
The Huaran Declaration: Indigenous Peoples are the real solutions to the climate and biodiversity crises | IIED Publications Library Declaration of the International Network of Mountain Indigenous Peoples (INMIP): Indigenous Food Solutions to the Climate Crisis | IIED Publications Library Resilient Biocultural Heritage Landscapes for Sustainable Mountain Development | IIED Publications Library Traditional mountain landscapes: crucial for meeting biodiversity and climate targets: 21241iied.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The International Network of Mountain Indigenous Peoples (INMIP) is a global network of mountain communities and local organizations with members in 14 countries across Latin America, Asia, and Africa. The network aims to strengthen climate resilience of vulnerable mountain communities by revitalizing and protecting biocultural heritage through capacity building, knowledge exchange, and policy engagement. Since 2014, INMIP has organized six global community-to-community knowledge exchanges (walking workshops), where mountain communities analyze the impacts of climate change and share adaptation strategies: in Bhutan (2014), Tajikistan (2015), China (2016), Peru (2017), Kyrgyzstan (2018), and Peru (2024). These events also involved dialogues with policy makers. Inspired by the Potato Park in Peru, INMIP is establishing a global network of biocultural heritage territories to protect mountain ecosystems and agrobiodiversity for climate resilience. The 6th global learning exchange and training workshop on biocultural territories took place in Potato Park from May 30 to June 4, 2024. INMIP’s goals are: 1. to enable global coordination between biocultural heritage territories established by mountain indigenous communities, and strengthen capacity to establish biocultural territories; 2. to strengthen the resilience and climate adaptation capacity of mountain IP&LCs, and exchange knowledge in an intergenerational and intercultural vision 3. to promote inclusive policies in favor of mountain indigenous peoples and biocultural heritage at local, national and international levels.
2639NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947611/05/2025 22:00Case study
A key good practice is the co-production of knowledge, where indigenous communities and researchers work together to document and preserve traditional practices, ensuring the relevance of climate adaptation strategies. By incorporating traditional ecological calendars into broader adaptation planning, these communities can better adapt to climate change by syncing their grazing and migration patterns with natural rhythms. Cross-border collaboration has proven to be essential in strengthening climate adaptation efforts, with the sharing of knowledge across Tajikistan, Afghanistan, China, and Kyrgyzstan promoting regional cooperation. The documentation and preservation of traditional ecological knowledge ensure that valuable insights into sustainable resource use are passed on to future generations, supporting long-term resilience in the face of climate change.
As a result of this initiative, indigenous herders have been able to adjust their grazing and migration patterns based on updated climate impact assessments, improving their resilience to climate change. The preservation of traditional knowledge through the documentation process ensures that it remains available for future generations, contributing to long-term climate adaptation. Local governments and international organizations have integrated traditional knowledge into broader climate adaptation policies, ensuring these strategies are more contextually appropriate and sustainable. Furthermore, the initiative has strengthened regional cooperation by fostering a knowledge-sharing platform across borders, enhancing international solidarity and collective action to address the climate challenges faced by mountain communities in the Pamir Mountains
Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography
AsiaNational
Afghanistan, China, Kyrgystan
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector11/05/2025 22:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
This initiative focuses on the documentation of traditional practices by recording seasonal grazing patterns, herding practices, and the traditional ecological calendar used in the Pamir Mountains. These efforts are aimed at preserving indigenous knowledge and adapting it to modern climate adaptation strategies. Climate impact assessments are also carried out, particularly focusing on how shifting phenological patterns are affecting grazing patterns and vegetation in the region. The project works closely with local herders to integrate their traditional knowledge into national and regional climate adaptation policies, ensuring their practices align with current environmental changes. Additionally, the project fosters cross-border collaboration between stakeholders in Tajikistan, Afghanistan, China, and Kyrgyzstan, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and best practices for sustainable resource use and adaptation.
2638NWPSearchableItemwangyue@mail.kib.ac.cnTechnical document/report
NOT AVAILABLE
  
2947525/04/2025 16:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists25/04/2025 16:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2636NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947425/04/2025 16:00Case study
INMIP has pioneered a horizontal learning and walking workshop methodology that builds on indigenous learning traditions, centers traditional knowledge and recognizes Indigenous Peoples as experts. In this empowering methodology, Indigenous Peoples themselves are the teachers, rather than external experts, and the landscape in the classroom. This approach has enabled Indigenous Peoples to exchange practical know-how and solutions, to revalue and reaffirm the importance of their traditional knowledge and cultural and spiritual values, and to establish solidarity networks with other remote mountain communities locally and globally. INMIP learning exchanges in the Potato Park have enabled the sharing of the Park’s many successful innovations for agrobiodiversity conservation, climate resilience, food security and community empowerment, rights and self-governance, and has inspired other mountain communities to establish similar biocultural territories. The network has highlighted the critical importance of seed and knowledge exchange between communities to strengthen capacity for climate adaptation.
Civil society
Through six global learning exchanges, INMIP has significantly enhanced the capacity of mountain Indigenous Peoples in 14 countries to revitalize and protect biocultural heritage and enhance resilience to climate change. Through horizontal knowledge exchange, communities have learnt about strategies and tools to address common challenges, such as how to reverse the loss of traditional knowledge, cultural values, languages and agrobiodiversity, how to conserve water resources and deal with increased drought and erratic rainfall and increased pests and diseases, how to strengthen their territorial and resource rights and management systems, and how strengthen biocultural economies. These efforts have led to strengthened climate resilience in mountain communities, including enhanced agrobiodiversity, food security and livelihoods. Additionally, the advocacy work has enhanced understanding of the importance of traditional knowledge, agrobiodiversity and biocultural heritage and traditional mountain territories for climate resilience, adaptation and mitigation, amongst policy makers.
International Institute for Environment and Development
Africa, Asia, South AmericaGlobal, Local
Bhutan, Bolivia, China, India, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Taiwan,  Tajikistan, Thailand, Mexico and Nepal
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers25/04/2025 16:00crmmocservices
The Huaran Declaration: Indigenous Peoples are the real solutions to the climate and biodiversity crises | IIED Publications Library Declaration of the International Network of Mountain Indigenous Peoples (INMIP): Indigenous Food Solutions to the Climate Crisis | IIED Publications Library Resilient Biocultural Heritage Landscapes for Sustainable Mountain Development | IIED Publications Library Traditional mountain landscapes: crucial for meeting biodiversity and climate targets: 21241iied.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
The International Network of Mountain Indigenous Peoples (INMIP) is a global network of mountain communities and local organizations with members in 14 countries across Latin America, Asia, and Africa. The network aims to strengthen climate resilience of vulnerable mountain communities by revitalizing and protecting biocultural heritage through capacity building, knowledge exchange, and policy engagement. Since 2014, INMIP has organized six global community-to-community knowledge exchanges (walking workshops), where mountain communities analyze the impacts of climate change and share adaptation strategies: in Bhutan (2014), Tajikistan (2015), China (2016), Peru (2017), Kyrgyzstan (2018), and Peru (2024). These events also involved dialogues with policy makers. Inspired by the Potato Park in Peru, INMIP is establishing a global network of biocultural heritage territories to protect mountain ecosystems and agrobiodiversity for climate resilience. The 6th global learning exchange and training workshop on biocultural territories took place in Potato Park from May 30 to June 4, 2024. INMIP’s goals are: • to enable global coordination between biocultural heritage territories established by mountain indigenous communities, and strengthen capacity to establish biocultural territories; • to strengthen the resilience and climate adaptation capacity of mountain IP&LCs, and exchange knowledge in an intergenerational and intercultural vision, and • to promote inclusive policies in favor of mountain indigenous peoples and biocultural heritage at local, national and international levels.
2635NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947322/04/2025 09:30Case study
Impacts of the fair were measured through an online survey distributed after the event and registered several positive feedback, commenting on how the event has enabled to initiate conversations with other mountainous areas sharing similar issues, for the identification of common solutions. Follow-up activities will be required in order to further facilitate this exchange.
Civil society
The Mountain Innovation Fair offered an opportunity to share on common or differing issues among the 65 international participants from South Caucasus, East Africa, Southern Africa, European Alps, Carpathians, South-Eastern Europe. The participants contributed with 30 innovative approaches displayed at the fair. Diverse solutions for mountain areas were presented, such as upcycling wool projects in substitution to plastic bottles in Armenia, or the mohair production and beekeeping providing sustainable development pathways for rural women in Lesotho. These participants were screened by a Selection Committee composed of regional experts, from Southern Africa, East Africa, the Caucasus, Balkans, Carpathians and Alps to learn from each other about innovative approaches advancing sustainable mountain development. Highlights included an inspiring PeakTalk, the colourful marketplace where exhibitors displayed their innovations work, products, and technologies and small group workshops co-creating innovative approaches in a fictive scenario. Participants voted on the winner of the Mountain Innovation Award, which was presented to the innovation “Removing barriers from Upscaling Beekeeping and wool and Mohair production”. The winning innovation was made available a seed corn funding to invest in advancing their activities.
United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security
EuropeGlobal, Local, Regional, Transboundary
Italy
Academics and scientists, Practitioners, Private sector22/04/2025 09:30crmmocservices
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Energy, Food security, Gender, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Services, Tourism, Water resources
crmmocservices
A collaborative space sharing the spirit of innovation for climate change adaptation and sustainable mountain development. The event was hosted at Eurac Research by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations University through the UNU-EHS Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS) programme, with funding from the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC). The First Mountain Innovation Fair offered a buzzing, interactive and collaborative workspace to exchange on challenges and successes of innovative approaches, with lively discussions and practical demonstrations. Out-of-the box thinking, novel approaches and facilitating wider access to innovations have been the core of the Fair. Meet your peers, learn about and co-create mountain innovations with a potential for replication in various regions and contexts. https://www.eurac.edu/en/institutes-centers/center-for-global-mountain-safeguard-research/news-events/mountain-innovation-fair-2023”
2634NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947222/04/2025 09:30Case study
Climate Risk Assessment - Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan - Sebou Catchment, Morocco - Madagascar https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/climate-risk-assessment-management/climate-risk-sourcebook/ Peru: Supporting the proposal of a GCF project: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/eco_gcf-in-peru-boosting-the-climate-resilience-activity-7171198555754369024-ymH5/ and leading to recommendations for NbS: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411523000423?via%3Dihub
Civil society
The main result of the application of this guideline is an improved disaster risk reduction / climate change adaptation based on a participatory approach engaging key risk owners. Major outcomes of applying this approach in practice: - risk analysis reports - indicators for monitoring & evaluation - lists of potential CCA options - climate risk communication strategy
United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central AmericaLocal, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Morocco, Madagascar
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Practitioners22/04/2025 09:30crmmocservices
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Heavy industry, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Infrastructure, Services, Tourism, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
There is an increasing demand by communities, practitioners and policy makers for actionable approaches for climate risk assessment in the context of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) that are both easy to understand and apply and are taking into account complex, multiple, interconnected and cascading root causes, drivers and vulnerabilities. Responding to this demand, Eurac Research & UNU-EHS together with their partners have developed a “Climate Risk Sourcebook” (CR-SB). This Sourcebook has been written in from of a technical guideline. It provides a conceptual framework for a comprehensive Climate Risk Analysis and Assessment together with modular instructions, divided in eight modules. It can be used: • as a ‘beginners guide’ on Climate Risk Assessments, • for a rapid risk assessment at a sub‐national to local scale, to obtain an overview of the most relevant climate risks, or to prepare a more in‐depth risk assessment and/or • for training purposes. These guidelines are designed to be consistent with the most recent IPCC report (AR6). They underline the significance to look into external risk drivers as well as impact/risk cascades and systemic risks by applying the concept of climate risk impact chains. A specific chapter is dedicated to the question in how far Climate Risk Assessments inform Climate Risk Management (CRM) by defining entry points for Climate Change Adaptation (CCA). Particular emphasis is given to the approach of stakeholder engagement as well as the consideration of gender issues and differential vulnerabilities. The guidelines have been applied in many regions and contexts worldwide.
2633NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2947117/04/2025 10:00Case study
Scientific assessments and policy reports enhance understanding of climate change impacts in high-altitude regions, providing a foundation for informed decision-making and policy development. Publishing climate adaptation reports and case studies on mountain ecosystems strengthens evidence-based adaptation strategies and promotes knowledge sharing. Effective outreach and dissemination efforts raise awareness of glacier conservation and adaptation solutions, fostering greater public and stakeholder engagement. Observance of global initiatives, such as the International Year of Glaciers’ Preservation 2025, amplifies advocacy efforts and strengthens international cooperation on mountain climate resilience. Integrating these approaches into research and policy frameworks supports long-term sustainability and adaptation in glacier-dependent regions.
Civil society
The Scientific Assessment of the Third Pole Environment has enhanced understanding of climate and environmental challenges in the Tibetan Plateau and Pamir-Hindu Kush, providing critical data for adaptation strategies. The Adaptation Gap Report 2023 has highlighted key challenges and solutions for mountain adaptation, showcasing successful approaches from Bhutan and Pakistan. These efforts have also raised awareness about the importance of glaciers and frozen environments in the global climate system. The Caucasus Environment Outlook 2.0 emphasizes the importance of regional environmental monitoring and contains a wealth of information, maps and tables on several aspects of climate change adaptation in the ecoregion. Contributions to the International Year of Glaciers' Preservation 2025 will further expand knowledge on mountain environments, informing global climate action and policies.
United Nations Environment Programme
Asia, EuropeGlobal, National
China, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Pakistan, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Türkiye, I.R. of Iran, Russian  Federation,Myanmar
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Practitioners17/04/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentBiodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Gender, Water resources
crmmocservices
As a science-based organization, UNEP has worked to address knowledge gaps and support assessment and outreach efforts to communicate key messages and inform policies on climate change impacts, adaptation, and loss & damage in mountain regions. Supporting evidence-based decision making has been at the core of the organization`s and partners` work over decades to improve the state of the environment. Recent publications include ‘A Scientific Assessment of the Third Pole Environment’ (Report), which presents the latest knowledge on climate, freshwater bodies, ecosystems, biodiversity, and human impact in the Tibetan Plateau and Pamir-Hindu Kush Mountain regions. The Adaptation Gap Report 2023 features three mountain-related case studies:  Mountains in Silent Thaw: The Disappearing Frozen Heartbeat of Our Earth, Closing Weather and Climate Data Gaps: Enabling Effective Adaptation in Bhutan, and Cascading Impacts and  Floods: Building Adaptive Capacity in Pakistan.  On a regional level, the second edition of the Caucasus Environment Outlook has been published and looking ahead, UNEP is preparing contributions to the International Year of Glaciers' Preservation 2025, further strengthening global efforts to protect mountain ecosystems.
2632NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2534322/04/2016 11:56NWP Partner profilePartner
Regional center/network/initiative
Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaGlobal, Regional
16/04/2025 14:54No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Capacity building, Climate observations, Education and training, Impact assessment, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Disaster risk reduction
Roberto Felix
The Mountain Research Initiative promotes global change research in mountains regions across borders and disciplines through connection and collaboration – with a view to supporting pathways towards sustainable mountain development.​
NWPSearchableItem
  
2947027/03/2025 10:00Case study
A key lesson from the Adaptation at Altitude Programme is the critical importance of knowledge management and the exchange of information. By fostering collaboration among stakeholders, the programme has created platforms for learning and sharing best practices, thus enhancing adaptive capacity in mountain communities. The programme has established the Adaptation at Altitude Knowledge Network and the Climate Change Adaptation in Mountains theme on weADAPT, which serve as community learning and networking spaces for stakeholders working on climate change adaptation in mountains. Additionally, the Adaptation at Altitude Solutions Portal provides access to proven adaptation solutions, showcasing successful case studies and offering insights into their application across different mountain regions. One of the most effective strategies has been the creation of science–policy platforms, which facilitate evidence-based decision-making. These platforms have allowed the programme to bridge the gap between scientific research and policy formulation, ensuring that adaptation strategies are not only informed by the best available data but are also integrated into broader climate policies at national and regional levels. By strengthening regional cooperation and increasing stakeholder engagement, the programme has enhanced the ability of mountain regions to address the challenges posed by climate change.
Civil society
The Adaptation at Altitude Programme has significantly contributed to improved knowledge sharing and regional cooperation across the East African, South Caucasus, Tropical Andes, and Hindu Kush Himalaya regions. Through its science–policy platforms and collaborative tools, the programme has ensured that adaptation strategies tailored to mountain ecosystems are effectively incorporated into national and regional policies, increasing resilience in these regions. By facilitating access to reliable climate data and fostering cooperation among stakeholders, the programme has strengthened the institutional frameworks needed for climate adaptation, enabling governments and local communities to implement effective climate change adaptation measures. The programme's success is also seen in its ability to connect stakeholders across regions, creating a global community of practice focused on adapting to climate change in mountain ecosystems.
Stockholm Environment Institute
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Health, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Adaptation finance, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Urban resilience, Tourism, Services
crmmocservices
The Adaptation at Altitude Programme, aims to increase the resilience and adaptive capacity of mountain communities and ecosystems to climate change. It does so by improving knowledge on appropriate climate change adaptation strategies in the mountains and transferring that knowledge through science–policy platforms to inform decision-making at national, regional, and global levels. Key activities include: 1. Data, Information & Monitoring – The programme strengthens GEO Mountains, a flagship activity of the Mountain Research Initiative (MRI), under the framework of the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO). 2. Regional Governance, Advocacy & Collaborative Action - Mountain climate change adaptation should be mainstreamed into regional planning, policy processes and regional collaborative action and advocacy as a result of strengthened science-policy dialogue, targeted resource mobilisation and interregional exchange and action learning. 3. Knowledge Generation & Sharing - Knowledge and climate change adaptation information and solutions in the mountains are fostered, exchanged, discussed, and easily accessible, and applications are promoted at the local, regional and global levels through the Adaptation at Altitude Solutions Portal and the Adaptation at Altitude Knowledge Network. 4. Advocacy & Policy Influencing – The programme aims to influence policy processes related to climate change (UNFCCC, Paris Agreement, Global Stocktake), disaster risk reduction (Sendai Framework for DRR), and the Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030). In its second phase (2024-2027), the programme continues to build on achievements from its first phase and aims to strengthen the exchange of climate change adaptation knowledge across mountain regions globally.
2631NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946927/03/2025 10:00Case study
Standardizing metadata significantly enhances data usability and exchange, ensuring consistency across platforms. Developing automated quality control tools improves the reliability of climate datasets, reducing errors and increasing confidence in research findings. Historical climate data, particularly snow records, provide valuable insights for water resource management and climate trend analyses. Such records help predict seasonal variations, aiding policymakers in resource allocation. By integrating standardized metadata, automation, and historical datasets, practitioners can make data-driven decisions. Ultimately, improved data practices strengthen climate resilience, fostering collaboration and long-term planning for environmental sustainability and efficient water management strategies in response to changing climatic conditions.
Civil society
A centralized online platform for CAMON was established to enhance cross-disciplinary collaboration and use of data by improving their accessibility (see link). The standardized, quality controlled datasets which are now available can support more robust climate trend analyses and help inform more effective policy formulation. Additionally, CAMON’s historical snow datasets provide vital insights for improved water resource management, for instance by informing water supply regulations during dry periods. Researchers and policymakers can thus make more data-driven decisions, enhancing sustainability efforts. Improved accessibility and accuracy of historical insights collectively strengthen climate resilience, ensuring efficient resource allocation and effective long-term environmental and water management strategies.
Mountain Research Initiative
AsiaRegional, Transboundary
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
References Shahgedanova, M., Saidaliyeva, Z., Mussina, A. Kapitsa, V., Raimbekova, Z., Donskikh, D., Kissebayev, D., Kasenov, M., Petrov, M. Debris flows in the northern Tien Shan, Central Asia: Regional database, meteorological triggers, and trends. NPJ Natural Hazards. (2024), 1: 49. 10.1038/s44304-024-00050-7. Saidaliyeva, Z., Shahgedanova, M., Yapiyev, V., Wade, A., Akbarov, F., Esenaman uulu, M., Kalashnikova, O., Kapitsa, V., Kasatkin, N., Rakhimov, I., Satylkanov, R., Sayakbaev, D., Semakova, E., Severskiy, I., Petrov, M., Umirzakov, G., Usubaliev, R. (2024) Precipitation in the mountains of Central Asia: isotopic composition and source regions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24 (21). pp. 12203-12224. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12203-2024. Wade, A., Yapiyev, V., Shahgedanova, M., Saidaliyeva, Z., Madibekov, A., Kapitsa, V., Kasatkin, N., Ismukhanova, L., Kulbekova, R., Sultanbekova, B., Severskiy, I., Esenaman, M., Kalashnikova, O., Usubaliev, R., Akbarov, F., Umirzakov, G., Petrov, M., Rakhimov, I., Kayumova, D., Kayumov, A. (2024) Cryosphere and land cover influence on stream water quality in Central Asia’s glacierized catchments. Science of the Total Environment, 939. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173525. Kapitsa, V., Shahgedanova, M., Kasatkin, N., Severskiy, I., Kasenov, M., Yegorov, A., Tatkova, M. (2023) Bathymetries of proglacial lakes: a new data set from the northern Tien Shan, Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1192719. Azisov, E., Hoelzle, M., Vorogushyn, S., Saks, T., Usubaliev, R., Esenaman uulu, M., Barandun, M. (2022) Reconstructed Centennial Mass Balance Change for Golubin Glacier, Northern Tien Shan. Atmosphere, 13, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060954. Shahgedanova, M., Afzal, M., Hagg, W., Kapitsa, V., Kasatkin, N., Mayr, E., Rybak, O., Saidaliyeva, Z., Severskiy, I., Usmanova, Z., Wade, A., Yaitskaya, N. and D. Zhumabayev (2020) Emptying Water Towers? Impacts of Future Climate and Glacier Change on River Discharge in the Northern Tien Shan, Central Asia. Water, 12, 627. doi:10.3390/w12030627. Kapitsa, V., Shahgedanova, M., Severskiy, I., Kasatkin, N., White, K. and Usmanova, Z. (2020) Assessment of changes in mass balance of the Tuyuksu group of glaciers, northern Tien Shan between 1958 and 2016 using ground-based observations and Pleiades satellite imagery. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8. 259. ISSN 2296-6463. doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00259. Shahgedanova, M., Afzal, M., Severskiy, I., Usmanova, Z., Saidaliyeva, Z., Kapitsa, V., Kazastkin, N. and Dolgikh, S. (2018) Changes in the mountain river discharge in the northern Tien Shan since the mid-20th Century: results from the analysis of a homogeneous daily streamflow data set from seven catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 564. 1133-1152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.001.
Capacity building, Climate observations, Education and training, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentDisaster risk reduction, Infrastructure, Services, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Central Asia Mountain Observatory Network (CAMON), which consists of five observatories in the mountainous regions of Central Asia, connects a community involved in monitoring efforts and collects historical and contemporary datasets covering Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) / Essential Mountain Climate Variables (EMCVs) to provide insights into climate change and its impact on mountain and downstream environments. The network was established through a funding contribution awarded by the Mountain Research Initiative (MRI) via its Global Network on Observations and Information in Mountain Environments (GEO Mountains). More specifically, the project addressed limitations related to the lack of metadata, standardization, and quality control in CAMON’s climate and snow datasets, which have historically limited their use for research, practice, and policymaking. By improving data management, the project has enhanced data exchange within and beyond the network. The improvements regarding CAMON’s snow data are particularly critical, since snowmelt is a major contributor to water resources and agricultural productivity in Central Asia.
2630NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946827/03/2025 10:00Case study
Building the capacities of local communities strengthens resilience to climate change impacts, ensuring locally driven and sustainable adaptation efforts. Establishing a network of adaptation practitioners facilitates knowledge exchange, fostering collaboration and the replication of successful strategies across mountain regions. Documenting effective climate adaptation solutions in East Africa and the South Caucasus enhances learning and informs future interventions. The Mountains ADAPT small grants scheme empowers communities by funding locally led adaptation initiatives. Selecting ten pilot interventions in 2024 using the innovative Kobo Tool ensures data-driven decision-making. Expanding the grants scheme in 2025 increases financial access for mountain communities, scaling up successful adaptation efforts and enhancing long-term climate resilience.
Civil society
The outcomes of the initiative have been significant in promoting climate resilience on the local level in benefitting mountain regions. Successful adaptation solutions have been documented in the Mountains ADAPT Solution booklets and an online portal, fostering knowledge sharing and encouraging uptake across mountain communities. These solutions have been disseminated at national, regional, and global events, inspiring adaptation action and facilitating scaling in vulnerable areas. The establishment of the Mountains ADAPT small grants scheme has provided vital financial support to community-based organizations carrying out local adaptation initiatives in implementation of (sub)national plans and policies. Additionally, the funding of nine pilot adaptation interventions in 2024, selected using the innovative Kobo Tool, has enabled targeted climate resilience efforts in mountain municipalities. Looking ahead, the planned expansion of the Mountains ADAPT grants scheme in 2025 will increase direct financial access for climate-affected mountain communities, further strengthening their adaptive capacity and long-term resilience.
United Nations Environment Programme
AfricaRegional
Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Financial support, Impact assessmentBiodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Gender, Tourism, Water resources
crmmocservices
Together with regional partners, UNEP has worked to identify and showcase adaptation solutions proven to be successful in response to climate change impacts that negatively affect mountain communities’ livelihoods and ecosystems in East Africa and the South Caucasus. The solutions have been published in two Mountains ADAPT Solution booklets, available here: Mountains ADAPT Solutions – East Africa and South Caucasus. The solutions have been accessed more than 2,000 times and disseminated at national, regional, and global events to inspire, facilitate, and promote the uptake, transferral, and upscaling of adaptation action in mountain regions. To further accelerate this much-needed action for mountain communities, UNEP has been working on establishing a Mountains ADAPT small grants funding mechanism for Community-Based Organizations in the benefitting regions. In 2024, nine pilot interventions have been funded in selected mountain municipalities together with national government representatives, using the Kobo Tool. Lessons from this pilot phase inform the rollout of the Mountains ADAPT scheme in 2025-28, awarding small grants to mountain communities most affected by climate change, building capacities, and supporting a network of adaptation practitioners.
2629NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946727/03/2025 10:00Case study
Several coping strategies within the affected communities. Many communities build different types of ice structures to ensure water supply. Nowadays it is more common to build ice stupas which are conical structures of water that freeze to ice. These are placed at different key locations to serve agricultural needs in time for sowing. These strategies show differences based on the regional differences. The case in Uttarakhand is relatively different than Ladakh as communities did not experience water scarcity. Instead they spoke of changes in grazing pastures for their sheep and goats. The importance of the sacred rivers, which glaciers feed, were also at the forefront. Coping strategies in this area are more about diversification of livelihoods. It is important to treat every region and community as a unique case study. While climate change is a global phenomenon, its effects will always be dealt with on the local level. That is why it is crucial to identify and highlight local knowledges and ways to address change
Civil society
Preliminary results show that: – Most research on glaciers has focused on the physiological effects of glacial melt by quantifying the scale of change. Our results identify what these changes actually mean for societies and ecosystem values. Different groups assign different values to glaciers across Scandinavia and the Himalaya. These values have important implications for how people deal with negative impacts on water, agriculture, hydroelectric energy, tourism and other types of livelihoods. Based on field trips and interviews, including recent field work in the mountain desert Ladakh and an agricultural region Uttarakhand in Indian Himalaya, we have identified several adverse effects from glacial melt. These include water scarcity, negative impacts on grazing and farming, as well as changes related to non-material aspects such as spiritual and recreational values.
Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University
Asia, Europe, Polar regionsGlobal, Transboundary
Norway, Sweden, India and Nepal
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
Science and researchAdaptation finance, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation
crmmocservices
This main purpose of NATURICE is to examine how values and human-nature relationships are affected by biodiversity loss and climate change through a study of glacierized environments in Scandinavia and the Himalaya. NATURICE seeks answers to the following questions: · In what ways does glacier retreat affect human-nature relations and plural values of nature across glacierized sub-regions in Scandinavia and the Himalaya? · How are the impacts of the glacier change distributed across social differences in relation to gender, socioeconomy, race, age and other dimensions? · What lessons can be drawn for implementing sustainable development goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda by linking effects of climate change on biodiversity and plural values of nature
2628NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946627/03/2025 10:00Case study
Identifying barriers and enabling factors for transformative climate adaptation helps tailor strategies to the unique challenges of mountain communities. Addressing these factors enhances the effectiveness of adaptation efforts, ensuring long-term resilience. Capacity-building initiatives empower local researchers to generate context-specific climate adaptation evidence, strengthening local expertise and ownership of adaptation solutions. Collaboration with early-career scientists and local communities fosters inclusive knowledge production and documentation of adaptation strategies, particularly in African mountain regions. Publishing research on climate change impacts, adaptation practices, and cultural influences enhances global understanding and informs policy development. Integrating these approaches into adaptation planning supports evidence-based, community-driven resilience-building in mountain ecosystems.
Civil society
The project focused on identifying barriers and enabling factors for transformative climate adaptation in African mountain regions. Capacity-building efforts were conducted to empower local researchers to generate local observations of climatic changes and impacts in the biophysical domain (which are of key importance in mountain regions with no historical meteorological records) and climate adaptation evidence. Collaborations with early-career scientists from African universities and local communities helped document climate adaptation strategies specific to these regions. Through monthly webinars with local research from eight African countries, knowledge exchange across study sites was enhanced, fostering South-South partnerships. Research findings were published, covering the impacts of climate change, adaptation practices, and the cultural influences on adaptation within mountain communities.
Mountain Research Initiative
AfricaLocal, National, Regional
Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Burundi, Rwanda,  Tanzania
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
lCuni-Sanchez, A., Aneseyee, A.B., Baderha, G.K.R. et al. ‘Perceived Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Responses in Ten African Mountain Regions’. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02221-w Baderha, G. et al. (2024) Comparative Study of Climate Change Adaptation Practices in Conflict-Affected Mountain Areas of Africa. Mountain Research and Development, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00014 Cuni-Sanchez, A., I. Twinomuhangi, A. Berta Aneseyee, B. Mwangi, L. Olaka, R. Bitariho, T. Soromessa, B. Castro, and N. Zafra-Calvo. (2022). Everyday adaptation practices by coffee farmers in three mountain regions in Africa. Ecology and Society 27(4):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13622-270432 Nkurunziza, A.; Intwarinkase Mutaganzwa, D.; Ndayitwayeko, W.M.; Nkengurutse, J.; Kaplin, B.A.; Teixidor Toneu, I.; Zafra-Calvo, N.; Cuni-Sanchez, A. Local Observations of Climate Change and Adaptation Responses: A Case Study in the Mountain Region of Burundi-Rwanda. Land (2023), 12, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020329 Mwangi, B., et al. (2022) The role of culture in climate change adaptation. Insights from two mountain regions in Kenya. Routledge Handbook of Climate Change Impacts on Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-edit/10.4324/9781003356837/routledge-handbook-climate-change-impacts-indigenous-peoples-local-communities-victoria-reyes-garc%C3%ADa?refId=bee51134-a4c2-4bda-b253-d310da781019&context=ubx Kaganzi, K. et al. (2021) Local Perceptions of Climate Change and Adaptation Responses from Two Mountain Regions in Tanzania. Land 2021, 10, 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10100999
Adaptation planning and practices, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Water resources
crmmocservices
Between 2020 and 2022, an MRI-funded synthesis workshop was held as part of a grant awarded to the project titled "Transformative Adaptation to Climate Change in African Mountains". The goal was to engage early-career scientists and local communities in synthesizing local knowledge on climate change impacts and adaptation strategies used in African mountain systems. Key activities included identifying barriers and enabling factors that impact transformative adaptation and building local research capacity for generating climate adaptation evidence. Through the project, information was collected from 1500 local farmers and insights were consolidated into local adaptation practices, integrating community knowledge into six research publications on topics such as perceived climate change impacts and adaptation responses in ten African mountains, adaptation responses across wealth groups, , the role of culture in adaptation, differences in adaptation practices in two conflict-affected mountain regions and everyday adaptation practices by coffee farmers in three African mountain regions. These findings contribute to the development of adaptation solutions and support global climate assessments, including those by the IPCC. A policy brief was produced summarizing findings for non-academic audiences, in English and French.
2627NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946527/03/2025 10:00Case study
SCALA has fostered strong collaboration with organizations and territorial leaders, the private sector, universities and government bodies, all of which highlight the importance of the participation and significant support of local farming communities and Indigenous Peoples as key agents of change. The development and promotion of spaces for the collaborative management of knowledge, learning and implementation, such as the climate action laboratories, the certificate in agriculture adapted to climate change, the adaptation dialogues and territorial observatories, have proven to be effective solutions for the identification and translation of priorities into concrete community-led actions appropriate to different local realities and needs. These tools have been key in strengthening capacities and collaborations with local actors, guaranteeing sufficient time and resources for their meaningful participation and contribution in the implementation and improvement of the NDCs and NAPs. The School of Ecological Restoration and the Climate Action Advocacy School have also contributed to the development of leadership skills, as strategies for the replicability and sustainability of the knowledge and capacities achieved at the territorial level. The use of relevant climate information at the territorial level, such as the 31 departmental risk and vulnerability analyses, provides essential tools and indicators for informed decision-making in the agriculture sectors. The development of tools for the use and promotion of this information, such as the certification of agriculture adapted to climate change, is key to promote and facilitate the adoption by small and medium-sized producers of transformative adaptation measures that generate added value through transparent and evidence-based local adaptation monitoring and evaluation systems. The strengthening of traditional and Indigenous knowledge, capacities and local resources is essential to these processes, moving from planning to the informed implementation of adaptation measures aligned with the socio-environmental and climatic realities specific to each context. These processes have contributed to the development of ecosystem-based and community-led adaptation strategies, which provide viable solutions for sustainable and local food production, food security and agrobiodiversity in the high mountain areas of Colombia.
Civil society
In the mountainous regions of Colombia, SCALA has taken specific measures to improve adaptation strategies. In collaboration with the National University and the University of the Andes, SCALA was instrumental in the creation of two Territorial Observatories, focused on the development of capacities and tools for the analysis of agrifood systems and territorial planning in the high mountain moorland areas of Chingaza and Sumapaz, two key buffer zones of the (Sumapaz?) National Park. These observatories facilitated gender-sensitive and participatory assessments of agrifood systems and their related climate risks. SCALA also completed a total of 32 risk and vulnerability assessments for each of Colombia’s departments, providing tools and indicators relevant to informed climate risk management in agricultural subsectors, with a special focus on mountainous regions. This was accompanied by the development of guidelines and training workshops to improve the capacity of local actors to use these tools and monitor climate risks, as well as the development and implementation of a certification in agriculture adapted to climate change to facilitate the monitoring, adoption and recognition of climate change adaptation measures by small and medium-sized producers. SCALA also supports the recovery and dissemination of 15 adaptation practices and techniques based on local traditional knowledge and agrobiodiversity through a series of territorial adaptation dialogues covering the five macro-regions of the country (Amazon, Andes, Pacific, Caribbean and Orinoco), which will be published in a guide in 2025. The programme contributed to the co-creation of four Climate Action Laboratories, together with farming communities in the high mountain moorland areas, promoting community-led planning and implementation of nature-based solutions that support agrobiodiversity, climate action and sustainable water management. These initiatives have strengthened local productive and organizational capacities, including the establishment of community nurseries, ecological restoration, the rescue of native species, and the automation of irrigation systems. In 2023, through the Alliance between SCALA and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) Small Grants Programme in the Sumapaz region, 15 Memoranda of Understanding were signed with territorial organizations for participatory planning and the implementation of concrete adaptation and restoration actions. These community-led efforts and the experiences and results of the Climate Action Laboratories were presented at COP16 in a documentary film. The close working relationship established with women leaders and other community actors laid the foundation for the development of the School of Ecological Restoration with the Javeriana University and the Climate Action Advocacy School with the National University to strengthen the capacities of community leaders in the adaptation of high mountain ecosystems.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
South AmericaNational
Colombia
Communities27/03/2025 10:00crmmocservices
FAO. 2025. Scaling up Climate Ambition on Land Use and Agriculture through Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans (SCALA). https://www.fao.org/in-action/scala/en UNDP. 2025. Scaling up Climate Ambition on Land Use and Agriculture through Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans (SCALA). https://www.adaptation-undp.org/scala FAO. 2024. Certificado en Agricultura adaptada al cambio climático. https://cambioclimatico.fao.org.co/certificado-en-aacc/ FAO. 2024. Análisis de Vulnerabilidad frente al Cambio Climático para el Sector Agropecuario en Colombia. https://cambioclimatico.fao.org.co/analisis-vulnerabilidad/ Peña-Torres, J.A. & Reina-Rozo, J.D. 2022. Agroecology and communal innovation: LabCampesino, a pedagogical experience from the rural youth in Sumapaz, Colombia. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 4: 100162.
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Education and training, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Food security, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The Scaling up Climate Ambition on Land Use and Agriculture through Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans (SCALA) Programme, led by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), supports 12 partner countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America to achieve transformative climate action in agrifood systems. Using countries' nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and national adapatation plans (NAPs) as starting points, SCALA identifies pathways to move from planning to the implementation of climate solutions. The SCALA approach is built on multistakeholder engagement and aligns with multiple other sustainable development objectives, such as strengthening food security and nutrition, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem restoration, and gender and social inclusion. The programme is oriented towards three main results: i) strengthening the evidence base for transformative action; ii) improving the governance, integration and monitoring of agricultural and land-use priorities; and iii) catalysing investment and private sector engagement for climate action. In Colombia, SCALA is contributing to the development of guidelines and capacities at the territorial level for the effective implementation of adaptation actions and the Integrated Climate Change Management Plan for the Agricultural Sector (PIGCCS-Agriculture), working with local communities and in priority agricultural chains such as coffee, rice, corn, meat, milk, sugar cane and cocoa.
2626NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946419/03/2025 13:30Case study
1. Inclusivity and Inter-generational Participation The coalition values contributions from all ages. It respects the Naxi tradition of respecting elders and involves young people. This inter-generational approach aids the inheritance of Naxi biocultural heritage. It also conducts cultural revival activities like teaching Dongba language, establishing seed banks and museums, and strengthening customs. These preserve Naxi cultural identity and promote equity. 2. Empowering Local Communities The coalition's establishment of China's first farmer-managed Community Seed Bank is significant. These banks empower villagers to protect agrobiodiversity and strengthen their cultural identity. The revival of local seeds promotes traditional farming. Practices like using bio - pesticides and intercropping reduce chemical use, benefit the environment, and boost income. 3. Inheriting Traditional Knowledge Naxi women play a key role in conservation farming. Through informal groups and cooperatives, they exchange climate strategies using traditional knowledge and customary law. Researching and publishing the "Stone Village Wild Plant Species Field Guide" and "Dongba Book Series" promotes Naxi culture and ecological conservation, sharing traditional knowledge. 4. Building Strong Partnerships Local farmers and scientists' cooperation has developed drought-resistant crops, enhancing crop diversity and access to genetic resources. The coalition's partnerships with FSN, UNEP-IEMP, and IIED enable international exchanges. This boosts its global influence and strengthens its leadership in sustainable agriculture and cultural heritage. 5. Adapting to Climate Change Conserving diverse seeds and innovative practices enhance the community's resilience to extreme weather. The seeds help crops adapt to climate change, reducing agricultural vulnerability. Reforestation and sustainable forest management on slopes improve water and soil management, reducing drought and landslide risks, showing the importance of ecosystem - based adaptation in mountains.
Civil society
Outcomes 1. Remarkable Community Conservation Achievements The coalition's community - based conservation efforts are remarkable. Through Participatory Plant Breeding, over 20 new crop varieties adapted to local conditions have been developed. This enriches agrobiodiversity and helps farmers face climate - related challenges, ensuring food security. Community seed banks have preserved over 100 local crop varieties. The revival of traditional knowledge is evident in the publication of the "Dongba Bio - Cultural Guardians" book series and a wild plant field guide, crucial for ethnic culture and ecological conservation. 2. Fruitful Cultural Inheritance and Promotion The "Dongba Bio-Cultural Guardians" book series effectively promotes ethnic culture and ecological conservation. It's a valuable resource for research, education, and sustainable development, helping people understand Naxi biocultural heritage and its ecological significance. The wild plant field guide facilitates the inheritance of traditional ecological knowledge. It records local wild plant details for plant conservation, natural resource use, and traditional medicine research. 3. Water Resource Management Optimization The coalition has restored and maintained traditional irrigation systems and customary laws. This improves water use efficiency, enabling rational water distribution for agriculture and domestic needs. It also prevents soil erosion. The traditional systems protect soil structure, maintaining the mountainous area's ecological balance and local ecosystem stability. 4. Outstanding Cooperation and Capacity - Building Achievements As a core INMIP member, the coalition actively engages in international exchanges. This broadens its perspective, enhances global influence, and provides opportunities to learn from other regions. Cooperation with scientists boosts local communities' technical capabilities and promotes the recognition and use of Naxi traditional wisdom. Each village's unique contributions drive innovation in conservation and development.
International Institute for Environment and Development
AsiaLocal
SW China
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners19/03/2025 13:30crmmocservices
Indigenous Naxi-Moso cultural values and worldviews for sustainable development: Four Village Biocultural Heritage Coalition, Yunnan, China | IIED Publications Library Landscape approaches for mountain community sustainable development in a time of climate change: Policy Consultation and South-South Exchange Workshop and INMIP Mountain Community Exchange Walking Workshop | IIED Publications Library Stone Village Declaration (May 2016) | IIED Publications Library Biocultural Adaptation in Mountain Communities: Third INMIP International Learning Exchange, Stone Village, China | IIED Publications Library Montréal Declaration on Small-Scale Women Farmers for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use | IIED Publications Library EbA The unsung heroes for nature and climate Working with nature to build back better from COVID-19: inspirations from farmers in China
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Health, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
Four Village biocultural heritage coalition, Yunnan China: In the mountains of SW China, four Naxi and Moso indigenous villages have established a coalition of biocultural territories to revitalise agrobiodiversity, protect water resources and mountain ecosystems for climate resilience. During a recent recurring spring drought spanning 10 years, they were able to continue to produce food thanks to conservation of resilient landraces and indigenous crops and maintenance of customary water management systems. They have revived crop diversity and traditional knowledge through participatory plant breeding and community seed banks and registers. This initiative has been inspired by the Potato Park in Peru, following an INMIP learning exchange. The 4-village coalition enables horizontal learning between the communities on seed conservation and improvement and revival of traditional knowledge and Dongba culture that underpin ecosystem conservation and climate resilience. See: Case study: https://www.iied.org/20376g INMIP exchange in Stone Village & customary water management: https://www.iied.org/14669iied
2623NWPSearchableItemtianmilin@fsnchina.netTechnical document/report
  
2946313/03/2025 15:00Case study
A key strength of the MPP Initiative is its emphasis on participatory approaches and community engagement, which help foster a sense of ownership and empowerment among local producers. This promotes long-term sustainability as communities actively participate in the decision-making and production processes. The narrative labels have proven to be an effective tool in increasing consumer interest and appreciation for mountain products, enhancing their recognition as mountain products in the market. The initiative also combines technical and financial assistance, ensuring that producers can transition to sustainable practices without financial hardship The integration of traditional knowledge, biodiversity conservation, and economic development has created an enabling environment where the sustainability of both the environment and the local economy is prioritized.
Civil society
The MPP Initiative has helped small-scale mountain producers secure higher earnings, having increased the price of mountain products. This enhances mountain producers’ livelihoods and fosters economic resilience in remote, mountainous regions. It has also contributed to the preservation of traditional agricultural methods and the conservation of biodiversity. Through the participatory guarantee systems, the initiative has built consumer trust in mountain products, increasing their market competitiveness. The combination of capacity-building, certification systems and market access has empowered small-scale producers to achieve sustainable economic growth while preserving their cultural heritage and the environmental integrity of mountain regions. The initiative has showcased that small-scale mountain producers can thrive in the global market by focusing on sustainability, tradition, and biodiversity conservation, providing a model for other mountain regions to follow.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaRegional
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), India, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Nepal, Panama, Peru, Philippines
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers13/03/2025 15:00crmmocservices
Giorgio.Grussu@fao.org
Adaptation planning and practices, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The Mountain Partnership Products (MPP) Initiative promotes sustainable agrifood systems and value chains in mountain areas, specifically targeting small-scale producers from emerging economy countries. Its activities include the development of mountain participatory guarantee systems, that certify the organic production and sustainability of mountain products, offering small-scale mountain producers a competitive advantage by adding value to their products. The initiative has also created narrative labels for mountain products, which highlight the origin, traditional production methods, and cultural significance, increasing consumer awareness and appreciation. Additionally, the initiative provides technical and financial support to mountain producers, helping them transition to more sustainable farming practices and improve the quality of their products. The initiative facilitates market linkages to connect local producers with local, regional and international markets, enhancing the visibility and demand for mountain products globally. This support system enables small-scale mountain producers to adopt more sustainable practices without economic strain while creating a viable, sustainable value chain that benefits both producers and consumers, while maintaining ecological balance in fragile mountain ecosystems.
2622NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2946213/03/2025 15:00Case study
The EPiCC Pyrenees project underlines the importance of transboundary cooperation and adaptation to climate change, The EPiCC Pyrenees project emphasizes the importance of cross-border cooperation and shared strategies in addressing climate change in mountainous regions. The cooperation being the key to accelerating climate action. One good practice has been the development of a unified climate action strategy that is customized for the specific challenges and vulnerabilities of the Pyrenees region. Stakeholder involvement has been crucial, ensuring that local communities, governments, and researchers collaborate in decision-making and the implementation of adaptation measures. Another lesson learned is the value of integrating both scientific data and local ecological knowledge to design effective and culturally sensitive adaptation projects. This has led to better buy-in from local communities and enhanced implementation success. Furthermore, the emphasis on disaster risk reduction through early-warning systems and community preparedness has been an important aspect of the strategy’s success.
Civil society
As a result of the EPiCC Pyrenees Climate Change Strategy, an operational plan has been elaborated, aiming at implementing strategic guidelines in the Pyrenean territory through 72 concrete actions by 2030. Developed collaboratively, it follows a cross-border approach to tackle climate challenges holistically, with a budget of 80 Million Euros. The adoption of a cross-border strategy has strengthened the policy frameworks in France, Spain, and Andorra, resulting in coordinated actions on climate adaptation and risk management across these countries. Local communities have benefited from enhanced capacity-building programs, allowing them to better respond to climate impacts. Moreover, the implementation of adaptation projects has increased awareness of climate change impacts, particularly within the context of water resources, agriculture, and biodiversity conservation, among others. Stronger collaboration among European mountain regions has fostered international partnerships that are crucial for scaling climate adaptation efforts in other mountainous areas.
Pyrenees Climate Change Observatory- Pyrenees Working Community
EuropeRegional, Transboundary
France, Spain, Andorra
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers13/03/2025 15:00crmmocservices
https://www.opcc-ctp.org/enhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKd1aLd5yqM https://www.opcc-ctp.org/en/documentos?field_doc_tags_tid=&field_doc_idioma_tid_i18n%5B%5D=18 chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.opcc-ctp.org/sites/default/files/documentacion/catalog_partners_p4c.pdf chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.opcc-ctp.org/sites/default/files/documentacion/estrategia_en_digital_0.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Tourism
crmmocservices
The EPiCC Pyrenees Climate Change Strategy is the first European climate change strategy for a mountain and cross-border bioregion with a systemic and integrated vision. It encompasses seven territories across three different countries: the Principality of Andorra, the Spanish autonomous communities of Aragon, Catalonia, the Basque Country, and Navarre, and the French regions of Nouvelle-Aquitaine and Occitanie. The main objective of the EPiCC strategy is to propose actions that address both adaptation and, synergistically with it, mitigation, aimed at radically enhancing the resilience of the Spanish-French Andorran Pyrenees region to climate change. This 2050 strategy incorporates key elements such as climate impact assessment and vulnerability analysis, together with the integration of local knowledge and an operational plan to 2030. Its implementation includes the implementation of a series of climate adaptation projects targeting local and regional communities, focusing on capacity building, enhancing disaster risk reduction efforts and promoting sustainable resource management. In parallel, there is ongoing engagement with stakeholders and local communities to ensure that adaptation measures are contextually appropriate and beneficial. These efforts are embodied in more than 30 case studies that will form the basis for the transfer and replication of climate action.
2621NWPSearchableItemanna_boneta@govern.adTechnical document/report
  
2946113/03/2025 14:30Case study
The Potato Park is an emblematic biocultural heritage territory – it pioneered a decolonial approach to supporting community landscape management and conservation that uses Indigenous philosophies of wellbeing, rather than western conservation goals, which results in ecosystem, agrobiodiversity and wildlife conservation as outcomes. The Potato Park is rooted in a community-led decolonizing action-research approach, which privileges indigenous knowledge, methods and tools, and links these with participatory approaches. This approach has reversed the loss of traditional knowledge and values for conservation and climate adaptation, and has led to multiple impacts as explained above. It has also ensured strong community ownership and self-sustainability. The Potato Park’s inter-community agreement for benefit-sharing has ensured that economic benefits are shared amongst communities and with the very poor, and avoided elite capture and conflicts. It has also helped to maintain collective values that underpin sharing of seeds and and resources, and reciprocity, and solidarity values that ensure the most vulnerable are supported in times of climatic extremes or other shocks. The Potato Park’s rich genetic reserve and community seed bank provides an important source of native potato varieties that are adapted to diverse and extreme conditions – eg. drought, frost, pests, and that are highly nutritious. The Potato Park provides an effective model for in situ conservation of agrobiodiversity in centres of origin and diversity. The Potato park model should be scaled-out to other Indigenous and local communities to protect evolving and co-evolving genetic resources which are rapidly being lost, and to establish a global network of biocultural territories. Scaling-out means adapting the model to different contexts, and is best done through community-to-community learning exchanges. More funding is needed to support Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their organisations to establish biocultural heritage territories for climate adaptation. More supportive policies are also needed to protect traditional knowledge and biocultural heritage and related rights.
Civil society
The Potato Park has tripled native potato diversity and reversed the loss of native potatoes. It has also revitalized traditional knowledge, establishing a thriving traditional knowledge system for ecological stewardship and adaptive landscape management. It has strengthened Andean philosophies of Buen Vivir or holistic wellbeing, where wellbeing requires balance between the humans, the wild and the sacred communities (mountain gods), and strengthened Andean values of Balance, Reciprocity and Solidarity – with nature and in society. The Potato Park has also strengthened cultural identity and the capacity of community to protect their land rights and precolonial territorialities. This rich interlinked biological and cultural heritage has resulted in improved food and nutrition security despite severe climate change impacts in the high Andes. The Potato Park has built strong collective local institutions, enabling it to influence regional laws to prevent biopiracy and ban GMOs. It has also built strong capacity for addressing climate change impacts, linking traditional knowledge and western science. The park has established an alternative biocultural economy which generates income while maintaining cultural and spiritual values and ensures benefits are shared equitably amongst communities and with the most vulnerable. It conserves vital water resources for mountain and downstream populations. By maintaining and strengthening traditional knowledge and values the Park also contributes to climate change mitigation eg. by maintaining native pastures as carbon sinks and low carbon, low-consumption economies.
International Institute for Environment and Development
South AmericaLocal
Peru
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers13/03/2025 14:30crmmocservices
Biocultural heritage territories: key to halting biodiversity loss | IIED Publications Library Indigenous Seed Systems and Biocultural Heritage: The Andean Potato Park's Approach to Seed Governance | IIED Publications Library Resilient Biocultural Heritage Landscapes for Sustainable Mountain Development | IIED Publications Library Resilient Farming Systems in Times of Uncertainty: Biocultural Innovations in the Potato Park, Peru | IIED Publications Library
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The Potato Park biocultural heritage territory is an effective response to climate change that has enhanced the resilience of mountain communities and ecosystems in the high andes of Southern Peru. Located in the Cusco region, the Potato Park is a landscape of c. 9,200 ha which is collectively governed by 5 Quechua communities. It conserves c. 1400 different native varieties of potato (about 650 varieties based on western classification), 3-4 potato wild relatives and rich Andean agrobiodiversity and ecosystems, based on traditional knowledge and cultural and spiritual values. The Potato Park’s landscape-based genetic reserve provides an evolving and co-evolving gene bank for climate adaptation locally and globally, today and in the future. Quechua farmers select resilient potato varieties and use wild potato relatives to enhance the resilience of cultivated potatoes through cross-breeding. They are also monitoring the impacts of climate change on the altitudinal range of potatoes. Soil warming has increased the lower planting line for potatoes by 200m in the last 30 years due to increased pests, and some potato varieties and related TK have reached the top of the mountain where there is no more land and have been lost. However, the Potato Park has significantly increased crop diversity through a potato repatriation agreement with the International Potato Centre, which has improved food and nutrition security and climate resilience. Biocultural microenterprises have doubled incomes and established a communal fund, increasing resilience to shocks and adaptive capacity. The Potato Park has also enabled Quechua communities to protect their land rights against mining and to influence regional government policies. See: Briefing paper on traditional mountain landscapes: https://www.iied.org/21241iied https://www.andes.org.pe/potatopark-pisac/
2620NWPSearchableItemkrystyna.swiderska@iied.orgTechnical document/report
  
2946013/03/2025 14:30NWP Action pledge
Civil society
Protect Your Environment Foundation
National
Cameroon
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector13/03/2025 14:30crmmocservices
Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Impact assessment, Monitoring and evaluation/M&EEcosystems, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Energy
crmmocservices
2617NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2945910/03/2025 12:00Case study
Enhancing data availability and accessibility for very-high-resolution remote sensing in mountain ecosystems strengthens ecological monitoring and decision-making. Addressing data gaps through coordinated efforts improves the accuracy of vegetation assessments. Advancing image classification techniques that can leverage the high information content of very-high-resolution imagery enables more precise land-cover mapping of diverse mountain vegetation types, supporting improved ecosystem analyses and conservation strategies. Furthermore, building a collaborative research network fosters knowledge exchange, particularly by engaging early-career researchers and focusing on technical elements (e.g. processing algorithms), helps ensure long-term scientific progress of this growing field. Global conferences serve as key platforms for disseminating findings, advancing mountain vegetation monitoring, and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and learning. Sharing and integrating these approaches both in research and practice can also help enhance policy frameworks in the application of remote sensing for sustainable mountain ecosystem management.
Civil society
Contributions to joint projects and manuscripts to document the key scientific advances made. Furthermore, the project also contributed to policy and global assessments, including those by the IPCC in its sixth assessment.
Mountain Research Initiative
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal
Global
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Practitioners10/03/2025 12:00crmmocservices
https://alpine-treelines.de/literature.html
Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentEcosystems, Biodiversity
crmmocservices
An MRI-funded synthesis workshop, entitled Mapping Mountain Vegetation from Above Using Very-High-Resolution Remote Sensing: Challenges in Global Data Access and Image Classification, was held between 17-23 July 2022 to address two major challenges in the use of Earth Observations (EO) for monitoring and understanding mountain ecosystems: the availability of and access to very high resolution (< 1 m) EO data, and the development of associated image analysis techniques to detect and delineate diverse vegetation types under global change conditions. Particular emphasis was placed on the delineation of mountain treelines, which typically provide an expression of climate, act as a boundary between different ecological zones, and have implications for natural hazards and tourism. Access to very high resolution EO data is crucial to identify the sharp contrasts in vegetation types at treelines. This funded workshop led to the creation of a scientific community of practice (Alpine Treelines Online network: https://alpine-treelines.de/), including early-career researchers, focused on developing methodologies to enhance the use and adoption of EO for monitoring vegetation changes in mountain ecosystems. Findings were presented at major conferences, including the 2022 International Mountain Conference and the 2024 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU), where a session on Treeline Ecotones Under Global Change: Linking Spatial Patterns to Ecological Processes showcased a number of very-high-resolution remote sensing applications.
2624NWPSearchableItemcarolina.adler@unibe.chTechnical document/report
  
2945810/03/2025 11:30Case study
The successful implementation of the Five-Year Action Plan for the Development of Mountain Regions has provided valuable insights into effective strategies for sustainable mountain development. The experience has highlighted a set of good practices and key lessons that can serve as a model for other regions facing similar challenges. One of the most important good practices has been the integration of traditional knowledge with modern scientific approaches. Mountain communities have long possessed valuable knowledge about local ecosystems, weather patterns, and sustainable resource management. By combining this indigenous knowledge with contemporary scientific research, the plan has developed effective and context-specific solutions that respect both environmental and cultural heritage. For example, sustainable pasture management practices that blend traditional rotational grazing methods with modern monitoring technologies have helped maintain soil fertility and prevent overgrazing. Another key practice has been the emphasis on participatory decision-making and community engagement. The involvement of local populations in planning and implementation has ensured that development initiatives are tailored to their needs and priorities. Experience has shown that projects designed in collaboration with communities have a higher success rate and long-term sustainability. Moreover, participatory governance has strengthened local institutions, enhancing their capacity to manage resources effectively. The plan has also demonstrated the importance of multi-stakeholder partnerships. Collaboration between government agencies, local communities, international organizations, and private sector actors has created synergies that maximize impact. These partnerships have facilitated knowledge exchange, financial support, and technical expertise, leading to more comprehensive and effective interventions. Public-private partnerships, in particular, have played a crucial role in promoting investment in sustainable industries such as eco-tourism and organic farming. Sustainable financing has emerged as a crucial lesson from the implementation process. The experience has highlighted the importance of blended finance approaches, combining public funds, private sector investment, and international grants. Additionally climate adaptation funds have proven to be effective in ensuring continuous financial support for conservation and resilience-building efforts. One of the critical lessons learned is the necessity of an adaptive and flexible implementation strategy. Mountain regions are highly vulnerable to climate change and other external shocks, making it essential to design policies that can be adjusted in response to new challenges. The establishment of strong monitoring and evaluation systems has allowed for real-time assessment and timely adjustments to initiatives, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness. Capacity building and knowledge sharing have also emerged as fundamental components of success. Training programs for local farmers, entrepreneurs, and government officials have strengthened human capital and improved the implementation of sustainable practices. Exchange programs and study visits between different mountain regions have facilitated the transfer of best practices, enhancing cross-border collaboration on common challenges. The plan has also underscored the importance of integrating mountain issues into broader national and international policy frameworks. By aligning with global agendas such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the initiative has gained greater recognition and support. Kyrgyzstan’s advocacy for mountain-specific policies at international forums has been instrumental in drawing attention to the unique challenges faced by these regions and securing global cooperation. Lastly, a major lesson has been the need for long-term commitment and political will. Sustainable mountain development is a complex and ongoing process that requires consistent investment, policy support, and stakeholder engagement. The experience of implementing the Five-Year Action Plan has shown that sustained efforts over multiple years are necessary to achieve lasting impact.
National/public entity
The Five-Year Action Plan for the Development of Mountain Regions has led to significant and measurable outcomes that have strengthened the resilience of mountain ecosystems and communities. Through a comprehensive and strategic approach, the plan has addressed environmental, economic, and social challenges, resulting in a more sustainable future for mountain regions. One of the most notable achievements has been the enhancement of ecological resilience. Targeted interventions, such as reforestation programs, watershed management initiatives, and climate adaptation strategies, have helped mitigate the adverse effects of climate change. By implementing conservation projects, the plan has contributed to preserving biodiversity and preventing further degradation of fragile mountain ecosystems. Sustainable land use practices have also been promoted, ensuring that agricultural activities do not contribute to soil erosion or loss of biodiversity. The plan has also fostered economic growth in mountain regions by supporting sustainable livelihoods. Investments in organic agriculture, eco-tourism, and local entrepreneurship have created new income-generating opportunities, reducing rural poverty and enhancing food security. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in mountain communities have benefited from improved access to financial resources, training, and markets. The promotion of high-value products, such as medicinal plants, organic food, and traditional handicrafts, has not only increased local incomes but has also helped preserve cultural heritage. Infrastructure improvements have been another key outcome of the plan. Enhanced access to education, healthcare, and transportation has contributed to better living standards for mountain populations. The development of green energy solutions, such as micro-hydropower and solar energy, has provided sustainable and affordable electricity to remote areas, reducing dependence on fossil fuels and increasing energy security. Social development has also been a major area of progress. By prioritizing community engagement and participatory governance, the plan has strengthened local decision-making processes. Educational initiatives focused on environmental awareness and sustainable practices have ensured that future generations understand the importance of protecting their natural surroundings. Another significant outcome has been the improved integration of mountain issues into national and international policy frameworks. The plan has reinforced the importance of addressing mountain-specific challenges within the broader context of sustainable development, leading to increased recognition at the global level. Through active participation in international forums and policy discussions, Kyrgyzstan and other participating countries have successfully advocated for greater investment and cooperation in mountain development. Furthermore, the implementation of robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms has allowed for data-driven decision-making. By continuously assessing the effectiveness of various initiatives, policymakers have been able to adjust strategies to better meet the needs of mountain communities. This adaptive approach has ensured that the plan remains relevant and responsive to changing environmental and socio-economic conditions.
Government of Kyrgyzstan
AsiaNational
Kyrgyzstan
Academics and scientists, Policy makers10/03/2025 11:30crmmocservices
https://www.undp.org/kyrgyzstan/press-releases/roadmap-5-years-action-development-mountain-regions-2023-2027-was-discussed-stakeholders https://core.unesco.org/en/project/3240113333 https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/advancing-sustainable-mountain-development-and-protecting-water-towers-world https://24.kg/english/275624_President_announces_five-year_action_plan_for_development_of_mountain_regions/ https://24.kg/english/280947__Cabinet_Chairman_approves_roadmap_for_development_of_mountain_regions/
Capacity building, Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Vulnerability assessmentFood security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Health, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Tourism, Services
crmmocservices
The Five-Year Action Plan for the Development of Mountain Regions, is a strategic initiative designed to promote sustainable development across mountainous areas globally. This plan aims to enhance the resilience of mountain ecosystems and communities, support sustainable economic growth, reduce poverty, and foster biodiversity conservation. It aligns with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and includes mechanisms for resource mobilization, collaborative frameworks involving various stakeholders, and robust monitoring and evaluation to adapt to changing conditions. This comprehensive approach underlines the commitment of countries like Kyrgyzstan to integrate mountain issues into international policy discussions, ensuring that these critical regions receive the attention and support necessary to address their unique challenges in the face of climate change.
2625NWPSearchableItemuran.akhmetov@pdc.kgTechnical document/report
www.gov.kg
  
2945730/01/2025 11:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists30/01/2025 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2619NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2945630/01/2025 11:00Case study
Civil society
AfricaGlobal
Academics and scientists30/01/2025 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practicesAgriculture
crmmocservices
2618NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2945503/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South AmericaGlobal, National
Academics and scientists, Policy makers03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and researchAgriculture, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure, Services
crmmocservices
Climate solution articles published by AspenCore. This is the largest publishing company in the electronics industry. List of articles: https://www.manhattan2.org/#articles
2610NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Technical document/reportAll
https://www.manhattan2.org/#articles;#Climate Solution Articles (AspenCore)
  
2945403/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Asia, Europe, North AmericaGlobal, Local, National
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Technology supportAgriculture, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure, Services
crmmocservices
Free book on how to tackle climate change. Link to book: https://www.aplantosavetheplanet.org/book
2609NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Technical document/reportAll
https://www.aplantosavetheplanet.org/book;#A Plan to Save the Planet (free book)
  
2945303/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Asia, Europe, North AmericaGlobal, National
Academics and scientists, Policy makers03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Technology supportAgriculture, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure, Services
crmmocservices
Climate solution articles published by AspenCore. This is the largest publishing company in the electronics industry. List of articles: https://www.manhattan2.org/#articles
2608NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Technical document/reportAll
https://www.manhattan2.org/#articles;#Climate Solution Articles (AspenCore)
  
2945203/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National, Regional
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Practitioners03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Technology supportAgriculture, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure, Services
crmmocservices
This website contains information on how to tackle the climate problem at the lowest cost to society (https://www.manhattan2.org/).
2607NWPSearchableItemOnline portalALL
  
2945103/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Asia, Europe, North AmericaGlobal, National
Academics and scientists, Policy makers03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Technology supportAgriculture, Energy, Health, Heavy industry, Infrastructure
crmmocservices
This document describes how to set up an R&D laboratory that is tasked with saving the planet from climate change. This laboratory does not exist, yet it could be set up. If a nation wanted to do this, they could begin with this document, edit to their satisfaction, and then hand it to their engineers. This document is open-source, which means it can be used in any way for free. Link to document: https://www.ma2life.org/g/Decarbonization_Lab_Biz_Plan.pdf
2606NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/reportALL
  
2945003/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Asia, Europe, North America, South AmericaGlobal
Academics and scientists, Policy makers03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Knowledge management, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Technology supportAgriculture, Heavy industry, Infrastructure
crmmocservices
This document describes how to build a website that generates a climate plan, given user input. This website does not exist, yet it could be developed. If a nation wanted to develop policy making tools, they could begin with this document, edit to their satisfaction, and then hand it to their engineers. This document is open-source, which means it can be used in any way for free. Link to document: https://www.ma2life.org/g/Planet_Dashboard_Proposal.pdf
2605NWPSearchableItemPolicy brief;#Technical document/reportALL
  
2944903/12/2024 11:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector03/12/2024 11:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Technology supportAgriculture, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure
crmmocservices
Free YouTube videos that explain how to tackle the climate problem at the lowest cost. List of Videos: https://www.aplantosavetheplanet.org/climate-solution-videos
2604NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Multimedia material;#Policy briefALL
  
2944803/12/2024 10:30Knowledge Resource
Civil society
The Manhattan 2 Project
Asia, Europe, North America, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National
Academics and scientists, Policy makers, Private sector03/12/2024 10:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Knowledge management, Science and research, Technology supportAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Energy, Heavy industry, Infrastructure
crmmocservices
We asked AI to identify how to solve the entire climate problem at the lowest cost to society. Below is the result: https://www.aplantosavetheplanet.org/ai
2603NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Policy brief;#Technical document/reportALL
  
2944702/12/2024 14:30Case study
Researching and implementing innovative technologies to improve resilience to climate change and natural disasters, watershed restoration securing a reliable flow of water and energy for hydropower, planting trees for drought, restoration of mangrove forests to protect coastal communities from floods while rehabilitating fishes habitats.
Private sector, Research institution
Governance Pathways Revisiting Biodiversity is necessary for climate resilience and people's welfare!
Economic Cooperation Limited (to be re-submitted yet) through Governance Pathways Revisiting Biodiversity
Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Pacific/OceaniaGlobal, Local, National, Regional, Transboundary
Globally
Academics and scientists, Communities, Practitioners, Private sector02/12/2024 14:30crmmocservices
1. Massive Open On-line Courses on Leadership for Global Responsibility; Understanding Resilience Thinking; Applying Resilience Thinking to National Biodiversity Plans; National Adaptation Plans; Building Climate Resilience in Agriculture; Biodiversity Finance and lists of potential key actors and actions to enhance progress towards the implementation of the strategic plan for biodiversity sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people!
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Education and training, Financial support, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Technology support, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Health, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Adaptation finance, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Urban resilience, Tourism, Services
crmmocservices
Adverse climatic change, air-water-soil pollution, land and marine resources degration and loss of biodiversity are still, as they say, nearing critical levels in many parts of the World. Thus, more proactive, focused, and goal oriented approaches to social, economic, and environmental action should be used to mainstream conservation and the sustainable use of biodiversity into all sectoral policies, plans, programs, strategies and practices to ensure the sustained provisions of nature-based solutions to people. The vision is that: by year 2050 biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people.
2602NWPSearchableItemeuberclicayan7@gmail.comTechnical document/report
On construction yet
  
2944602/12/2024 13:00Case study
The three Naxi communities, renowned for their rich cultural heritage, particularly in water management, are actively revitalizing their indigenous practices, traditions, Dongba language, and religion with support from FSN and UNEP-IEMP. This initiative involves: 1. Teaching the Dongba Language and Symbols: Preserving and transmitting the ancient Naxi script. 2. Establishing Community Seed Banks and Culture Museums: Promoting seed conservation and cultural heritage. 3. Reinforcing Traditional Customs: Upholding age-old practices like elder-led governance and environmental stewardship. The Coalition prioritizes inclusivity, valuing contributions from all community members, regardless of age. The Naxi tradition of respecting elders is evident in active senior associations that share wisdom, while the Coalition also engages young people, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initiatives like Youmi Village's Youth Women's Group, which has revived weaving crafts, exemplify opportunities for youth empowerment. This holistic approach ensures the preservation and transmission of Naxi biocultural heritage, promoting equity and social inclusion across generations. Key lessons learned include: •Empowering Local Communities: (a) The Coalition has established the first farmer- managed Community Seed Bank (CSB) in China, playing a crucial role in preserving agrobiodiversity by safeguarding a diverse range of local crops and seeds. These CSBs have empowered villagers to take collective action and strengthen their cultural identity. (b) The first CSB, established in Stone village in 2016 with support from FSN, houses over 113 varieties, as detailed in the community seed registry. These encompass 20 maize PPB varieties, 14 varieties exchanged from FSN communities, 22 soybean PVS varieties, 43 local varieties, 12 local vegetable varieties, and 2 types of local cash crop and herbal medicine. Now, with four community seed banks established, a total of 207 farmer varieties are being preserved. (c) The revival of local seeds has promoted traditional diversified farming practices, which reduce pesticides use by using bio-pesticides derived from wild herbs and chilies, promote intercropping to reduce fertilizers use, both benefit the soil microbiome and wildlife, introduce reforestation around terrace field for soil conservation, and boost income through non-timber forest products like nuts. Moreover, these agroecological practices have enhanced water resource management by minimizing water use and pollution. •Preserving Traditional Knowledge: Naxi women leaders have fostered the establishment of informal groups promoting conservation farming. They have also formed two farmers' cooperatives to enhance market access and finance. These groups facilitate the exchange of climate action strategies, drawing on revived traditional knowledge and customary law to foster a sense of collective responsibility for shared resources. Additionally, the joint efforts to research and publish the "Stone Village Wild Plant Species Field Guide" and the "Dongba Book Series" have significantly contributed to the promotion of Naxi culture and ecological conservation. •Building Strong Partnerships: (a) Local farmers and scientists conducted trials on maize, legumes, peanuts, and vegetables, developing four drought-resistant maize varieties. These PPB and PVS efforts enhanced crop diversity in communities along the Jinsha River valley, improving access to valuable genetic resources. (b) The Naxi Mountain Villages Coalition, in partnership with FSN, UNEP-IEMP, and CAS, has played a crucial role in community-led conservation. By engaging in international exchanges and global forums, the Coalition has elevated its voice on the global stage and strengthened its position as a leader in sustainable agriculture and cultural heritage preservation. •Adapting to Climate Change: By continuously conserving diverse seeds and incorporating innovative practices, the community has enhanced its resilience to extreme weather events. Additionally, reforestation and sustainable forest management on surrounding mountain slopes have improved water and soil management, mitigating the risks of drought and landslide. Collectively, these endeavors exemplify a community-led governance model rooted in equitable water management. By leveraging global networks and scientific collaboration, local initiatives have been empowered, enriching global policy discussions and strengthening the voices of mountain Indigenous Peoples. This approach fosters resilience and self-determination by protecting cultural identity, territorial rights, and biodiversity.
Non-governmental organization - NGO
Key Achievements: 1. Community-Based Conservation: The Coalition has successfully implemented community-based conservation initiatives, including: • Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB): Developing over 20 new crop varieties adapted to local conditions. • Community Seed Banks: Preserving over 100 local crop varieties. • Traditional Knowledge Revival: Documenting and revitalizing indigenous knowledge systems. 2. Documentation and Publication of a Bio-cultural Book Series: • Between 2016 and 2022, the FSN team conducted a six-year community-based participatory social and anthropological study in collaboration with villagers. Employing methods such as oral history, semi-structured interviews, and participatory observation, a systematic documentation was undertaken. This research culminated in the publication of a three-book series titled "Dongba Bio-Cultural Guardians" by CITIC Press, one of China's leading publishing houses. The series includes Oral History of the 11 Dongba Masters in Youmi Village, Biocultural Record of Youmi Village, and Photography Booklet of 4 Moso/Naxi Villages in the Jingsha River Valley. This book series has significantly contributed to the promotion of ethnic culture and ecological conservation. • Publication of a Field Handbook of Indigenous wild plants in Stone Village: Our intern, in collaboration with the village head, Mr. Mu Wenchuan, developed a field guide documenting over 50 wild plant species used by the Naxi people of Stone Village, Yunnan. This guide includes each plant’s local Naxi name, Chinese name, Latin scientific name, along with traditional knowledge and uses. 3. Water Resource Management: • Traditional Water Management Systems: The Coalition has restored and maintained traditional irrigation systems and customary laws, to improve water efficiency and prevent soil erosion. 4. Building Partnerships and Capacity: • International Collaboration: The Coalition is a core member of the International Network of Mountain Indigenous Peoples (INMIP), which unites mountain IPLCs in 13 countries. Coalition members attended INMIP Walking Workshops (WW) in Bhutan, Peru and Tajikistan and joined farmer-scientist-policymaker dialogues. Following the WW in Peru’s Potato Park, Stone Village established the Coalition to reverse the decline of Dongba culture and strengthen customary rights. These efforts have garnered local governmental backing, aiding in the rejection of an ecologically damaging tobacco cash crop program. In 2016, the Coalition hosted an INMIP WW in Stone Village with 60 participants from 9 countries (China workshop). • Capacity Building: Collaboration with scientists has provided Stone Village with technical support in PPB, while Naxi wisdom in pest control and seed preservation has been validated and appreciated, highlighting an integrated approach to agricultural sustainability and livelihood resilience. • Community-Led Innovation: Each village contributes its unique strengths in the Coalition: (1) Stone Village: Merges traditional farming wisdom with scientific knowledge to adapt to ecological and climate changes. (2) Youmi Village: Centers community life around Dongba cultural and spiritual practices. (3) Labo Village: Offers unique biocultural insights and hosts a Daba museum.
Farmers' Seed Network
AsiaLocal
China
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
Nestled in the biodiversity hotspot of the Jinsha River Valley, the three Naxi villages of Stone, Youmi, and Labo have thrived for centuries, rooted in a rich biocultural heritage. The Naxi people, renowned for their harmonious relationship with nature, have sustainably managed their mountain landscapes for generations. Historically, the Naxi villages cultivated a diverse range of crops. However, in recent decades, this diversity has dwindled, with only two local corn hybrids planted in 2012, compared to over ten in the 1980s. This decline in crop diversity, coupled with the erosion of traditional knowledge, has weakened the resilience of the community. Additionally, climate change has exacerbated these challenges, with increased frequency and severity of droughts, floods, delayed rainy seasons, landslides, and pest outbreaks, further impacting livelihoods and traditional culture. In 2013, a participatory action research project, supported by the Farmers' Seed Network (FSN) and the United Nations Environment Programme - International Ecosystem Management Partnership (UNEP-IEMP), was initiated to conserve and sustainably use Naxi bio-cultural heritage and agrobiodiversity. Through a series of participatory activities, primarily led by women, a holistic approach was adopted to combine traditional knowledge with modern scientific techniques. This collaborative effort resulted in the establishment of the Naxi Mountain Villages Coalition in 2015, which aims to protect and sustainably utilize biodiversity, water resources, and other natural resources. The Coalition seeks to promote a harmonious coexistence between humans and nature by fostering community-based ecological culture and sustainable development. Since 2013, the action research project has worked to bridge the gap between traditional and scientific knowledge in agrobiodiversity and water management. Through participatory approaches, primarily led by women, the villagers have undertaken several initiatives: 1. Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB): Farmers, guided by scientists, have conducted trials on maize, legumes, and vegetables to identify and select varieties best suited to local conditions and culture. 2. Walking Workshops: These workshops facilitate peer-to-peer learning and knowledge sharing among farmers on topics such as seed management, agroecological practices, and water management techniques. 3. Farmers' Schools: Regular training sessions cover a range of topics, including video documentation, integrated pest management, post-harvest techniques, and water-efficient farming practices. 4. Community Seed Banks: Establishing community seed banks to preserve local crop varieties in all the villages. 5. Water Resource Management: Revitalizing and innovating traditional water management practices, such as above- and underground irrigation systems in Stone Village, to improve water efficiency and reduce soil erosion. To further enhance water resource management, the Coalition has incorporated modern technology, using GPS to map water channels. 6. Market Linkages: Connecting with urban consumers to promote the consumption of local, traditional foods and encourage participation in landrace conservation and agroecology. These initiatives have contributed to the in-situ conservation and sustainable utilization of agrobiodiversity, as well as the revitalization of Naxi traditional culture and knowledge. Importantly, women have been at the forefront of agricultural production, serving as custodians and leaders in both agrobiodiversity and water management. Female farmers have spearheaded initiatives like participatory plant breeding trials, seed bank management, and seed exchanges. They have also organized farmers' schools and utilized social media to share knowledge and inspire others. Moreover, they have created innovative, healthy recipes using local ingredients to nourish their communities.
2615NWPSearchableIteminfo@fsnchina.netsongxin@fsnchina.netTechnical document/report
https://www.fsnchina.info
https://youtu.be/qb4-na1UZlE?si=Xay3j47E7YSmpnIa;#Living Seeds and Resilient Bio-Cultures, Coexistence of Naxi communities with Nature;#https://www.fsnchina.info/fsn-cbd-cop16;#Farmers' Seed Network at COP16;#https://www.iied.org/20376g;#Indigenous Naxi-Moso cultural values and worldviews for sustainable development: Four Village Biocultural Heritage Coalition, Yunnan, China
  
2944502/12/2024 13:00Case study
1. A Climate Core Team and stakeholder group were established, including local authorities, researchers, and community members, to ensure community-driven adaptation strategies. 2. The IAP identified five fragile rural systems (water supply, road connectivity, health, livelihoods, and forest resources) that were most vulnerable to climate impacts. 3. Over 40 resilience interventions were developed to improve rural adaptive capacity, many of which were aligned with existing government programs for easier integration. 4. Some of the intervention strategies are cost effective and could be implemented immediately while others require considerable injection of funds and the political willingness of policy makers to turn such intervention into a reality.
Civil society
1. The IAP identified five vulnerable rural systems for the Ramgad watershed. 2. The level of vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change impacts was determined by producing a Vulnerability and Risk Assessment matrix. 3. Over 40 Rural Intervention Strategies were developed. 4. Intervention strategies were aligned with existing rural plans to combat climate change impacts. 5. A recommendation was developed for determining the effectiveness of the IAP in rural areas. 6. Improvements in the IAP process for rural systems were identified. 7. Eight early career scientists from Kumaun University were trained on using the IAP Toolkit.
Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
AsiaRegional
India
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
Heath, L. C., Tiwari, P., Sadhukhan, B., Tiwari, S., Chapagain, P., Xu, T., Yan, J. (2020). Building climate change resilience by using a versatile toolkit for local governments and communities in rural Himalaya. Environmental Research, 188, 109636. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109636 Heath, L., Tiwari, P., Sadhukhan, B., Tiwari, S., Joshi, B., Ailikun, Yan, J. (2018). Using a participatory-based toolkit to build resilience and adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in rural India: A new paradigm shift for rural communities in the Himalaya. APN Science Bulletin, 8(1). doi:10.30852/sb.2018.292
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentCommunity-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction
crmmocservices
This project aimed to develop a climate change adaptation toolkit to enhance community resilience in the Ramgad Watershed, Uttarakhand, India. The region is highly vulnerable to changing monsoon patterns, extreme weather events, and glacial melt, which affect water, food, and energy security. The project used the ICLEI/Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) toolkit referred to as IAP Toolkit, to assess climate risks and identify adaptive strategies for rural systems. By integrating local knowledge and scientific data, it focused on building adaptive capacity and resilience in this rural Himalayan area. The IAP produced over 40 resilience interventions for vulnerable communities. The results of this work also revealed that adaptive capacity and resilience in this rural jurisdiction were much lower compared to those of urban settings. Perhaps, rural regions typically have less resources available to measure threats, disruptions and impacts compared to their city counterparts. There is also a lack of information to help communities to respond to climate induced threats and disruptions.
2614NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2944402/12/2024 13:00Case study
1. Integration of Local and Scientific Knowledge: Combining local knowledge with scientific tools like the DSI greatly enhanced the effectiveness of drought monitoring. 2. Tailored Outreach: Developing localized awareness materials in the local language (Nepali) was crucial for better community engagement and understanding. 3. Collaborative Approach: Involving local communities, policymakers, and academic institutions from multiple countries ensured that the project outputs were practical and applicable across different regions. 4. Need for Continuous Capacity Building: The project incorporated ongoing training by establishing a framework for the continuous application of drought monitoring tools like the Drought Severity Index (DSI) and satellite remote sensing. A notable example is the training workshop on satellite remote sensing and DSI held in Nepal, where participants were encouraged to engage in future drought monitoring efforts. Additionally, the Drought Atlases and training materials were made openly accessible to facilitate future use and updates by researchers and policymakers across the region. The project report also emphasized the potential for scaling up training efforts and tools, encouraging regional stakeholders in Nepal, Bangladesh, India (Sikkim), and Pakistan to continue monitoring and adapting drought interventions using the skills and resources acquired during the project. 5. Value of Traditional Practices: The project documented traditional drought coping mechanisms, particularly among fish farmers in Chitwan, Nepal, providing valuable insights into community-based resilience strategies. This documentation was published in a peer-reviewed paper aimed at a broad audience, including academics, researchers, and practitioners working in the fields of agriculture, climate adaptation, and water resource management. The findings from this research are referenced in journals such as the Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University, where the study on fish farming practices during drought was published. These publications target both scientific communities and policy makers, with the intention of informing future adaptation measures and promoting the inclusion of traditional knowledge in scientific and governmental planning efforts.
Civil society
1. Developed 240 drought maps and four Drought Atlases (for Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sikkim) based on 20 years of data. 2. Trained 15 researchers in using satellite remote sensing and the Drought Severity Index (DSI). 3. Produced a Nepali-language drought literacy booklet to raise awareness among local communities, especially farmers and school children. 4. Documented traditional drought coping mechanisms, particularly among fish farmers in Chitwan, Nepal. 5. Enhanced regional capacity to monitor and manage drought impacts on food and water resources.The project conducted three workshops in Nepal and Bangladesh, engaging a diverse group of stakeholders, including local communities, policymakers, researchers, and government officials. 6. A total of 15 researchers from institutions like the Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Tribhuvan University (Nepal), and Sikkim University (India) were trained in the use of satellite remote sensing and the Drought Severity Index (DSI). 7. Workshops were attended by local government officials, researchers from the Center for Climate Research and Development (Pakistan), and representatives from Khulna University (Bangladesh). 8. This capacity-building effort was aimed at improving the ability of these stakeholders to apply drought monitoring tools and adapt food and water resource management to mitigate drought impacts across Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India (Sikkim). 9. Increased awareness among stakeholders, improving education and planning for future drought-related interventions.
Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
AsiaRegional
Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
Kafle, H. K. (2022). The Drought Atlas of Bangladesh. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. Kafle, H. K. (2022). The Drought Atlas of Pakistan. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. Kafle, H. K. (2022). The Drought Atlas of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. Kafle, H. K. (2022). The Drought Atlas of Sikkim. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. Kafle, H. K. (2022). The Drought Atlas of South Asia. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. Kafle, H. K., Rasheed, A., Koirala, D., Shrestha, D., Gyawali, D., Kamruzzaman, M., Sobue., S., Wajih, S.A., Khawas, V. & Yamaguchi, Y. (2022). Improving assessment of drought and its impact on food and water resources in South Asia. Technical Report. Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research. Neupane, P., Rai, S., Kafle, H., & Ranjan, R. (2022). Growth performance of different fish species during dry period in Chitwan, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.3126/jafu.v5i1.48462 Kafle, H., Khaitu, S., Gyawali, D., Shrestha, D., Koirala, D., Kamaruzzaman, M., ... Yamaguchi, Y. (2023). Historical drought and its trend in South Asia: Spatial and temporal analysis 2000-2020. APN Science Bulletin, 12(1). doi:10.30852/sb.2022.2022 Nogrady, B (2022). We built a science institute from scratch. Nature 607(414). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01902-w
Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Science and research, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Food security, Water resources
crmmocservices
This project aimed to address the lack of awareness-raising products and early warning systems for drought and other hazards affecting the Himalayas and downstream communities. The project developed drought maps and drought atlases, using freely available satellite data, to monitor and assess the impacts of drought on food and water resources in South Asia. It targeted four countries—Bangladesh, India (Sikkim), Nepal, and Pakistan—where rural economies heavily dependent on rainfed agriculture are particularly vulnerable to droughts. By integrating traditional knowledge with scientific data, the project enhanced capacity building for local communities, researchers, and policymakers to better manage the risks associated with drought.
2613NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2944302/12/2024 13:00Case study
1. Use of Geospatial Tools: The project successfully utilized geospatial tools like GIS and the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method to identify suitable locations for rainwater harvesting structures. This enhanced the precision of site selection, improving water resource management. 2. Capacity Building: Through workshops and hands-on training, 20 young researchers and 65 professionals were trained on hydrogeology, boosting local capacity to manage groundwater and implement rainwater harvesting solutions. 3. Community Engagement: Awareness campaigns and workshops, especially the use of a mobile app, enabled local communities to understand and adopt rainwater harvesting practices. 4. Tailored Solutions: The project emphasised the need for site-specific and community-specific interventions, bridging both traditional knowledge and modern tools.
Civil society
1. Developed an Android-based mobile application, "Aakaashepani," which allows users to calculate the optimal tank size for rainwater harvesting systems. This tool has empowered local households and communities to implement rainwater harvesting efficiently, making technology accessible and user-friendly. 2. Enhanced scalability potential: The project produced a site suitability map for rainwater harvesting structures in the Karnali Basin, which, along with the mobile application, has high potential to be scaled up and replicated in other regions of Nepal and beyond. This offers long-term sustainability and paves the way for further adaptation solutions, contributing to water security efforts in diverse geographies. 3. Training of 20 young researchers and 65 professionals, which improved the region's capacity to manage water resources and address drought risks. 4. Conducted workshops and community campaigns, enhancing awareness and practical knowledge of rainwater harvesting and water resource management. 5. Dissemination of findings through national and international conferences, publications, and media outreach, increasing the visibility of rainwater harvesting as a viable solution for water-scarce regions. 6. The project significantly improved the capacity of local decision-makers and government officials to prioritize groundwater recharge sites, ensuring informed decision-making for water resource management at both local and national levels.
Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
AsiaLocal
Nepal
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
Publications: Panthi, J., et al. "Water poverty in the context of climate change: a case study from Karnali river basin in Nepal Himalaya." International Journal of River Basin Management 17.2 (2019): 243-250 DOI:10.1080/15715124.2018.1531421 Poster Presentations Panthi, J.; Kirat, N. H.; Pradhananga, D.; Dahal, P.; Khatiwada, K. R.; Gajurel, S. 2018. ICT for Combating Drought in the Karnali River Basin of Nepal Himalaya, AGU Fall Meeting 2018 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFM.H53Q1821P Dahal P., Panthi, J, Kirat, N. H.; Pradhananga, D.; Gajurel, S 2018. Rainwater Harvesting Suitability Map Using Free Data And Tools – An Application in Mountainous Basin in the Himalayas MtnClimate conference organized at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL) in Gothic, Colorado USA http://www.rmbl.org/mtn-clim-2018/ Panthi, J.; Dahal, P.; Shrestha, M. L.; Khatiwada, K. R. 2018. Changing Climate Altering the Hydrological Regime – A Case from Karnali Basin in Nepal Himalaya. http://www.rmbl.org/mtn-clim-2018/ Panthi, J.; Dahal, P; Kirat, N. H.; Pradhananga, D..; Khatiwada, K. R.; Gajurel, S. 2019. Useful to usable: Application of geospatial information in community water management in Karnali basin in Western Nepal, AGU Fall Meeting 2019, https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/5019
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Stakeholder involvement, Technology supportCommunity-based adaptation, Water resources
crmmocservices
This project aimed to mitigate the impact of drought and enhance water security in the Karnali Basin, Western Nepal, by developing rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems. The focus was on using rainwater harvesting structures to recharge groundwater and address water scarcity in a region vulnerable to climate variability. A key output was the development of a site suitability map for different rainwater harvesting structures. Additionally, an Android-based mobile application, "Aakaashepani," was created to assist households and communities in calculating optimal rainwater harvesting tank sizes based on local conditions. This user-friendly app facilitated the wider adoption of rooftop rainwater harvesting systems across different elevations in the Karnali Basin.
2612NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2944202/12/2024 13:00Case study
A key lesson from the Potato Park is that traditional knowledge, crop repatriation, cultural values, such as reciprocity, balance and solidarity with nature and in society, and precolonial wellbeing concepts such as Buen Vivir provide critical strategies for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Cultural values and ancestral concepts can provide normative principles for collective landscape management, and the foundations for building collective institutions and action to confront climate challenges, conserve biodiversity and ecosystems, and defend land rights effectively. Furthermore traditional knowledge is not old or static and provides vital knowledge of local ecosystems and agrobiodiversity for adaptive management and innovation. The Potato Park's impacts and success are underpinned by its decolonising action-research methodology, co-created by ANDES and the Potato Park communities, with support from IIED, which centres indigenous concepts and reinforces TK transmission through the process.
Civil society
The Potato Park has reversed the loss of native crop diversity and restored this diversity in a centre of origin of potato, and now conserves about 1400 native potato varieties (according to traditional classification). It has also revitalised Andean traditional knowledge, values, cosmovision and customary laws, that conserve ecosystems and promote solidarity and equity, and created a strong, living TK system. Restoring their rich biocultural heritage has enabled the Potato Park communities to enhance food and nutrition security, despite serious impacts from climate change - for example the lowest planting line for potatoes has risen by 200 metres in the last 30 years due to rising soil temperatures and pests. The communities have developed several innovations (institutional, technological, market and policy innovations) based on TK or linking TK and science. They conserve ancestral potato varieties and continually improve and adapt agrobiodiversity to changing conditions, providing a wealth of traits that are adapted to different conditions and tolerate different stressors (pests, diseases, frost, drought etc). They also conserve 3 wild potato relatives. Thus, the Potato Park provides a critical genetic reserve for climate adaptation and food security locally, nationally and globally. The communities conduct systematic monitoring of climate change impacts on native potatoes through altitudinal transects and observe changes daily rituals to mountain goads and wildlife indicators. The microenterprises have doubled incomes and at the end of each year 10% of the revenues are shared in accordance with customary laws for conservation and equity. This fund also covers the cost of a park administrator. Hence the Park is largely self-sustaining. It has been registered as an Agrobiodiversity Zone providing legal protection against the threat of mining. The Park also contributes to climate change mitigation by conserving natural pastures and water, and low-carbon lifestyles rooted in traditional knowledge and cultural and spiritual values that do not prioritise human economic growth over the environment.
International Institute for Environment and Development
South AmericaLocal
Peru
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
Indigenous Seed Systems and Biocultural Heritage: The Andean Potato Park's Approach to Seed Governance Krystyna Swiderska and Alejandro Argumedo (2021) https://www.iied.org/21281x Biocultural heritage territories: key to halting biodiversity loss. Swiderska, Argumedo and Pimbert (2020). https://www.iied.org/17760iied Traditional mountain landscapes: critical for meeting biodiversity and climate goals. Swiderska et al (2022). https://www.iied.org/21241iied
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge managementBiodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Food security, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The Potato Park is an Indigenous Biocultural Heritage Territory in the high Andes, near Cusco, that is collectively governed by 5 Quechua communities based on customary laws. It spans about 9,200 hectares and 3,400 to 4,600 masl. The Potato Park's aim is Sumaq Kawsay which in the Andean philosophy of Buen Vivir or holistic wellbeing, where the human (and domesticated), the wild and the sacred communities (Ayllus) have to be in balance and reciprocity to achieve the wellbeing of all 3. The Potato Park brought together neighbouring communities through the potato, a symbol of common cultural and spiritual heritage and key resource. With support from Asociacion ANDES (Peru) and IIED, the communities registered a Potato Park Association in 2002, established a number of economic collectives for biocultural products (potato guardians, crafts, medicinal plants) and services (gastronomy, ecotourism), and a established an agreement with the International Potato Park for the repatriation and monitoring of 410 native varieties. The Potato Park also developed an inter-community agreement for equitable benefit-sharing and established a communal fund for benefit-sharing of 10% of profits from economic collectives; and established a community seed bank which is managed by local experts (potato guardians collective).
2611NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2944102/12/2024 13:00Tool
See examples at: https://gfmc.online/
Civil society
Global Fire Monitoring Centre
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
https://gfmc.online/iwpm/tools-3.html
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge managementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Food security, Gender, Health, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
Tools of the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) for advising / supporting nations and the United Nations in Capacity Building in Landscape Fire Management and Wildfire Disaster Risk Reduction The GFMC offers a number of tools for development capabilities in Integrated Landscape Fire Management that may either be used directly online or be requested for implementation by interested parties. Some tools will require finances for implementation
2509NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/reportGlobal
  
2944002/12/2024 13:00Case study
Local communities are willing and able to take responsibility in implementing practices of Integrated Landscape Fire Management aimed at creating wildfire-resilient landscapes and society, and promoting the safe and environmentally benign use of fire in sustainable land management. The results show that the Global North may learn from the expertise of the Global South
Civil society, Non-governmental organization - NGO, Regional center/network/initiative, Research institution, UN and affiliated organization, University/education/training organization
The volume presents the state-of-the-art expertise in community-based fire management
Global Fire Monitoring Center
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
Global South
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector02/12/2024 13:00crmmocservices
English Version: Pasiecznik, N. and J.G. Goldammer (eds.). 2022. Towards Fire-smart Landscapes. Tropical Forest Issues 61 (TFI 61), xiv + 191 p. (PDF, 11 MB) https://gfmc.online/wp-content/uploads/TFI61-Towards-Fire-Smart-Landscapes.pdf Spanish Version: Pasiecznik, N. and J.G. Goldammer (eds.). 2022. Hacia la construcción de paisajes a prueba de incendio. Tropical Forest Issues 61 (TFI 61), xvi + 211 p. (PDF, 9.5 MB) https://gfmc.online/wp-content/uploads/TFI61-Hacia-construccion-paisajes-prueba-incendios.pdf
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Gender, Health, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
The volume “Towards Fire-smart Landscapes” was developed in 2021-2022 by Tropenbos and GFMC (N. Pasiecznik and J.G. Goldammer, eds.), with contributions of more than 100 co-authors from tropical South America, Asia and Africa. The book was presented at UNFCCC COP-26 (Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 12 November 2022), at the Global Landscapes Forum, Session “Fire-smart landscapes as promising approach for effective adaptation and mitigation” and at the 8th International Wildland Fire Conference (Porto, Portugal, 16-19 May 2023). The book is available online in English and Spanish
2508NWPSearchableItemfire@fire.uni-freiburg.dejohann.goldammer@fire.uni-freiburg.deTechnical document/report
https://gfmc.online/
  
2943927/11/2024 09:30NWP Partner profile
Non-governmental organization - NGO
Global, Local, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
27/11/2024 09:30crmmocservices
Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Knowledge management, Science and research, Stakeholder involvementCoastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Water resources
crmmocservices
ICCI has worked since 2010 in bringing together government representatives, climate negotiators, scientiists, civil society, and local populations, and - while a primary focus must be on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and stopping climate change - the cryosphere also creates the possibility of complementary climate solutions that benefit those living nearby, especially Arctic Indigenous and mountain peoples. We believe that much can be accomplished if many partners work together, and ICCI worries less about credit than accomplishing needed solutions at all levels. ICCI therefore strives to work innovatively, yet without fanfare and in a sustained manner, to create new partnerships and approaches together with cryosphere scientists, governments, non-governmental organizations and the private sector – yet always with the clock ticking for the cryosphere’s survival; and therefore, that of the planet, at least as it has existed for the past 3 million years.
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://iccinet.org/, https://iccinet.org/
  
2943801/10/2024 07:30NWP Partner profile
Civil society, University/education/training organization
Global, Local, National
01/10/2024 07:30crmmocservices
Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Education and training, Monitoring and evaluation/M&EAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Biodiversity, Energy
crmmocservices
Protect Your Environment Foundation is a non profit making organization with main motive to fight against the devastating effects of climate change in Cameroon in Particular and the world at large Founded in 2018 in Yaoundé,we have three basic activities namely green transport and clean mobility, green cities and eco school.In October 2024 we shall officially be running a Higher institute of climate change and environmental studies in Yaounde and our aim is to make the world go green by 2050
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://protectyef.org/, https://protectyef.org/
  
2943701/10/2024 07:30Case study
The Carpathians are home to important ecosystems, have cultural significance and are important sources of water for the surrounding regions. The mountain range is threatened by demographic trends, energy and agricultural demands, tourism and climate change, which in turn affect mountain water resources and water availability in the region. Strategies and plans to mitigate these problems are being developed at national level, but there is still a need for a more integrated approach, for example linking land use management with water management and creating incentives for the protection of mountainous ecosystems. Moreover, the countries recognise that many of the problems can only be tackled effectively by working together with their neighbours. The Carpathian Convention reflects this need for cooperation. In addition, the transboundary basin organizations International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) and the Commission on Sustainable Use and Protection of the Dniester River Basin pay considerable attention to mountains and glaciers in the overall river basin management process as well as in specific thematic areas of cooperation such as adaptation, conservation, flood management and monitoring. Discussions in these transboundary organizations, where knowledge and experience are also exchanged, help to stimulate activities at the national level.
Private sector
The Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians (Carpathian Convention), a multinational environmental agreement between the seven Carpathian countries that entered into force in 2003, aims to protect the natural and cultural heritage of the Carpathian region while promoting sustainable development. Local stakeholders and communities are engaged through the so-called ‘Carpathian Day’, that is organized in conjunction with the Conference of the Parties. Stakeholders can also participate in convention meetings as observer. Among other things, the Convention has led to the establishment of a transboundary Ramsar site in the Đerdap gorge (Iron Gate) National Park and improved protection of mountain forests. Climate adaptation is also being mainstreamed into other policy areas such as land use management, agriculture and tourism (UNEP, 2023; Climate ADAPT, 2024). The Carpathian Convention works closely with the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) (ICPDR, 2014). For example, the Danube Climate Adaptation Study (ICPDR, 2018) includes the impacts of climate change in the Carpathians and the Danube Flood Management Plan (ICPDR, 2021) includes flood risk management measures in the Carpathians which then are translated into practices for implementation by countries on the national level. In addition, the Carpathian dimension is also well-reflected in the activities of the Commission on Sustainable Use and Protection of the Dniester River Basin (the Dniester Commission). For instance, its Working Group on Ecosystems and Biodiversity dedicates particular attention to the Carpathian region through taking measures for conserving and increasing forest resources and small rivers to improve water storage (Dniester Commission, 2024a) and its Working Group on Emergencies has identified a few priority areas in the Carpathians and performed flood risk modelling and mapping there followed by development of the flood risk management plans according to the Floods Directive (Directive 2007/60/EC) on the assessment and management of flood risks)) (Dniester Commission, 2024b).
Waterframes
EuropeTransboundary
Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, the Slovak Republic, and Ukraine
Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector01/10/2024 07:30crmmocservices
Alberton, M.; Andresen, M.; Citadino, F.; Egerer, H.; Fritsch, U.; Götsch, H.; Hoffmann, C.; Klemm, J.; Mitrofanenko, A.; Musco, E.; Noellenburg, N.; Pettita, M.; Renner, K.; Zebisch, M. (2017). Outlook on climate change adaptation in the Carpathian mountains. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal and Eurac Research, Nairobi, Vienna, Arendal and Bolzano. http://www.carpathianconvention.org/tl_files/carpathiancon/Downloads/02%20Activities/Climate%20Change/MP_Carpathians_lores.pdf Climate ADAPT, 2024. Adaptation in Carpathian Mountains. https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/countries-regions/transnational-regions/carpathian-mountains/general Dniester Commission, 2024a. Working Group on Ecosystems and Biodiversity. https://dniester-commission.org/en/joint-management/dniester-commission/working-groups/working-group-on-ecosystems-and-biodiversity Dniester Commission, 2024b. Working Group on Emergencies. https://dniester-commission.org/en/joint-management/dniester-commission/working-groups/working-group-on-emergencies ICPDR, 2014. The ICPDR and its observers: inspiring wider interaction with stakeholders. https://www.icpdr.org/publications/icpdr-and-its-observers-inspiring-wider-interaction-stakeholders ICPDR, 2018. Revision and Update of the Danube Study. https://www.icpdr.org/sites/default/files/nodes/documents/danube_climate_adaptation_study_2018.pdf ICPDR, 2021. Danube Flood Management Plan. https://www.icpdr.org/sites/default/files/nodes/documents/dfrmp_update_2021_lores_0.pdf UNEP, 2022. The Environmental Impact of the Conflict in Ukraine: A Preliminary Review. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/40746 UNEP, 2023. The Carpathian Convention marks its 20th anniversary with a new Biodiversity Framework and a transboundary protected wetland. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/carpathian-convention-marks-its-20th-anniversary-new-biodiversity Ministry of Climate and Environment of Poland, 2022. Impact of war on natural environment of the Carpathians in Ukraine https://www.gov.pl/attachment/9ed63b69-87d8-4c52-a74a-1c88385f5508 Western Bug and Sian River Basin Management Authority in Ukraine, 2024. Materials of the Western Bug and Sian River Basin Management Authority in Ukraine. https://buvrzbts.davr.gov.ua/
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and researchAgriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystems, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Tourism, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Carpathian Mountain region is shared by the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, the Slovak Republic, and Ukraine (Figure 7.6). The Carpathian Mountains are home to approximately 30% of the European flora and to Europe’s largest populations of brown bear, wolf, lynx, European bison and rare bird species. The semi-natural habitats such as mountain pastures and hay meadows are of great ecological and cultural importance. The Carpathian Mountain region provides important ecosystem goods and services such as food, freshwater, forest products and tourism. The region drains into three major river basins: the Danube and the Dniester, which flow to the Black Sea, and the Vistula, which flows to the Baltic Sea (Climate ADAPT, 2024; UNEP, 2023). Land abandonment, habitat conversion and fragmentation, deforestation, and unsustainable forestry and agricultural practices lead to increased runoff and erosion and threaten biodiversity in the mountains. Agriculture is the main source of surface and groundwater pollution (Climate ADAPT, 2024). Climate change is leading to higher summer temperatures and an increase in the frequency and intensity of heat waves. Precipitation patterns are predicted to change, with less rainfall in summer leading to reduced river flows and increased water scarcity, and more intense, short-duration rainfall with an increased risk of flooding, erosion and landslides, affecting livelihoods and settlements. Snow seasons will become shorter, threatening local winter tourism but extending the growing season for agriculture. Earlier snowmelt will reduce river flows and summer drinking water supplies as well as reduce groundwater recharge and will increase the risk of wildfires (Alberton et al. 2017). The Carpathian region is also impacted by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, putting significant pressure on natural resources, both directly through the pollution from the destruction of infrastructure in the Carpathians region (e.g. discharge of petroleum products into the Dniester and the Vistula basins due to military attacks on oil depots and electricity stations (Western Bug and Sian River Basin Management Authority in Ukraine, 2024) and indirectly on forests (increased fuelwood consumption due to disruptions in energy supply (e.g. liquid fuels and electricity)) that in turn increase the flood risk. The war also poses major challenges to protected areas management such as a considerable reduction in funding for conservation as well as reduction in personnel by and the military mobilization of personnel in Ukraine, increasing the flood risk (Ministry of Climate and Environment of Poland, 2022; UNEP, 2022). Increasing the sustainability of water management requires the integration of land use management into water resource management. This includes protecting ecosystems, paying more attention to water retention in soils as well as water storage, rainwater harvesting, preventing surface erosion especially on agricultural land, preventing forest degradation and adapting the management of existing water infrastructure. Prevention and preparedness for floods and landslides is also needed, including the development of flood maps and integrated hazard zone maps. The Carpathian countries have included many of these measures in their national environmental strategies (Alberton et al., 2017).
2600NWPSearchableItemjos.timmerman@waterframes.nlTechnical document/report
https://www.waterframes.nl
  
2943630/09/2024 09:00Case study
Implementation of the strategic framework is key. The Alpine Climate Board is now supporting the implementation of the Climate Action Plan 2.0 through matchmaking and capacity-building events, collection and dissemination of good practices, and elaboration of recommendations. Currently, it is clustering its activities on cross-sectoral hotspots: nature-based solutions, energy, and lifestyles. Good practice collections have been carried out and publicised in all three hotspot areas.
Intergovernmental organization - IGO
The Alpine Climate Board designed strategic foundations for joint climate action, namely the Alpine Climate Target System 2050 and the mid-term Climate Action Plan 2.0. This framework provides a roadmap for adaptation and mitigation, offering a clear vision and proposing concrete measures to address climate change in all relevant sectors.
Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention
EuropeRegional, Transboundary
Italy, Austria, France, Switzerland, Germany, Slovenia, Liechtenstein, Monaco
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector30/09/2024 09:00crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Institutional arrangements, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvementAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Heavy industry, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Infrastructure, Services, Tourism, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
The Alpine Convention, signed in 1991, commits the eight Alpine countries and the European Union to protect and sustainably develop the European Alps. It encompasses a framework convention and eight thematic protocols. While none of the protocols are specifically dedicated to climate, climate change has consistently been a priority in the successive Multi-Annual Work Programmes. A driving force in the Convention's action on climate is the Alpine Climate Board, a working body with representatives of member countries and observers, which serves as a platform for bundling forces and fostering collaborative efforts.
2599NWPSearchableItemnathalie.morelle@alpconv.orgTechnical document/report
https://www.alpconv.org
  
2529922/04/2016 11:56NWP Partner profilePartner
Regional center/network/initiative, Research institution
AsiaRegional
26/09/2024 10:39No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Disaster risk reduction, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender
Roberto Felix
The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, ICIMOD, is a regional knowledge development and learning centre serving the eight regional member countries of the Hindu Kush-Himalayas – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, and Pakistan – and based in Kathmandu, Nepal. Globalisation and climate change have an increasing influence on the stability of fragile mountain ecosystems and the livelihoods of mountain people. ICIMOD aims to assist mountain people to understand these changes, adapt to them, and make the most of new opportunities, while addressing upstream-downstream issues. We support regional transboundary programmes through partnership with regional partner institutions, facilitate the exchange of experience, and serve as a regional knowledge hub. We strengthen networking among regional and global centres of excellence. Overall, we are working to develop an economically and environmentally sound mountain ecosystem to improve the living standards of mountain populations and to sustain vital ecosystem services for the billions of people living downstream – now, and for the future. 
NWPSearchableItempradyumna.rana@icimod.orgkunzang@icimod.org
  
2542522/04/2016 11:56NWP Partner profilePartner
UN and affiliated organization
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, Polar regions, South AmericaGlobal
26/09/2024 10:14No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and researchAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Coastal areas/zones, Disaster risk reduction, Tourism
Roberto Felix
-
NWPSearchableItemrk.nguma@unesco.orgn.crawhall@unesco.org
  
2943519/09/2024 09:30NWP Partner profile
UN and affiliated organization
Global, Local, National, Regional, Subregional, Transboundary
19/09/2024 09:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Education and training, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Vulnerability assessmentAdaptation finance, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Energy, Food security, Gender, Health, Human settlements, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Services, Urban resilience, Water resources
crmmocservices
The mission of the United Nations University is to contribute, through collaborative research and education, to efforts to resolve the pressing global problems of human survival, development, and welfare that are the concern of the United Nations, its Peoples, and Member States. In carrying out this mission, UNU works with leading universities and research institutes in UN Member States, functioning as a bridge between the international academic community and the United Nations system. The United Nations University encompasses 13 institutes located in 12 countries around the world. The global UNU system is coordinated by UNU Headquarters in Tokyo. Through its different institutes, UNU maintains close working relationships with other UN agencies, programmes, commissions, funds and convention secretariats to fulfill its role as the academic arm of the United Nations and to act as a global think tank, e.g. The UNU Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS, Bonn, Germany) focuses on advancing human security and well-being by reducing current and future risks from environmental hazards and climate change. UNU-EHS carries out cutting edge research on risks and adaptation related to environmental hazards and global change and promotes policies and programmes to reduce these risks, while considering the interplay between environmental and societal factors. The Risk and Adaptation Department focuses on understanding and addressing interconnected risks and the adverse impacts of climate change in science and policy based on a variety of different, yet complementary work streams. The Transformation Department creates positive visions of possible futures and catalyses new coalitions and actions for a sustainable and climate resilient world, human well-being, sustainability and equity. The UNU Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES, Dresden, Germany) aims to advance the resource nexus for all environmental resources (water, soil, waste, energy, and other geo-resources) that are of concern to the United Nations and its Member States — particularly in developing and emerging economies, and in scientific, educational, managerial, technological, and institutional aspects. The UNU Institute for Natural Resources in Africa (UNU-INRA, Accra, Ghana) focuses four core areas: conducting research on natural resources management issues in Africa, supporting capacity development of key stakeholders (universities, research institutions, and individuals) across the continent, offering policy-relevant advice to various stakeholders (including African governments), and sharing and transferring knowledge. The Institute operates from its main office in Accra, Ghana and carries out some of its programme activities through a network of operational units in five African countries. The UNU Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH, Hamilton, ON, Canada) focuses on water for development, working primarily with countries in the Global South and addressing water issues of global significance. Water is the entry point to all UNU-INWEH’s activities, including environment and health. The Institute addresses primarily continental water resources challenges. UNU-INWEH works to bridge the gap between the wealth of evidence and research that exists on water resources and the practical needs of political leaders and decision-makers in low- and middle-income countries. The UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER, Helsinki, Finland) provides economic analysis and policy advice with the aim of promoting sustainable and equitable development for all. The institute began operations over 30 years ago in Helsinki, Finland, as the first research centre of the United Nations University. Today it is a unique blend of think tank, research institute, and UN agency – providing a range of services from policy advice to governments as well as freely available original research. Over the period 2019–23, UNU-WIDER research is focused on the interlinked development challenges of transforming economies, states, and societies in support of achieving the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Three key concerns integrated throughout the research programme are fragility and risk, empowerment, knowledge and capacity.
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://unu.edu/, https://unu.edu/
  
2544322/04/2016 11:57NWP Partner profilePartner
UN and affiliated organization
11/09/2024 21:59No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training
Roberto Felix
-
NWPSearchableItemzissener@ehs.unu.edu
  
2322021/04/2016 10:39Case studyEbA
The outcomes achieved by the West Arnhem Fire project have potential application across fire-prone tropical Australia and other fire-prone savannas of the tropics. Fire management provides co-benefits, including climate change mitigation and economic benefits through employment. However, it requires repeated annual implementation in order to be successful.
National/public entity
Limiting wildfires in this way prevents the degradation of different plant communities and helps conserve environmental and cultural values in Arnhem Land. Greenhouse gas emissions are also reduced as studies have shown that early dry season fires emit less greenhouse gases per area affected than the more intense, late dry season fires. A partnership with the owners of a nearby Liquefied Natural Gas plant provides around US$1 million to the Aboriginal Traditional Owners of Western Arnhem Land to implement the annual prescribed burning, to offset an estimated 100,000 tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year.

​Northern Territory Government, Australia

Pacific/Oceania
Australia
11/09/2024 10:35No presence informationKelsey Warren
ProAct Network 2008. The Role of Environmental Management and eco-engineering in Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation: https://www.unisdr.org/files/4148_em.report.annex1.pdf​ 
Colls, A., Ash, N. and Ikkala, N (2009). Ecosystem-based Adaptation: a natural response to climate change. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: https://www.iucn.org/content/ecosystem-based-adaptation-a-natural-response-climate-change​
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity buildingAgriculture, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation
Roberto Felix
West Arnhem Land is a remote, tropical savanna region in Australia’s Northern Territory. Wildfires play an important role in the management of the ecosystem, although uncontrolled wildfires are a risk to adjacent land managers and globally significant rock art sites, and can threaten ecosystems, overwhelming their adaptive defences. Climate change impacts are expected to increase the size, intensity, and frequency of wildfires in Australia, and extend the fire season. The intervention involves prescribed fire management to avoid seasonally occurring disastrous wildfires, in partnership with the local Aboriginal people who manage parts of Arnhem Land in this way, resulting in a low incidence of devastating wildfires.
NWPSearchableItem
  
2943423/08/2024 10:00NWP Partner profile
Global, National, Regional, Transboundary
27/08/2024 10:37No presence informationKelsey Warren
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Technology support, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Health, Adaptation finance, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Urban resilience, Services
crmmocservices

The IGAD Centre of Excellence for Climate Adaptation and Environmental Protection (IGAD CAEP) based in Mogadishu, Somalia, is mandated to coordinate climate change adaptation, Loss and damage and Environmental Protection efforts in the eight IGAD countries comprising Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan and Uganda. 

 

IGAD CAEP was established due to recognition of the level of vulnerability and the need for proactive measures. Nearly 70 per cent of the IGAD region comprising countries including Kenya, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Uganda, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan is made up of Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASALs), which receive less than 600 mm of rainfall annually. A significant proportion of the population lives below the poverty line, with regional variations. Political, socioeconomic and environmental conditions remain fragile in most countries. Climate change continues to exacerbate an already precarious situation acting as a threat multiplier with its impacts on livelihood systems, water resources, conflict, gender inequality, displacement, health, education and disaster risk management.

 

The IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) titled Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability indicated that Africa, including the IGAD region, is already grappling with severe impacts of climate change, with projections pointing to worrying trends without deep cuts to global carbon emissions and a significant scaling up of climate change adaptation. Although Africa accounts for less than 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, it hasn’t been left behind in reducing emissions, as shown by its commitment to the Paris Agreement. However, climate change adaptation remains the region's highest priority due to its current and future vulnerability. 

 

The Centre’s goal is to catalyse coordinated and sustained adaptation planning, decision-making and action across the IGAD region and to support the region in preparing for and adapting to the impacts posed by the changing climate, including frequent droughts, floods, cyclones, sea level rise, sandstorms, and desert locust infestation among other effects.

 

The Centre supports the implementation of National Adaptation Plans (NAP), Updated NDCs and other relevant adaptation-related policies of member states.

 

The Centre seeks to address climate change as a crosscutting matter and coordinate the integration of climate risk and vulnerability assessments in policy development and planning. The centre undertakes climate adaptation programs to minimise risks, safeguard livelihoods, prevent conflicts, take advantage of opportunities, and increase resilience to climate change’s negative impacts.

 The Centre also serves as the focal institution for knowledge management and capacity development to study, replicate and scale appropriate adaptive solutions and strengthen climate resilience.

 

IGAD CAEP also strongly supports IGAD Member State’s Loss-and-damage agenda to ensure it does not undermine efforts towards achieving sustainable development, peace, and stability. The costs of climate-related loss and damages are primarily met by already vulnerable communities and countries trapped in a deep debt climate cycle forced to borrow to firefight one climate-related shock after another, especially droughts and floods. The conversation on loss and damage is inherently about equity. It evokes the question: Why should the IGAD region responsible for less than 1% of global emissions be responsible for the damage resulting from the emissions of wealthy countries? In line with this, IGAD CAEP advocates for enhanced NDC ambitions, especially by the global north and high GHG emitters, to cut GHG emissions, Support Member States in undertaking loss and damage research and capacity development, Support Member States and communities in advocating for reliable and comprehensive loss and damage funding to address the ever-increasing cost of climate impact-related loss and damage burden, which is unsustainable, Advocate for and support regional climate justice agenda that puts vulnerable populations, including women, Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), refugees, migrants, children, and minority communities, front and centre of the Loss and Damage discourse and Support efforts to curate interactive discussions in the region that bring the Loss and Damage community and other relevant stakeholders together to ensure coordination and alignment and provide a platform for sharing loss and damage knowledge and ideas, including scientific and indigenous technologies.​

NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2939209/05/2024 13:30NWP Partner profile
Global
26/08/2024 10:16No presence informationKelsey Warren
Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Stakeholder involvementAgriculture, Food security, Biodiversity, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
1.Official launch of Women in Africa For Sustainable Agriculture (WASA) in Egerton University 2.Official launch of the Virtual E-learning platform 3.Official Launch of the SDG month. 4.Harnessing the power of youth in SDG localization Online Dialogue 5.Global Environment Education Partnership (GEEP)East African Hub Consultation in Somalia both Hybrid and Online. 6.Communication tea 7. Global Frameworks related to Climate Change lesson for Interns and Facilitators. 8.Participation of Dean of Students Office Egerton and GSCAYN interns in a tree planting exercise by Hon. Musalia Mudavadi Prime Cabinet Secretary of Kenya at Egerton University;Tree planting in Njoro Precious Schools,Kabianga University,Rvist (Centres of Excellence GCSAYN) 9. Environmental Education As an Enabler to Transformation of the Agriculture food system towards contributing to the AcfCTA' Online Dialogue 10.Koronivia and joint Work on Agriculture related negotiation.Lesson for Interns and Facilitators 11.Africa day 2023 , building capacity and inner strength through challenging times.Online Dialogue.Participation of Executive Director 12.The role of communication in the achievement of sustainable development goals in Africa by 2030 Online Dilogue 13.Njoro Precious Event(Beat Plastic Pollution) Hybrid Event in Kenya with presence of Executive Director Mr Divine 14.Official launch Of GCSAYN office at Egerton University, Lautech university Nigeria ,Rift Valley Institute of Technology 15.Asareca Meeting .Online Dialogue on Transforming the Agri-food system 16.Domenico Session on Virtual Academy .Lessons for interns and Facilitators to learn more on use of Virtual Academy resources 17.How can young people take part in Climate Action through technology and innovation. Online Dialogue with FAO Chief Scientist as main Speaker
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2938018/04/2024 14:30NWP Partner profile
Global
26/08/2024 09:53No presence informationKelsey Warren
Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Education and training, Science and researchWater resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity
crmmocservices
Our mission is to fight for socio-environmental preservation and awareness of its importance through the consolidation of non-profit associations.
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2943323/08/2024 10:00NWP Partner profile
Non-governmental organization (NGO)
Global
23/08/2024 10:08No presence informationKelsey Warren
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Climate scenarios, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Financial support, Impact assessment, Institutional arrangements, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Stakeholder involvement, Technology support, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Health, Adaptation finance, Disaster risk reduction, Energy, Infrastructure, Human settlements, Gender, Indigenous and traditional knowledge, Urban resilience, Tourism, Services, Heavy industry
crmmocservices
Environmental Resources Foundation (ERF) is a not for profit foundation, constituted under sec-25 of Company Law, to accelerate adoption of sustainable living, through work in communities. Active since 2011, ERF has been working to expand its programs to build an ethic of sustainable living across communities. We want to engage and build many champions of sustainability across communities.
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
  
2943219/08/2024 17:30Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Wetlands International
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaGlobal
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners, Private sector19/08/2024 17:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Science and researchEcosystems, Biodiversity, Coastal areas/zones, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Disaster risk reduction
crmmocservices
As the spotlight on mangrove restoration grows, it is essential to adopt the most effective restoration approaches. Wetlands International presents a series of animated videos that show why inclusive ecological approaches are the way forward. Learn how to move beyond mass monoculture planting by applying the latest scientific insights and involving local communities and other stakeholders.
2595NWPSearchableItemMultimedia material;#Educational/training materialglobal
https://www.wetlands.org/publication/video-series-how-to-effectively-restore-mangroves/;#A series of animated videos that show why inclusive ecological mangrove restoration approaches are the way forward
  
2541322/04/2016 11:56NWP Partner profilePartner
Non-governmental organization (NGO)
Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Central America, Europe, North America, Pacific/Oceania, South AmericaGlobal, Local, National, Regional
13/08/2024 16:41No presence informationunfccc\trusau
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Climate observations, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Impact assessment, Knowledge management, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Science and research, Socio-economic data and information, Vulnerability assessmentAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Coastal areas/zones, Disaster risk reduction, Infrastructure, Human settlements
Roberto Felix
-
NWPSearchableItemb.granziera@TNC.ORGluz.gil@tnc.org
  
2942722/07/2024 20:30Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Association for Promoting Sustainability in Campuses and Communities
Local
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Practitioners09/08/2024 19:06No presence informationKelsey Warren
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Education and trainingAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Community-based adaptation, Energy, Urban resilience
crmmocservices
Fostering Ecosystem Restoration, APSCC has launched an "International Climate Change Adaptation & Resilience Program (ICCARP)" to catalyze the younger generation and communities for transformation. Under ICCARP, we are driving several thematic international programs that have been conceptualized and progressed as Sustainable Transformation agenda on Responsible Nation Building, Community Empowerment & Development, and Ecosystem Restoration Initiatives, in collaboration/ partnership with multiple stakeholders across the globe. The primary objective is to bring about attitude change for sustainability at Pre and Post-Secondary Institutions and communities, complementing multiple Sustainable Development Goals under the following themes: Green Campus Initiative Lab-to-Land Environment Education and Action Research Regenerative Agriculture - Topsoil Pollution Prevention, Ecosystems Restoration and Organic Food Production Conserving Fauna of Concern Cooperation for Wetlands and Aquifer Restoration and Conservation Industrial Symbiosis & Revitalizing Village Industries for Sustenance
2543NWPSearchableItemOnline portal
  
2943108/08/2024 17:00Case study
The Okabena C&D project was a success and there are several lessons that can be learned from this project and implemented into a framework for best practices in adaptive water management. Creating Okabena C&D as a Water Adaptation A major good practice and lesson learned was that the C and D coordination was favored upon other means of controlling the drainage, is because of a strong role played by producers and their self-sufficiency in securing funding. Another reason included that theland-based draining was large and a C&D area with a board could better fund and maintain the project as the producers would have mind control on their work. Further if they need maintenance or infrastructure replacements, it is easier to fund it in a levy system. Furthermore, liability insurance is provided to C&Ds through the Saskatchewan Conservation and Development Association. C&D Governance and Maintenance Another lesson learned and outcome was with regards to the governance and the maintenance of the C and D. Apart from the partial funding from the government that contributed greatly to the project, the producers worked as a financially self-sufficient group. As an organization, every C&D has a yearly audit to set the budget that is required for it to operate and the budget comes from levies on the landowners. Currently, there is a C&D Board consisting of 5 members governing and overseeing the C&D based on C&D legislation. The board is all volunteers that get reimbursed for annual meetings. The board charges the landowners with 70 cents an acre for operations and 38 cents an acre for administration. The board has a secretary that helps with ongoing work such as complaints, record-keeping, expenses, and maintenance. The board is responsible for the water infrastructure in the area and the water that flows through the main ditch onward into Lake Winnipeg. Therefore, if there are any issues with culverts not draining properly in the C&D or if there are constructions or activities in neighboring areas that may impact the quality of water in the Okabena C&D area or in case of any concerns, the board maintains the integrity and may consult with WSA. In an example, the board was consulted as a third party to put forth their concern so that everything is discussed before the certificate of construction for a neighbor gets approved, even though the construction was legislated by provincial regulations from the Ministry of Environment. Duplication of processes As Okabena was the first C&D in the province built after more than thirty years. At first it was challenging for the producers to understand the Conservation and Development Act of Saskatchewan and follow the different processes that needed to be completed to establish the C&D. However, after its completion, Okabena worked as a model to create more C&Ds in the province. MJRWS a produced a manual on developing C&Ds that is available online and at least five other C&Ds were developed in the province after Okabena. The mandate of creating more C&Ds to protect the water will be carried by a partnership between Saskatchewan Conservation and Development Association, Water Security Agency as the regulator, and MJRWS from an environmental benefit perspective with a stewardship approach. Collaborative Forms of Working and Effective Leadership By developing C&Ds, landowners engage to work collaboratively to tackle agricultural water management issues as a community rather than as individuals and have local governance over local water management issues. For creating and implementing water management projects within their boundaries, producers are able to borrow financial resources, expropriate land and introduce administrative and operational levies to the municipal tax roll. Establishment of C&Ds is increasingly known as an effective public interest tool to provide responsible water management on agricultural lands.. A positive quality of C&Ds is that they are community-based projects. They create communities so that landowners work together for the betterment and are committed to their collective benefits. In this way, no single landowner will simply act alone on their self-interest to create ditches. Instead, they worked together to implement the environmental components of the project such as vegetating ditches and staging the water. Collaboration emerged over a period of time. When the C&D was first established, there were some hard feelings between landowners that was a hinderance for producers to working together. This was eventually resolved when community demonstrated more openness and willingness to put aside the incidents of the past and work towards a common objective and collective benefit through a C and D. Another factor that benefited the project was that there were not a large number of landowners so they could work closely and cooperatively. Moosejaw River Watershed Stewards Association and the Water Security Agency also played a role in the success of the project. A strong role was played by the government educating and interacting with people. As the petition had to be signed by the landowners within the area to form the C&D, the producers that had taken the initiative of forming the C&D and later created the C&D board, where representatives of the board had one-on-one conservations with each producer. Through these conservations, the producers understood how that the project would be a benefit to them and agreed to be involved in it. The leadership explained that these initial phases should have the patience to talk to people and be good communicators. The major lesson learned from this exercise is that not only is collaboration between the participants important but also the effective leadership on part of both producers but also government to care about the mandate of the project that allowed greater engagement of people to make a difference. Thus an important developing the C&D, leaders or champions of the community should be identified as the community also will support and follow them. Funding Availability Local watersheds need additional funding and support from different government departments, such as the Ministry of Agriculture, Highways, Environment, and Municipal Affairs to establish C&Ds and producers should also be more patient with government timelines and processes. C and D and Climate Change Another lesson learnt by the farmers is the importance of climate change. Their farming practices and technology that they use for pesticide have changed. Because of Saskatchewan’s extreme weather conditions, climate change has escalated the need to act. Water Security Agency has a strong agricultural water management strategy. Similarly, neighbouring provinces have strong mitigation plans.
University/education/training organization
Okabena C and D as a governance institution The outcome of the Best Management Practices was the creation of the C and D authority, a governance institution and the engineering channel of the big ditch drainage. The Okabena C&D area was created in 2012. After three successive attempts to create the C and D the producers were able to effectively coordinate themselves and work collaboratively with Moose Jaw River Watershed Stewards, a watershed association, in Farm Stewardship Programming. They received additional support and funding as a C&D area from multiple agencies. The Conservation and Development Act of Saskatchewan and Water Security Agency guidelines were used to build in the project. The Okabena C and D is a high quality and robust governance institution that offers multiple benefits apart from improving water quality and better agricultural productivity. It also improves water quality and is a climate-adaptive measure. After overcoming the challenges of using 1949 the Conservation and Development Act of Saskatchewan and establishing Okabena as a C&D area, Okabena was used as a model and more C&Ds were created in the area. The members of the Okabena C&D consider the completion of the project as a legacy in the area as the Okabena was the first C&D in the province in thirty years. The smooth process of creating the C and D has led to similar processes being formulated. The Drainage Ditch- an Engineering Success The second outcome of the Okabena C and D processes was the engineering of the big ditch drainage, the water flows at the top end and the peak flow of the water entering the Moose Jaw River were identified. It takes more than ten years for the ditches to get vegetated, however, the results in 2016 also shown less sedimentation as a consequence of the vegetation process. Producers have also expressed high satisfaction as the water has gotten drained off and crop yields have become better. Tests within Okabena in 2016 have shown that there has been a significant reduction in bacteria and sedimentation which improves water quality entering the Moose Jaw River’s main channel. This is because the water is now flowing with a less velocity and through a grassed natural waterway. The producers have seen the change in the area by experiencing repetitive dry and wet cycles every ten years.
University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
North AmericaLocal
Canada
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers08/08/2024 17:12No presence informationKelsey Warren
Biere, K. (2016a). Okabena project- a model of success retrieved from https://www.producer.com by 2020/12/07 Biere, K. (2016b). Much ado about drainage retrieved from https://www.producer.com/news/much-ado-about-drainage/ by 2020/12/07 Biere, K. (2016c). New regulations could make drainage easier retrieved from https://www.producer.com/news/new-regulations could-make-drainage-easier/ by 2020/12/07 Drainage Stewardship Upper Souris Watershed Association (2016) retrieved from http://lowersouris.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/Final_Draina e_Stewardship_Book.pdf by 2020/12/07 Esri Inc. (2020). ArcGIS Pro (Version 2.5) [Okabena location]. Esri Inc. Esri Inc. (2020). ArcGIS Pro (Version 2.5) [Area of Okabena C&D]. Esri Inc. Needelman, B. A., Kleinman, P. J., Strock, J. S., & Allen, A. L. (2007). Drainage ditches: Improved management of agricultural drainage ditches for water quality protection: An overview. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 62(4), 171-178. Saskatchewan watershed authority. 2006. Moose Jaw river watershed, source water protection plan retrieved from https://www.wsask.ca/Global/Water%20Info/Watershed%20Planni g/MooseJawRiverWatershedSourceWaterProtectionPlan.pdf by 2020/12/07 The Saskatchewan Gazette, Authority of queen’s printer. (2014). Retrieved from https://publications.saskatchewan.ca/api/v1/products/70846/for ats/78741/download by 2020/12/07 Water Security Agency (WSA). 2017. Conservation Development Area Authority, The Guide retrieved from https://www.wsask.ca/Global/Water%20Programs/Agricultural%2 Drainage/Agricultural%20Water%20Management%20Strategy/C%2 and%20D%20Development%20 Guide%20Final%20low%20res%20for%20web.pdf by 2020/12/07 Water Security Agency. (2021). Saskatchewan Water security plan 2025. See https://www.wsask.ca/Global/About%20WSA/25%20Year%20Wate %20Security%20Plan/WSA_25Year Reportweb.pdf. Accessed on 14.2.2021.
Adaptation planning and practices, Institutional arrangementsWater resources, Ecosystem-based adaptation
crmmocservices
Okabena is a Conservation and Development area (“C and D”) in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. It was defined and established in 2012 by the Minister responsible for Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, as “The Okabena Conservation and Development Area Number One Hundred and Seventy-six”. A Conservation and Development Area in Canada is defined as a governance institution that allows landowners to work together in developing agricultural water management projects for better agricultural productivity, better water quality and greater climate adaptation. The Okabena C and D area covers 14,800 acres of land that drain towards Moose Jaw River and is located near Regina, the capital city of Saskatchewan. The main objective of this study is to document the best management practice that is the C and D and big ditch drainage that have been implemented in Okabena to engage in agricultural water management. The study that was identified through a discussion with the Water Security Agency of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Association of Watersheds. The main problem that this area has been facing was that of agricultural runoff that is high in sediments. Individual farmers had cut ditches to drain water off their land to maximize their crop returns. These localised ditches were causing uncontrolled volumes and velocities of water runoff to the nearby Moosejaw River. Erosion and sedimentation would also lead to poor water quality as the drainage carried soil-absorbed polluting chemicals. Land that is heavily drained leads to greater levels of nutrients and sediments dumped into surface water thereby decreasing downstream water quality. Another consequence of the field drainage activities is the increased costs to downstream landowners due to flooding problems associated with greater flows of water moving across fields and longer durations of standing water restricting agricultural production activities. As all the producers within the basin were draining water from their land, they all had to take responsibility for the damage which resulted in erosion and sedimentation. The Best Management Practice adopted by the Okabena was the creation of a C and D, in partnership with watershed agencies such as Moosejaw River Watershed Stewards (MJRWS) and the Water Security Agency (WSA) for the creation of a drainage ditch that diverts the agricultural run-off into the Moosejaw River in 2011. The aim of the Okabena C and D project was to reduce sedimentation and improve water quality entering the Moose Jaw River’s main channel. C&D’s provide local governance over local water management issues utilising the knowledge of landowners. The C&D’s aim to develop engineering solutions like drainage ditches and flood control mechanisms. C&D projects embrace a drainage stewardship approach and through proper ditch construction with grassed waterways, sedimentation and nutrient loading into downstream waters is reduced. The Okabena C and D was formed after 30 years and 3 attempts. It was the first C&D that was developed in Saskatchewan since 1970s. It informed and facilitated development of other C&Ds within the area. In 2011, the project was initiated by Moose Jaw River Watershed Stewards (MJRWS) where a successful collaboration between the MJRWS, producers within the C&D area, and Water Security Agency (WSA) was formed. The project was partially funded by the government and partially by levies on municipal taxes. Engineering firms were hired to design and construct the ditch drainage and the project was completed in 2013. The total cost of the project was $900,000 and the government contributed $280,000 through a pilot project program with ongoing costs per acre for maintenance being levied on rural municipal taxes. Forming the C and D was a tedious process. The initial group comprised of 14 landowners in 2011. By 2016 it included about 50 producers in two rural municipalities (Briere, 2016a). Land was consolidated by bigger farms (around 1400 acres) The Conservation and Development Act of Saskatchewan, legislated in 1949, allows land-owners in a certain area to petition for a C&D Association. C&Ds are producer led organizations with an elected board with the ability to control land, design, construct, and maintain flood control and other works on be- half of producers within the area. C&Ds are also drainage, or sub-drainage, basins defined by hydrology of the landscape (WSA, 2017). Producers within or close to a C&D area can request to add a parcel of land to the C&D for drainage or take a land out of the C&D if drainage is not happening (Drainage Stewardship Upper Souris Watershed Association, 2016; Briere, 2016b). To establish the C&D, producers communicated with their neighbors and a series of more than six meetings was held between 2011 and 2012 to bring everyone together and engage them. Through a democratic/consultative process tall agreed to the project to move ahead. A business plan was created preceding the development of the C&D. The producers in the drainage basin also decided that they needed to form a C&D with the ability to control land and tax for maintenance, and approve future works. After the initial agreement, when they had the engineered plan with associated costs of building the drainage, everyone was consulted again and voted for the plan. The C&D board got consent of the plan from landowners and the Saskatchewan Environment Ministry. They had to get approval from everybody that had a quarter section within that area for the project to go ahead. 48 landowners within the water basin signed permits to agree to the plan to form the C&D. Landowners permissions allowed the group to receive approval from WSA and the recognition of C&D. They agreed to improve the main waterway through engineered designs, resloping, revegetating, and installation of control structures. C&Ds work closely with WSA. WSA has the authority to apply taxes to the municipal tax roll within the C&Ds for construction and maintenance costs. A legally binding petition was developed with WSA, signed by two-thirds of the landowners, and then presented to the Minister in charge for approval to form a C&D. Similar to the process of becoming a C&D, the producer group brings drainage works into regulatory compliance and new engineered works also should be approved by WSA for the construction to take place. Project leaders within the producers and the governmental agencies were identified as the champions of the project to enhance collaboration between themselves. Project leaders within the producers demonstrated effective volunteerism and leadership to build a community of producers that worked together for the betterment and committed to their collective benefits. The project was an engineered drainage channel to minimize the sedimentation and erosion discharged into the Moose Jaw River and to reduce the impact of flooding on farmland. After the C&D was established and the plan got approved, an engineering firm was hired through WSA to set out the drainage area and drainage design. Afterwards, a contractor was hired to build the drainage. The project was designed by the engineering firm AECOM. AECOM is an engineering and infrastructure firm that develops and implements solutions to complex environmental challenges and projects. They collected data and conducted field surveys. Their findings suggested that in the upland, the runs and ditches were shallow and farmed through normal agricultural operations. They noted that on the lower reach of the creek (south of the railroad), the slope is steeper and the channel becomes deeper and more defined. The solution to the problem was to control the erosion by shaping and sloping the channels, seeding them to grass and installing grade control structures. Ditches could not be made straight from the producers’ lands to the river because that increases velocity’s flow. Therefore, the project followed the course of the natural waterway of the drainage back to the actual waterway of the Moose Jaw River. Through the creation of the vegetated ditches, erosion and sedimentation is reduced. In addition to erosion, significant rainfall events contributed to runoff that could also cause flooding. In that regard, the capacity of culverts through the highway and the railroad were evaluated and adapted to meet the normal flood frequency criteria. They came up with a business plan for the producers’ area. The plan execution comprised of excavating existing water drainage streams that were within the topography of the land. After these drainage streams were cleaned out the culverts across the highway and the railroad tracks and other roads were more strategically placed to contain the flow to navigate it through certain areas to slow down the flow as it makes it way down to the river. Another important factor of the engineering was they had to hold back the upstream water to stage the stream and control the flow. For this very reason the natural waterway of this drainage program is gated culvert. As the water streams open up in the spring, the gated culverts hold back the water up top. So those culverts open from the bottom to the top and at first the top culverts stay closed. The construction of the ditch started in the fall of 2012 and was finished in a very timely manner by the winter of 2013. The three main channels did not get grassed until the summer of 2013. There was heavy snowfall and spring run-off in the winter but there was no damage to the project. The cost of Okabena project was CAD $900,000. The engineering and design of the ditch cost CAD $68,000. The construction of the ditch cost approximately $700,000 and there were some other contingency expenses. The project funding came partially from the province and partially from the producers through the C&D levies. The Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) and the Provincial Council of Add Boards (PCAB) contributed through the Canada-Saskatchewan Farm Stewardship Program for a cost sharing project. This relief fund of CAD 2,80,000 was available as the government was trying to come up with a solution to the excess water problem apart from crop insurance and other ad hoc payments, which are band-aid approaches. There was funding available for producers to reduce sedimentation and erosion and improve water quality. The Farm Stewardship Program was to fund 75% of the total project costs up to a maximum of $280,000. The remaining were to be funded by the landowners and costs per acre for maintenance levied on rural municipal taxes.. The levy was $53 an acre and the distribution over 10 years facilitated the payment for landowners. In 2012, the Okabena C&D Board requested the local Government Committee of Saskatchewan Municipal Board (SMB) to incur expenditures and create a debt not payable within the current year, in the sum of up to $800,000. The amount of debt to be payable on completion of construction and finalization of long-term borrowing, but not later than December 31, 2013 with interest at a fixed interest rate not to exceed 5.6% per annum, payable annually. The local Government Committee authorized the SMB to borrow the sum of $800,000.
2552NWPSearchableItemabg961@uregina.caasmitabhardwaj8@gmail.comTechnical document/report
  
2943025/07/2024 16:30NWP Partner profile
Non-governmental organization - NGO, Private sector
National
25/07/2024 16:30crmmocservices
Adaptation planning and practices, Capacity building, Communication and outreach/awareness, Education and training, Impact assessment, Monitoring and evaluation/M&E, Socio-economic data and informationAgriculture, Food security, Water resources, Ecosystems, Coastal areas/zones, Energy, Indigenous and traditional knowledge
crmmocservices
As an agro-based organization, Conrad Global Connect works to adapt to climate change in accordance with the UNFCCC. We concentrated on putting climate-smart agriculture techniques into practice, such as improving soil health, managing water, and diversifying crops. This entails developing farmers' capacity, setting up weather monitoring systems, and promoting laws that assist them. Along with these efforts, we support resilient agriculture, partnerships, and a lower carbon footprint in order to guarantee food security and sustainable development in Nigeria.
NWPSearchableItemTechnical document/report
https://cgconnects.com.ng, https://cgconnects.com.ng
  
2942822/07/2024 20:30Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Association for Promoting Sustainability in Campuses and Communities
Global
Communities, Practitioners22/07/2024 20:30crmmocservices
Biodiversity, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Ecosystems, Water resources
crmmocservices
UN DECADE ON ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION – Youth & Cities Challenge
2544NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Online portal;#Technical document/report
  
2942618/07/2024 18:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Association for Promoting Sustainability in Campuses and Communities
Global
Brazil, Japan, India, Italy, and Romania
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers, Private sector18/07/2024 18:00crmmocservices
Capacity building, Institutional arrangementsInfrastructure
crmmocservices
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a global theme. However, social, cultural, and natural characteristics of each nation should influence the application of CSR. This chapter describes CSR practices in five countries: Brazil, Japan, India, Italy, and Romania. The method applied is a descriptive case study, and a qualitative analysis is made. Cross-cultural comparison studies may help one better understand how CSR practices emerge in each country in a globalized economy.
2540NWPSearchableItemScientific/peer reviewed publication;#Educational/training material
  
2942518/07/2024 18:00Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Association for Promoting Sustainability in Campuses and Communities
Asia
Academics and scientists, Policy makers18/07/2024 18:00crmmocservices
Energy
crmmocservices
India’s demand for energy is growing with the energy gap between demand and supply of about 12–15 %. As a developing country, India has to play an important role in the development and utilization of renewable energy resources (solar, wind, bio-energy, hydro, etc.) for sustainable development. The country has high potential to harvest the renewable energy because of strategic geographic location. Considering the renewable energy potential, India can play a responsible role to take positive steps towards carbon emission and ensuring for its sustainable future by increase its energy share through renewable energy. Currently, the renewable energy accounts 26 GW (12 %) of the total power generation capacity of 212 GW as in 2013. The renewable energy industry has shown a promising growth over the last couple of years compared to non-renewable energy and it is expected to grow at an even higher rate in the Twelfth Five Year Plan period (2012–2017). The country’s vision in renewable energy development aims to achieve 55 GW by 2022, and by 2050 about 50 % of its total energy through renewable sources. An extensive pool of knowledgeable and skilled manpower competent to design, install and maintain renewable energy systems will be required. The MNRE report published in 2012 on “Human Resource Development Strategies for Indian Renewable Energy Sector”, at a moderate growth of 10 % the wind sector would employ about 75,000 people by the year 2020. Similarly, the report estimated that Solar PV on-grid and off grid sector would employ 1,52,000 and 2,25,000 respectively by the year 2022. The estimated numbers are equally large for the other renewable energy technologies like solar thermal, small hydro, biomass, biogas etc. Shortage of skilled and quality trained manpower is considered to be a major challenge in the growth of renewable energy sector. Higher educational institutions (HEIs) and renewable energy organizations have to play a crucial role in human resource development and capacity building to overcome the challenges, and achieve projected renewable energy target in sustainable manner to reduce India’s energy dependency.
2538NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Scientific/peer reviewed publicationIndia
  
2942418/07/2024 17:30Knowledge Resource
Civil society
Association for Promoting Sustainability in Campuses and Communities
AsiaRegional
Academics and scientists, Communities, Policy makers18/07/2024 17:30crmmocservices
Capacity building, Education and training, Institutional arrangementsEnergy
crmmocservices
India has one of the largest number of higher education systems in the world next to China and the US. With an increase in demand for higher education in recent years, Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) are required to manage more students than they can afford, demanding more energy/other vital resources such as water and predominantly, more fossil fuels, exerting more pressure on the campus ecosystems, contributing more to the emission of green house gases (GHGs). This fact is never duly recognized, neither at the level of the concerned campus nor at state/national policy levels. However, the breadth and depth of climate change issues/problems/concerns have prompted greater international interest/commitment in the need for campus sustainability through Campus Carbon Neutrality (CCN). To become carbon neutral, universities in the developed world are striving to reduce their emissions of GHGs, cut their use of energy, use more renewable energy, and emphasize the importance of sustainable energy sources. Our insights/experiences have indicated several key barriers and major strategies which could be adopted for CCN in India and which are discussed in this chapter.
2537NWPSearchableItemEducational/training material;#Scientific/peer reviewed publication
1 - 100Next