Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
MRV/Transparency helpdesk

:

News : CGE Side Event Responding To Needs To Implement The Enhanced Transparency Framework

Technical resources for implementing the measurement, reporting and verification arrangements under the Convention and the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement.
CGE Side Event Responding To Needs To Implement The Enhanced Transparency Framework

The Consultative Group of Expert (CGE), on the margins of the June 2019 Climate Change Conference (SB50) in Bonn, Germany, organized a side-event to present its 2019 CGE work plan and also highlight how it is responding to the needs arising from the enhanced transparency framework.

The group invited few countries to present their experiences and lessons learned in the process of preparing their national communications (NC) and/or biennial update reports (BURs), and how they are building on from those experiences and lessons learned to prepare for the enhanced transparency framework (ETF).
The CGE Chair, Mr. Gervais Ludovic Istoua Madzou (Congo), presented the 2019 work plan of the CGE,  which addresses the capacity-building needs of developing countries in a more targeted and strategic manner, in order to  facilitate improved reporting of developing countries over time and support the implementation of the ETF under Article 13 of the Paris Agreement.
Since February 2019, as part of its work plan, the CGE has already launched several activities, such as a targeted survey to developing countries to better understand their needs for implementing the MRV arrangements and the ETF, a toolbox on institutional arrangements to support MRV/transparency of climate action and support, technical guide to prepare for the implementation of the ETF, and the regional hands-on training workshops on institutionalization data management for GHG inventories.
Bangladesh, Jamaica and South Africa shared their experiences and lessons learned on the existing MRV arrangements, and also provided an update on how efforts being undertaken nationally to prepare for the implementation of the ETF.
Jamaica has submitted its first Biennial Update Report (BUR) in 2016 which went through the technical analysis and Facilitative Sharing of Views (FSV) in the same year.  It submitted its third National Communication (NC) in 2018 and , In the context of preparing these reports, two key challenges were highlighted, which were limited technical and human capacity to complete the reports, and inability to disburse resources in original project timeframe. In order to address these challenges, Jamaica received technical and financial support through the United National Development Programme and the Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT). Despite these challenges, Jamaica plans to submit its second BUR and fourth NC in 2020-2022.  It also aims to put in place a robust national MRV system from 2021-2022.
Bangladesh submitted its third NC in 2018.  The presentation highlighted some of the challenges and lessons learned from the process of preparing this report.  Lack of reliable data and information consistent with the requirements of the IPCC 2006 guidelines, lack of institutional capacity and dependence on external experts, and issues to retain sectoral specialist that were trained in the process of preparing these reports were identified as some of the challenges it is facing currently. With a view to addressing these challenges, Bangladesh aims to establish data sharing arrangements at the national level, including a permanent structure at the department of environment which had the mandated to prepare the NCs and BURs. In order to prepare itself for the implementation of the ETF, Bangladesh will build on and enhance the existing institutional arrangement, and plans to use the guidelines and tools, which will be developed by CGE. Bangladesh called for an increased financial and technical support to institutionalize the proposed MRV arrangements, update its National Determined Contributions (NDCs), and prepare their first Biennial Transparency Report (BTR).
South Africa, one of the five countries that has submitted its third BUR, shared its experiences, challenges and lessons learned. With regard to challenges, the following were identified: limited number of and high turnover of key staff members, issues with data management, capacity constraints in using the national GHG inventory information management systems, lack of disaggregated data for the GHG reporting, and a non-centralized information system for climate finance. Efforts to address these challenges include: recruiting sector specialists to compile GHG inventory data, conducting capacity-building for key personnel, formalizing data collection processes, and developing a climate change tracking and evaluation system, which included tracking of climate finance. The presentation also highlighted how the National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Regulations, published in April 2017, formalized the institutional arrangements to ensure consistent and sustainable data input for the GHG inventory. In order to prepare for the ETF, South Africa will continue using the 2006 IPCC guideline, and will set up higher tier methodologies for key categories in country specific emission factor. South Africa also provided a preliminary list of actions that it aims to undertake in its effort to prepare for the implementation of the ETF.
Follow our Facebook page Mitigation & Transparency Exchange for more insights and snapshots.
The Consultative Group of Expert (CGE), on the margins of the June 2019 Climate Change Conference (SB50) in Bonn, Germany, organized a side-event to present its 2019 CGE work plan and also highlight how it is responding to the needs arising from the enhanced transparency framework.