Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Public NAMA

:

My Application Page

NS-297 - Sustainable and Low Carbon Bovine Livestock Development

Guatemala

NAMA Seeking Support for Preparation

  • A Overview
    • A.1Party
      A.2Title of Mitigation Action

      This field is limited by 200 characters.

      A.3Description of mitigation action

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      ·         In 2013, Guatemala approved its National Bovine Livestock Policy and in 2017, Guatemala elaborated its National Low-carbon and Sustainable Bovine Livestock Strategy (NLCSLS). Together, the National Bovine Livestock Policy and the NLCSLS conform Guatemala´s Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMA) for the cattle sub-sector as they refer to a sector-wide and national in scope program, country-driven and anchored in before mentioned policies and development strategies that Guatemala will implement as part of its commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As such, the policies and related financial mechanisms will serve to create an enabling environment and channel financial flows into low-carbon investments in the cattle subsector.

      The NLCSLS is to be implemented nationwide over 15 years, starting in a priority area that covers the departments of Izabal, Petén and Alta Verapaz (Phase 1, 5 years). This region was selected as over 50% of Guatemala’s cattle can be found in this area and expansion of cattle rearing in the past 10 to 15 years has taken place mainly in this area. The proposed NSP would be the key instrument to implement Phase 1 of the NLCSLS during 5 years in the priority area. In Phase 2 and 3 (10 years), more livestock farms and pastures in the priority area as well as in other regions would be phased-in; this is however not part of the present proposed NAMA Support Project (NSP), but refers to its geographic expansion and upscaling in the ten years following the implementation of the NSP.

      The NSP contributes directly to reaching the reductions in GHG emissions as stated in Guatemala´s NDC and is an integral part of the mitigation options in Guatemala´s Low Emissions Development Strategy (LEDS). The improvement of the national capacity to provide technical support will be detrimental for the implementation of low-carbon strategies. For this reason, the NSP would hire technical assistance to work with cattle producers and their organizations and to strengthen the capacity of public and private sector for continued and sustainable technical assistance after the NSP (Phase 1 of the NLCSLS) finalizes.

      • In a period of 5 years, the NSP will promote sustainable low carbon cattle production through a series of measures that will contribute to increase the resilience of the subsector, the increase of CO2 removal, the reduction of CO2e emissions in the cattle subsector, the reduction of the carbon footprint of national milk and meat production, and the increase productivity and competitivity of the subsector. The measures include: improvement of existing pastures, intensive rotational grazing, improved nutrition/diets, improved manure management, silvopastoral systems, the management of natural regeneration and scattered trees within pastures, more efficient water management, improvement of animal husbandry practices, renewable energy at farm level, producers´ organizational capacity strengthening, low/neutral carbon certification and value chain development.
      • To promote the change to sustainable low carbon livestock production, existing national forestry incentive programs will be mobilized, credit programs with banks and cooperatives will be established, and new financial products will be developed as part of the financial mechanisms. The participation of the private and public sectors in the implementation of the proposed project is key.
      • This NSP would result in 40,000 ha of improved and cultivated pastures and 300 farms with improved practices, that result by the end of the NSP (5 years) in the following changes in the prioritized area: (i) a reduction of the milk carbon footprint from 5.8 to 3.9 kg CO2e/kg milk; (ii) a reduction of the meat carbon footprint from 16.5 to 11.2 kg CO2e/kg meat; (iii) avoided GHG emissions of 152,996 tCO2e; (iv) 9,296 tCO2e in removals; (v) an increment of the stocking density from 0.89 to 1.25 LU/ha; (vi) an increase of the production of milk per year from 159 kg/ha/year to 234 kg/ha/year; and (vii) an increase of the meat production from 97 kg/ha/year to 184 kg/ha/year.
      Furthermore, the implementation of good practices and the strengthening of public and private technical assistance capacity will be the basis for increasing the scope of the NSP to over 2,000 farms and 210,000 ha of pasture in the following 10 years through the implementation of Phase 2 and 3 of the NLCSLS with national funds (and eventually funds negotiated with members from the international donor community).
      A.4Sector
      A.5Technology
      A.6Type of action
      A.7Greenhouse gases covered by the action
  • B National Implementing Entity
  • C Expected timeframe for the preparation of the mitigation action
    • C.1Number of months for completion
  • D Currency
    • D.1Used Currency
      Conversion to USD: 1
  • E Cost
    • E.1.1Estimated full cost of preparation
      Conversion to USD: 465,718
      E.1.2Comments on full cost of preparation

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      NSP for preparation 360,000.00 and implementation 9,660,000.00
  • F Support required to prepare the mitigation action
    • F.1.1Amount of Financial support
      Conversion to USD: 12,496,766
      F.1.2Type of required Financial support
      F.1.3Comments on Financial support

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      F.2.1Amount of Technical support
      Conversion to USD: 0
      F.2.2Comments on Technical support

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      F.3.1Amount of capacity building support
      Conversion to USD: 0
      F.3.2Type of required capacity building support
      F.3.3Comments on Capacity Building support

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

  • G Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action
    • G.1Relevant National Policies

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      The NSP is directly linked to and embedded in several climate change laws and policies as well as agriculture and livestock development policies and strategies. The following are the main legal and planning instruments:

      • Guatemala’s 2013 Climate Change Framework Law (Decree 7-2013) created the government structure to address its climate change priorities: reducing vulnerability to environmental disasters, building adaptation capacity, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which are laid out in the 2009 National Climate Change Policy (Governmental Agreement 329-2009).
      • In compliance with article 11 of this law a “National Action Plan on Climate Change-PANCC” was developed and approved by the National Climate Change Council in 2016. Reducing GHG emissions in the livestock sub-sector is an integral part of the PANCC.
        • The National Development Plan “K'atun Nuestra Guatemala 2032” (SEGEPLAN, 2014), affirms that the national planning system will work on policies, plans and budget based on results management, territorial and sectoral policies and will monitor and record public investment with transparency. “K´atun Nuestra Guatemala 2032” includes clear and concrete targets for GHG mitigation for all sectors, including agriculture and livestock.
      • In its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC, 2015), the country committed to a reduction of 11.2 percent of total GHG emissions projected to the year 2030 based on the 2005 inventory. In the same NDC, the country offers a more ambitious reduction of up to 22.6 percent of its total GHG emissions projected to the year 2030 (on the basis of the 2005 inventory), conditioned on new and additional technical and financial support from the international community.
      • Through the USAID/LEDS project (2014-2019), Guatemala receives support to build institutional capacity to respond to climate change. In formulating Guatemala´s LEDS, the government is working with key private sector counterparts, including industry associations, farmer associations, and cooperatives, to implement practices and technologies that reduce GHG emissions, improve competitiveness, and increase manufacturing efficiencies in the Guatemalan economy. The LEDS formulation has enabled Guatemala to develop more consistent and up-to-date GHG inventories, generate more precise sectoral baselines and emissions forecasts, and effectively measure and report on climate mitigation activities; it is also one of the key operational instruments for implementing concrete mitigation actions and for the country to meet its commitments in the NDC.

      The LEDS (Draft LEDS 2018-2050, Government of Guatemala) includes four specific measures for the cattle sub-sector:

      (1)   Intensive rotational grazing and pasture management (promotion of intensive grazing with rotation and supplementation with forage produced on farms, promote associations of grasses with legumes, promote the use of improved pastures).

      (2)   Establishment and improvement of silvopastoral systems (e.g. dispersed trees within pastures, live fences, fodder banks, pastures and specific tree arrangements) to increase carbon sequestration in cattle farms.

      (3)   Integral management of manure (promote adequate storage, treatment and manure application practices to soils, promotion of biodigesters in cattle farms and dairy operations for the production of biogas and energy from manure).

      (4)   Efficient management and use of water for cattle production (improve the efficiency of existing irrigation systems, promote rainwater harvesting systems and promote the installation of efficient mini-irrigation systems).

      • In 2013, the National Bovine Livestock Policy was approved and in 2017, Guatemala elaborated its National Low-carbon and Sustainable Bovine Livestock Strategy (NLCSLS). This national strategy gives life to the National Bovine Livestock Policy (MAGA, 2013) and involves concrete measures in the cattle sub-sector that contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and achieving Guatemala´s targets in its NDC.

      Together, the National Bovine Livestock Policy and NLCSLS conform Guatemala´s Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMA) for the cattle sub-sector as they refer to a sector-wide and national in scope program, country-driven and anchored in before mentioned policies and development strategies that Guatemala will implement as part of its commitment to reduce GHG emissions. As such, the policies and financial mechanisms will serve to create an enabling environment and channel financial flows into low-carbon investments.

      The NLCSLS will be implemented nationwide in 15 years. Implementation will happen in three, 5-year phases starting in a priority area that covers the departments of Izabal, Petén and Alta Verapaz (Phase 1). The proposed NSP would be the key instrument to implement Phase 1 of the NLCSLS during 5 years in the priority area. The priority area was selected as over 50% of Guatemala’s cattle can be found in this area and expansion of cattle rearing in the past 10 to 15 years has taken place mainly in this area. In Phase 2 and 3, more livestock farms and pastures in the priority area as well as in other regions would be phased-in; this is however not part of the proposed NSP, but refers to its upscaling.

      The sector policy (NLCSLS) mitigation ambition is to reduce the milk carbon footprint from 5.8 kgCO2e/l milk to 2.2 kgCO2e/l milk in 15 years and to reduce the beef carbon footprint from 16.5 kgCO2e/kg beef to 7.9 kgCO2e/kg beef in the same period.

      • Synergies will be possible with initiatives from the private sector, such as ASODEL that has developed an environmental and best practices guide for milk producers; and has agreed with its members from the milk industry to pay a better price for milk produced using good practices and that has a lower carbon footprint.
      • From a socio-economic perspective, small-scale cattle farming represents the main income source and livelihood of many rural families, while contributing as well to their food and nutritional security by providing high quality protein. Estimates from the National Agricultural Census of 2003, reveal that 62.1% of the farms (with less than 5 animals per farm) produce milk for self-consumption and another 31.6% of the farms (with herds between 5 and 49 animals per farm) belong to small producers who market part of their production and use for self-consumption the rest. These data highlight the importance of cattle raising as a means of livelihood for a significant number of rural families in the country.

      The sustainable development co-benefits of the NSP relate to the increase of income for the livestock raising small and poor producers; as such the NSP will have a positive effect on improving livelihoods and reducing poverty. Increase of income will come from increased milk and beef production, the sale of poles, wood and fruits from silvopastoral systems, and less production costs, amongst others. In addition, the competitiveness of the sub-sector in international markets will improve as consequence of reduced production costs and farm and product carbon certifications. Due to a better productive performance in the sub-sector there will be an increase in the generation of employment in the rural area.

      • Additionality of the NSP lies in the expected GHG abatement benefits which have been calculated for 5 years (end of NSP) as follows: (i) a reduction of the milk carbon footprint from 5.8 to 3.9 kg CO2e/kg milk; (ii) a reduction of the meat carbon footprint from 16.5 to 11.2 kg CO2e/kg meat; (iii) avoided GHG emissions: 152,996 tCO2e; and (iv) removed CO2: 9,296 tCO2e.
      Without the NSP, cattle producers will continue the traditional model of extensive cattle raising that uses practices that lead to high GHG emissions, low productivity and environmental deterioration. Furthermore, without the NSP national capacity to provide technical assistance to transform bovine livestock production to a sustainable and low-carbon production will not be developed and financial mechanisms for modernization and adoption of low-carbon practices and technologies will remain undeveloped and will not be put in place.
      G.2Link to other NAMAs
  • H Attachments
  • I Support received
    • I.1Outside the Registry

      This field is limited by 5000 characters.

      I.2Within the Registry
      Support providedSupportTypeAmountCommentDate
      No records to display.