- A Overview
- B National Implementing Entity
- C Expected timeframe for the implementation of the mitigation action
- D Currency
| D.1 | Used Currency |
|
| Conversion to USD: 1 |
|
- E Cost
| E.1.1 | Estimated full cost of implementation | |
| E.1.2 | Comments on full cost of implementation |
The pilot program estimates a cost of 4.8 million USD (based on a former project "Wet by dry seals substitusion" in Nuevo Pemex and Poza Rica Regions). For the total program an estimated amount of 47.8 million USD (35 million Euros) in support would be required.
|
| E.2.1 | Estimated incremental cost of implementation | |
| E.2.2 | Comments on estimated incremental cost of implementation |
Based on the costs of each and every pilot project that could be added to the NAMA.
|
- F Support required for the implementation the mitigation action
| F.1.1 | Amount of Financial support | |
| F.1.2 | Type of required Financial support | |
| F.1.3 | Comments on Financial support |
|
| F.2.1 | Amount of Technological support | |
| F.2.2 | Comments on Technological support |
Amount to be determined.
|
| F.3.1 | Amount of capacity building support | |
| F.3.2 | Type of required capacity building support | |
| F.3.3 | Comments on Capacity Building support |
Amount to be determined
|
- G Estimated emission reductions
| G.1 | Amount | |
| G.2 | Unit | |
| G.3 | Additional imformation (e.g. if available, information on the methodological approach followed) |
The methodology used for determining the CO2 equivalent emissions reduction related to this NAMA reasonably minimizes the calculated uncertainty and generates accurate, coherent and reproducible results, following what is established by the standard NMX-SAA-14064-1-IMNC-2007. In order to guarantee that the emissions reduction calculation be performed in the most successful and conservative way, the methodology AM0023 (“Leak detection and repair in gas production, processing, transmission, storage and distribution systems and in refinery facilities”) has been used as reference, which has been approved by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for the validation of projects under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
The development of this methodology includes the additionality assessment, namely, to conclude if a certain Project Activity truly requires an incentive in order to be implemented and in consequence, obtain the emissions reduction calculated by the Project Proponent.
|
- H Other indicators
| H.1 | Other indicators of implementation |
|
- I Other relevant information
| I.1 | Other relevant information including co-benefits for local sustainable development |
Environmental benefits:
1. GHG emission reductions
2. Black carbon emission reductions through the instalation of pilot flame lighter electronic devices at the natural gas burners
Economic beneftis:
1. Natural Gas production process improvements and economic savings from the methane emission reductions
2. Additional investment in Natural Gas infrastructure through monitoring and quantifying fugitive emissions
Social benefits:
1. Improve population health from GHG emission reductions
2. Improved operations and risk management in Natural Gas infrastructure along the national system
|
- J Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action
| J.1 | Relevant National Policies |
|
| J.2 | Link to other NAMAs | |
- K Attachments
- L Support received
| L.1 | Outside the Registry | |
| L.2 | Within the Registry |
|
|
|