- A Overview
A.1 | Party | |
A.2 | Title of Mitigation Action | This field is required!Title is too long. The limit is 200 characters. |
A.3 | Description of mitigation action |
According to Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency Database, in 2015 government buildings accounted for 21 % of the total energy use by buildings in Thailand with grow projected at 3.3 % per year. Building new energy efficient/ green buildings or retrofitting existing government buildings is often economically viable and can further stimulate private investment in commercial and residential sectors. Current government policy plans retrofits based on the operational age of buildings and does not take into consideration the potential to achieve higher levels of energy efficiency . Further, there is no support to achieve standards beyond basic Building Energy Code requirements for new government buildings nor is there an existing system to assess and collect operational energy performance data of government buildings. The proposed NAMA engages the Pollution Control Department (PCD) to implement a green building standard and certification scheme for existing government buildings. It will support the National Pollution Control Committee in the development of an energy efficiency standard for existing government buildings. Additional activities include MRV, and capability - building. The financial support is expected via ESCO model (at a later stage). This NAMA seeks to stimulate private buildings to adopt green building standards through public sector leadership. The actions proposed in this NAMA will support Thailand's INDC of 20% emissions reduction from BAU by 2030. It is also in line with Thailand's national goal of reducing energy intensity by 30% by 2036, compared to 2010 levels.
|
A.4 | Sector | |
A.5 | Technology | |
A.6 | Type of action | |
A.7 | Greenhouse gases covered by the action | |
- B National Implementing Entity
- C Expected timeframe for the implementaion of the mitigation action
- D Currency
D.1 | Used Currency |
|
Conversion to USD: 1 |
|
- E Cost
E.1.1 | Estimated full cost of preparation | |
E.1.2 | Comments on estimated full cost of preparation |
The preparation cost corresponds to the revision of the Green Building Standard Report and evaluation submission to Government Capacity Building activities. Details in the attached files.
|
E.2.1 | Estimated full cost of implementation | |
E.2.2 | Comments on estimated full cost of implementation |
The total estimated full cost of implementation =5,428,571 USD The full implementation cost covers maintenance cost of participating buildings during 10 year time.Details in the attached file.
|
E.3.1 | Estimated incremental cost of implementation | |
E.3.2 | Comments on estimated incremental cost of implementation |
Incremental cost : 262,858 USD The incremental cost covers policy making, MRV and capacity building Policy making : 5714 USD MRV system : 234,286 USD Capacity building : 22,858 USD
|
- F Estimated emission reductions
- G Other indicators
G.1 | Other indicators of implementation |
- Green building labelling scheme is set up and applied to existing government buildings.
- Percentage of designated government buildings to achieve green building label by 2020.
- Develop MRV framework for collection and reporting of operational energy use in buildings.
- Develop sustainable financing framework for energy efficiency buildings.
- No. of trained personnel for the green government buildings.
|
- H Other relevant information
H.1 | Other relevant information including co-benefits for local sustainable development |
Economic: (1) Reduced utility cost of government budget; (2) Increased energy security from demand - side reductions; (3) Increased market demand for energy efficiency products and business; (4) Increased productivity from a greener and healthier work environment. Environmental: (1) Reduced GHG emissions from reduced electricity generation; (2) Reduced use of water and other natural resources; (3) improved government building environment. Social: (1) Positive health effects from better air quality; (2) Job creation and economic development; (3) Capacity building and skills development.
|
- I Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action
I.1 | Relevant National Policies |
Energy Efficiency Plan (2015 - 2036) Thailand Climate Change Masterplan (2011 - 2050)
|
I.2 | Link to other NAMAs | |
- J Attachments
|
|